계약해제의 효과와 그 법적 성질에 대한 검토- 비소급채권적효과설 = A Study on the Legal Nature and Effects of Contract Cancellation - The Theory of the Effect of Non-retroactive Bond

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

There are conflicting theories on the legal nature of contract cancellation, such as the theory of direct effect, the theory of indirect effect, the theory of liquidation relation, and eclecticism. When the civil code was being established in Germany, German legislators considered how to deal with the legal effects of introducing contract cancellation to civil law. It can be seen in the statement of reasons for the legislation that they initially favored the theory of indirect effect, changed to eclecticism during the deliberation process, and then in the final settlement process changed to the theory of direct effect. Afterwards, during the process of establishing the national assembly, it was reasoned that the effects of contract cancellation were difficult to codify and their interpretation would be left to theories and precedents. Legislators focused instead on obligations for restoration, which could be regarded as the practical effects of contract cancellation, and achieved a legislative compromise of codifying those obligations.
As a result, in Japan, which inherited the German civil code, Japanese legislators also preferred the theory of direct effect but are now gradually switching to the theory of liquidation relation, a phenomenon that is occurring in Korea as well. In the personal view of this writer, however,each of the above approaches has its own set of problems. Accordingly,the writer purposes to argue a new view that an original contract which has been cancelled loses its efficacy for the future and the obligations for restoration should appropriately be viewed as a special act of claim for restitution of unjust enrichment in other words, a theory of the effect of non-retroactive bond. According to this view, it can be judged that the intent of the parties regarding contract cancellation, or the cessation of obligation to perform the parts of a contract not yet performed due to its lapse, is recognized, and the basis of the claim for restitution of unjust enrichment regarding the parts that have already been executed and the basis of liability for damages that have actually occurred are also properly recognized.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 엄동섭, "해제의 효과에 관한 일고찰-법적 구성을 중심으로-" 계명대학교출판부 7 : 1988

2 김용담, "해제의 효과에 관한 일고찰" (4⋅5) : 1985

3 김형배, "해제의 효과에 관한 법리구성" 1978

4 박규용, "해제의 효과에 관한 독일민법의 발전" 한국법학회 (29) : 97-123, 2008

5 박규용, "해제의 효과에 관한 고찰" 한국법학회 7 : 2001

6 김용담, "해제의 효과에 관한 1고찰" (11) : 1983

7 김기선, "한국채권법각론" 법문사 1973

8 오시영, "채권총론" 학현사 2010

9 김석우, "채권법각론" 박영사 1978

10 이태재, "채권각론신강" 진명문화사 1967

11 김증한, "채권각론(제7판)" 2006

12 곽윤직, "채권각론(제6판)" 박영사 2003

13 이은영, "채권각론(제5판)" 박영사 2005

14 김주수, "채권각론(상)" 삼영사 1986

15 김형배, "채권각론(상)" 박영사 1995

16 김증한, "채권각론" 박영사 1988

17 윤철홍, "채권각론" 법원사 2009

18 김상용, "채권각론" 화산미디어 2009

19 송덕수, "신민법강의(제4판)" 박영사 2011

20 김현태, "신고 채권각론" 일조각 1973

21 송호영, "새로운 독일 채무불이행법의 체계" 한국민사법학회 (23) : 2003

22 "법고을 LX DVD"

23 정종휴, "민법개정안 채권편에 대한 소감" 법무부 2001

24 안법영, "계정 독일민법의 해제, 해지법의 일별 -우리 민법전의 개정시안에 관한 논의에 부쳐서-" 한국비교사법학회 9 (9): -47, 2002

25 김동훈, "계약해제의 요건에 관한 민법규정의 개정론" 한국민사법학회 55 (55): 235-257, 2011

26 정진명, "계약해제 · 해지 및 그 효과 - 개정이유와 개정시안의 내용을 중심으로 -" 한국민사법학회 55 (55): 259-296, 2011

27 정종휴, "계약책임의 재구성 -독일 책권법 현대화를 중심으로 -" 한국비교사법학회 9 (9): 69-52, 2002

28 명순구, "계약의 해제, In 이영준박사회갑기념논문집" 1999

29 四宮和夫, "請求權競合論" 一粒社 1980

30 北村實, "解除の效果-五四五條をめぐって, In 民法講座5" 有斐閣 1985

31 山中康雄, "解除の效果, In 總合判例硏究叢書 民法(10)" 有斐閣 1963

32 지원림, "民法講義" 弘文社 2010

33 石坂音四郎, "日本民法債權總論(下)" 有斐閣 1931

34 竹田省, "契約解除ノ性質二就キテ" 有斐閣 3 (3): 1908

35 三宅正男, "契約法(總論)" 靑林書院新社 1978

36 未川博, "契約法(上)" 岩波書店 1942

37 鳩山秀夫, "增訂日本債權法各論(上)" 岩波書店 1931

38 川村泰啓, "商品交換法の體系I" 勁草書房 1982

39 土方寧, "債權法(下)" 1913

40 末弘嚴太郎, "債權各論(全)" 有斐閣 1918

41 我妻榮, "債權各論(上)" 岩波書店 1960

42 松坂佐一, "事務管理⋅不當利得(新版)" 有斐閣 1986

43 Esser, Josef, "Schuldrecht, Bd. I, 6. Aufl." Heidelberg 1984

44 Fikentscher, Wolfgang, "Schuldrecht, 7. Aufl." 1985

45 Wolf, Ernst, "Rücktritt, Vertretenmüssen und Verschulden" 153 : 97-, 1954

46 Stoll, Heinrich, "Rücktritt und Schadensersatz" 131 : 141-, 1929

47 "Planck´s Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch nebst Nebengesetzen, Bd. Ⅱ, 4. Aufl." 1914

48 Rebmann, Kurt, "Münchner Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, 4. Aufl." 2001

49 Huber, Ulrich, "Leistungsstörungen, In Gutachten und Vorschläge zur Überarbeitung des Schuldrechts, Band I" Bundesminister der Justiz 647-, 1981

50 Larenz, Karl, "Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts, Bd. I, 13. Aufl." 1982

51 von Staudinger, Julius, "Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch mit Einführungsgesetz und Nebengesetzen, 12. Aufl." 1985

52 Mugdan, Benno, "Die gesamten Materialien zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Band 2" Neudruck 1979

53 Slawski, Stanislaus, "Die Wirkung der Rücktrittserklärung auf bestehende Schuldverhältnis" Erlangen 1906

54 Seckel, Emil, "Die Gestaltungsrechte des bürgerlichen Rechts, In Festgabe der juristischen Gesellschaft zu Berlin für Richard Koch" 205-, 1903

55 Oertmann, Paul, "Die Bedeutung der Rücktrittserklärung" 69 : 65-, 1904

56 Leser, Hans-Georg, "Der Rücktritt vom Vertrag - Abwicklungsverhältnis und Gestaltungsbefugnisse bei Leistungsstörungen" 1975

57 Dernburg, Heinrich, "Das bürgerliche Recht des Deutschen Reichs und Preussens, Bd. Ⅱ, 1. Aufl." Halle 1899

58 Herholz, Felix, "Das Schuldverhältnis als konstante Rahmenbeziehung" 130 : 257-, 1929

59 Hellwig, Konrad, "Anspruch und Klagerecht" Jena 1900

60 Brox, Hans, "Allgemeines Schuldrecht, 30. Aufl." 2004

61 Stoll, Heinrich, "Abschied von der Lehre der positiven Vertragsverletzungen" 136 : 257-, 1936

62 법무부, "2004년도 민법(재산편) 개정자료집(채권편)" 법무부 2004