영어권 한국어 학습자의 일상대화에 나타난 상투적 표현 이해 연구 = The Understanding of Formulaic Expression Found in Daily Conversation

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this paper is to research on the understanding of formulaic expression found in Daily conversation of English-speaking Korean language learners. According to the literature review, the understanding of formulaic expression is affected by the period of residence. Therefore, formulaic expression is examined with the period of residence. The period of residence is divided 3 periods, 0-3 months, 7-9 months and 13-15 months respectively. Depending on indirectness and frequency, formulaic expression is divided into 4 types. Type A is directness and high frequency, Type B is directness and low frequency, Type C is indirectness and high frequency, Type D is indirectness and low frequency.
According to this, there are 2 research questions. The first research question is examined by looking at the understanding of formulaic expression with relation to the period of residence. Results have shown that the longer the period of residence, the better understanding of formulaic expression of English-speaking Korean language learners. The second research question is the type of difficulty which the English-speaking Korean learners face among the 4 types of formulaic expression. Results have shown that English-speaking Korean language learners received more influenced from frequency rather than indirectness. This research is meaningful as we have examined the acquisition of formulaic expression in Daily conversation which have been overlooked in previous studies. Furthermore, this paper is significant as we have proved that the understanding of formulaic expression received a huge influence from the period of residence.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 문금현, "한국어의 고정적인 화용 표현 연구" 국어국문학회 (152) : 181-217, 2009

2 방혜숙, "한국어 교재에 나타난 인사표현 양상과 그 효과적 교수 방안 연구" 국제한국어교육학회 18 (18): 149-179, 2007

3 전혜영, "한국어 관용표현의 교육 방안" 국제한국어교육학회 12 (12): 181-199, 2001

4 김선정, "한국어 관용어 교재 개발을 위한 기초 연구 및 단원 제시" 이중언어학회 (32) : 35-56, 2006

5 이해영, "태국인 학습자의 한국어 추측 표현 이해 연구" 이중언어학회 (53) : 217-239, 2013

6 McCarthy, Michael, "입말, 그리고 담화 중심의 언어교육" 도서출판 경진 1999

7 이해영, "일본인 한국어 고급 학습자의 거절 화행 실현 양상 연구" 국제한국어교육학회 14 (14): 11-326, 2003

8 서정수, "인사말 비교 연구-한, 일, 영, 중국의 주요 인사말-" 국제한국어교육학회 (8) : 17-47, 1997

9 황선영, "요청 화행에서 중국어권 학습자의 어휘적 완화 장치 습득 연구" 이중언어학회 192-204, 2013

10 박동호, "외국인 학습자를 위한 한국어 관용 표현의 통사적 제약 방안" 한국언어문화교육학회 87-105, 2012

11 문금현, "외국어로서의 한국어 관용표현의 교육" 이중언어학회 (15) : 207-233, 1998

12 兪德子, "외국어로서의 한국어 관용어 교육" 梨花女子大學校 大學院 1998

13 이해영, "비교문화적 화용론에 기초한 한국어의 화용 교육" 이중언어학회 (21) : 45-70, 2002

14 조민정, "문장과 담화 층위에서 본 상투어의 기능 -‘사과, 감사, 호명하기를 중심으로" 한국문학언어학회 (53) : 169-207, 2010

15 황병순, "국어 인사말 연구" 배달말학회 (25) : 1-25, 1999

16 박진호, "관용표현의 통사론과 의미론" 국어학회 41 : 361-379, 2003

17 김하수, "話行의 個別 言語的 現象 - 韓國語에서의 나무라기와 사과하기 -" 인문학연구원 65 : 29-62, 1991

18 Barron, Anne, "“Ah no honestly we’re okay:” Learning to upgrade in a study abroad context" 4 : 129-166, 2007

19 시기자, "‘잘 모르겠음’ 답지와 추측에 대한 차별점수화가 차별기능검사와 피험자 응답 적합도에 미치는 영향" 교육과학연구소 38 (38): 53-74, 2007

20 Roever, Carsten, "What learners get for free: learning of routine formulae in ESL and EFL environments" 66 : 10-21, 2012

21 Bardovi-Harlig, K, "Understanding second language process" Multilingual Matters 205-222, 2008

22 Kecskes, Istvan, "Situation-bound utterances in L1 and L2" Mouton 2003

23 이학식, "SPSS 18.0 매뉴얼" 집현재 2011

24 Bardovi-Harlig, K, "Recognition of Conventional Expressions in L2Pragmatics" 12 : 141-162, 2010

25 Taguchi, Naoko, "Production of routines in L2 English: Effect of proficiency and study-abroad experience" 41 : 109-121, 2013

26 Ellis, "Formulaic Language in Native and Second Language Speakers: Psycholinguistics, Corpus Linguistics, and TESOL" 42 : 374-396, 2008

27 Bardovi-Harlig, K, "Effects of Intensity of Interaction, Proficiency, and Length of Stay on the Acquisition of Conventional Expressions in L2 Pragmatics" 8 : 347-384, 2011

28 Bardovi-Harlig, "Conventional expressions as a pragmalinguistic resource: Recognition and production of conventional expressions in L2pragmatics" 59 : 755-795, 2009

29 Kecskes, Istvan, "Conceptual fluency and the use of situation-bound utterances" 7 : 145-161, 2000