RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      What Drives Urban Development in China?

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100080655

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study uses data from 99 Chinese cities covering the decade from 2000 to 2010 to look at factors that drive urban development in China. There are data available to test standard measures of development like housing price. However, there are fundam...

      This study uses data from 99 Chinese cities covering the decade from 2000 to 2010 to look at factors that drive urban development in China. There are data available to test standard measures of development like housing price. However, there are fundamental problems with doing so due to a Chinese housing market shaped by factors like planned construction with waiting lists, housing as the best and most viable option for the typical Chinese with savings to invest, and the still-growing phenomenon of ghost cities. This study considers using housing price, regional gross production, GDP, employment, population, and disposable income to capture the reality of urban development over the past decade in China, settling on three models using regional gross production, GDP and disposable income. In particular, the study asks whether traditional economic factors, development of the new economy, the creative class model, or the rising power of cultural development is most associated with urban development in the major cities of China in the past decade. Using regression models, the study finds that tourism income was significantly positively related with all three measures of development, and fixed cultural investment was significantly positively related with regional gross production and GDP, though cultural policy spending did not. This provides some support for the role of cultural factors in development in China. Urban sprawl (measured by residential area/population) was found to be significant positively correlated to disposable income but not RGP or GDP, suggesting rise in disposable income also gives rise to empty housing used for investment. Change in the number of university students was significantly negatively related to GDP, implying that, without other controls for the cost of education, an increase in the current number of university students shifts resources away from economic activity.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • Introduction
      • Literature Review
      • Methodology
      • Discussion
      • Abstract
      • Introduction
      • Literature Review
      • Methodology
      • Discussion
      • Conclusion
      • References
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼