RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      The Dilemma of Parameterizing Propagation Time in Blockchain P2P Network

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106930589

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Propagation time on permissionless blockchain plays a significant role in terms of stability and performance inthe decentralized systems. A large number of activities are disseminated to the whole nodes in the decentralizedpeer-to-peer network, thus causing propagation delay. The stability of the system is our concern in the firstplace. The propagation delay opens up opportunities for attackers to apply their protocol. Either by acceleratingor decelerating the propagation time directly without proper calculation, it brings numerous negative impactsto the entire blockchain system. In this paper, we thoroughly review and elaborate on several parameters relatedto the propagation time in such a system. We describe our findings in terms of data communication, transactionpropagation, and the possibility of an interference attack that caused an extra propagation time. Furthermore,we present the influence of block size, consensus, and blockchain scalability, including the relation ofparameters. In the last session, we remark several points associated with the propagation time and use cases toavoid dilemmas in the light of the experiments and literary works.
      번역하기

      Propagation time on permissionless blockchain plays a significant role in terms of stability and performance inthe decentralized systems. A large number of activities are disseminated to the whole nodes in the decentralizedpeer-to-peer network, thus c...

      Propagation time on permissionless blockchain plays a significant role in terms of stability and performance inthe decentralized systems. A large number of activities are disseminated to the whole nodes in the decentralizedpeer-to-peer network, thus causing propagation delay. The stability of the system is our concern in the firstplace. The propagation delay opens up opportunities for attackers to apply their protocol. Either by acceleratingor decelerating the propagation time directly without proper calculation, it brings numerous negative impactsto the entire blockchain system. In this paper, we thoroughly review and elaborate on several parameters relatedto the propagation time in such a system. We describe our findings in terms of data communication, transactionpropagation, and the possibility of an interference attack that caused an extra propagation time. Furthermore,we present the influence of block size, consensus, and blockchain scalability, including the relation ofparameters. In the last session, we remark several points associated with the propagation time and use cases toavoid dilemmas in the light of the experiments and literary works.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 I. Eyal, "financial Cryptography and Data Security" Springer 436-454, 2014

      2 S. Spiekermann, "Towards a value theory for personal data" 32 (32): 62-84, 2017

      3 S. Rahmadika, "Toward privacy-preserving shared storage in untrusted blockchain P2P networks" 2019 : 2019

      4 H. M. Kim, "Toward an ontology-driven blockchain design for supply-chain provenance" 25 (25): 18-27, 2018

      5 J. Poon, "The bitcoin lightning network: scalable off-chain instant payments"

      6 A. Gervais, "Tampering with the delivery of blocks and transactions in bitcoin" 692-705, 2015

      7 A. Kiayias, "Speed-security tradeoffs in blockchain protocols" 2015 : 2015

      8 N. Z. Aitzhan, "Security and privacy in decentralized energy trading through multisignatures, blockchain and anonymous messaging streams" 15 (15): 840-852, 2016

      9 X. Lin, "SAGE : a strong privacy-preserving scheme against global eavesdropping for ehealth systems" 27 (27): 365-378, 2009

      10 R. Khalil, "Revive : rebalancing off-blockchain payment networks" 439-453, 2017

      1 I. Eyal, "financial Cryptography and Data Security" Springer 436-454, 2014

      2 S. Spiekermann, "Towards a value theory for personal data" 32 (32): 62-84, 2017

      3 S. Rahmadika, "Toward privacy-preserving shared storage in untrusted blockchain P2P networks" 2019 : 2019

      4 H. M. Kim, "Toward an ontology-driven blockchain design for supply-chain provenance" 25 (25): 18-27, 2018

      5 J. Poon, "The bitcoin lightning network: scalable off-chain instant payments"

      6 A. Gervais, "Tampering with the delivery of blocks and transactions in bitcoin" 692-705, 2015

      7 A. Kiayias, "Speed-security tradeoffs in blockchain protocols" 2015 : 2015

      8 N. Z. Aitzhan, "Security and privacy in decentralized energy trading through multisignatures, blockchain and anonymous messaging streams" 15 (15): 840-852, 2016

      9 X. Lin, "SAGE : a strong privacy-preserving scheme against global eavesdropping for ehealth systems" 27 (27): 365-378, 2009

      10 R. Khalil, "Revive : rebalancing off-blockchain payment networks" 439-453, 2017

      11 R. Dennis, "Rep on the block : a next generation reputation system based on the Blockchain" 131-138, 2015

      12 M. Milutinovic, "Proof of luck : an efficient blockchain consensus protocol" 1-6, 2016

      13 Z. Xiong, "Optimal pricing-based edge computing resource management in mobile blockchain"

      14 A. Gervais, "On the security and performance of proof of work blockchains" 3-16, 2016

      15 M. Fadhil, "Locality based approach to improve propagation delay on the bitcoin peer-to-peer network" 556-559, 2017

      16 S. P. Miller, "Kerberos authentication and authorization system (Project Athena Technical Plan, Section E.2.1)"

      17 X. Fu, "Jcledger: a blockchain based distributed ledger for JointCloud computing" 289-293, 2017

      18 C. Decker, "Information propagation in the bitcoin network" 1-10, 2013

      19 M. Apostolaki, "Hijacking bitcoin : routing attacks on cryptocurrencies" 375-392, 2017

      20 V. Gramoli, "From blockchain consensus back to byzantine consensus" 107 : 760-769, 2020

      21 A. H. Lone, "Forensic-chain : Ethereum blockchain based digital forensics chain of custody" 1 (1): 21-27, 2018

      22 A. Sapirshtein, "Financial Cryptography and Data Security" Springer 515-532, 2016

      23 K. Croman, "Financial Cryptography and Data Security" Springer 106-125, 2016

      24 G. Gutoski, "Financial Cryptography and Data Security" Springer 497-504, 2015

      25 E. Heilman, "Financial Cryptography and Data Security" Springer 161-162, 2014

      26 X. Liu, "Evolutionary game for mining pool selection in blockchain networks" 7 (7): 760-763, 2018

      27 A. Ouaddah, "Europe and MENA Cooperation Advances in Information and Communication Technologies" Springer 523-533, 2017

      28 E. K. Kogias, "Enhancing bitcoin security and performance with strong consistency via collective signing" 279-296, 2016

      29 M. Blaze, "Divertible protocols and atomic proxy cryptography" Springer 127-144, 1998

      30 D. Di Francesco Maesa, "Distributed Applications and Interoperable Systems" Springer 206-220, 2017

      31 X. Ren, "Datum : managing data purchasing and data placement in a geo-distributed data market" 26 (26): 893-905, 2018

      32 C. Sur, "Communications and Multimedia Security" Springer 214-232, 2010

      33 R. Canetti, "Chosen-ciphertext secure proxy re-encryption" 185-194, 2007

      34 S. Rahmadika, "Blockchain-enabled 5G autonomous vehicular networks" 275-280, 2019

      35 S. Rahmadika, "Blockchain technology for providing an architecture model of decentralized personal health information" 2018

      36 G. Pappalardo, "Blockchain inefficiency in the bitcoin peers network" 7 : 2018

      37 M. Hearn, "Bitcoinj: a Java implementation of a bitcoin client"

      38 S. Nakamoto, "Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system"

      39 I. Eyal, "Bitcoin-NG: a secure, faster, better blockchain"

      40 C. Decker, "Bitcoin transaction malleability and MtGox" Springer 313-326, 2014

      41 M. Fadhil, "Bitcoin network measurements for simulation validation and parameterization" University of Plymouth 109-114, 2016

      42 Q. Xia, "BBDS : blockchain-based data sharing for electronic medical records in cloud environments" 8 : 2017

      43 S. Wei, "BAVP: blockchain-based access verification protocol in LEO constellation using IBE keys" 2018 : 2018

      44 S. Feld, "Analyzing the deployment of Bitcoin's P2P network under an ASlevel perspective" 32 : 1121-1126, 2014

      45 Z. Zheng, "An overview of blockchain technology : architecture, consensus, and future trends" 557-564, 2017

      46 H. Yang, "An efficient privacy-preserving authentication scheme with adaptive key evolution in remote health monitoring system" 8 (8): 1059-1069, 2015

      47 S. Rahmadika, "Advanced Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering" Springer 679-685, 2018

      48 Y. Sompolinsky, "Accelerating Bitcoin's transaction processing: fast money grows on trees, not chains" 2013 : 2013

      49 X. Xu, "A taxonomy of blockchain-based systems for architecture design" 243-252, 2017

      50 S. Rahmadika, "A scoping review in defend against selfish mining attack in bitcoin" 6 (6): 18-26, 2018

      51 R. Schollmeier, "A definition of peer-to-peer networking for the classification of peer-to-peer architectures and applications" 101-102, 2001

      52 M. Fadhil, "A bitcoin model for evaluation of clustering to improve propagation delay in bitcoin network" 468-475, 2016

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.09 0.09 0.09
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.07 0.06 0.254 0.59
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼