RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      中国民间中医师资格准入制度探讨 = Discussion on the Qualification Access System of Civil Traditional Chinese Medical Doctors in China

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107156212

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Civil traditional Chinese medical doctor is an important part of the team of traditional Chinese medical doctor in China. With their huge team scale and unique geographical advantages, they have made indelible contributions to the national medical and...

      Civil traditional Chinese medical doctor is an important part of the team of traditional Chinese medical doctor in China. With their huge team scale and unique geographical advantages, they have made indelible contributions to the national medical and health industry and national health. After the formation of education system of medical schools, the education of Chinese medical schools has been recognized by the public for its scientific, professional and standardizedcharacteristics.The system of civil traditional Chinese medical doctors trained by traditional methods of mentoring, family transmission, and self-study has been gradually declined. China’s vast rural areas and remote mountainous areas have a large population and serious shortage of medical resources. The state health department realizes that in order to alleviate the imbalance of urban and rural medical resources, they can only rely on civil traditional Chinese medical doctors who should be given legal medical qualifications.
      There are two main ways for civil traditional Chinese medical doctors to obtain legal medical qualifications: one is to obtain the qualifications of traditional Chinese medical doctors through the qualification examination system, and the other is to obtain the qualifications of people with expertise in traditional Chinese medicine through the qualification assessment system.
      Under the qualification examination system, civil traditional Chinese medical doctors can obtain the same practicing authority as academic traditional Chinese medical doctors after passing the qualification examination. This is not only unfair, but also easy to cause medical disputes, because civil traditional Chinese medical doctors are lack of theoretical knowledge. In contrast, the qualification assessment system is more suitable for the development characteristics of civil traditional Chinese medical doctors and is conducive to the inheritance of traditional Chinese medicine. Therefore, the author proposes to abolish the qualification examination system for civil traditional Chinese medical doctors, and at the same time modify the imperfections in the qualification assessment system. It is hope to promote the development of civil traditional Chinese medical doctors with a more reasonable and complete system, and form a multi-level traditional Chinese medicine doctor team with Chinese characteristics, and contribute more to the development of traditional Chinese medicine and national medical and health undertakings.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      中国民间中医师是中医师队伍的重要组成部分,其以庞大的队伍规模 及独特的地缘优势为国家医疗卫生事业以及国民健康做出了不可磨灭的 贡献. 医学院校教育体系形成后,中医学院校教育...

      中国民间中医师是中医师队伍的重要组成部分,其以庞大的队伍规模 及独特的地缘优势为国家医疗卫生事业以及国民健康做出了不可磨灭的 贡献. 医学院校教育体系形成后,中医学院校教育以科学化、专业化、标 准化的特点得到大众认可. 以传统师承、家传和自学方式培养的民间中医 师体系遭受打击并逐渐没落. 中国广大农村地区及偏远山区人口众多,医 疗资源严重不足,国家卫生部门意识到,想要缓解城乡医疗资源不均衡 的矛盾,需要依靠民间中医师,应该赋予民间中医师合法的行医资格.
      现阶段民间中医师取得合法行医资格的方式主要有两种:一是通过执 业医师资格考试制度取得执业中医师资格,二是通过中医医术确有专长 人员医师资格考核制度取得中医医术确有专长人员医师资格. 资格考试制 度下,民间中医师通过执业医师资格考试后便取得与学历中医师同样的 执业权限,这不仅有不公平之嫌,同时因民间中医师缺乏理论知识,容 易引发医疗纠纷. 相比之下,资格考核制度更适合民间中医师的发展特 色,有利于传统中医学的继承. 因此,笔者建议废止民间中医师资格考试 制度,同时对资格考核制度中的不完善之处予以修缮,以更合理完善的 制度体系促进民间中医师的发展,形成中国特色多层次中医师队伍,为 中医学和国家医疗卫生事业的发展贡献更多力量.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 정규원, "의사의 의료행위와 한의사의 한방의료행위의 범위와 한계" 대한의료법학회 19 (19): 3-24, 2018

      2 金永梅, "韩医教育对中医教育的启示" 21 (21): 2015

      3 吴颖雄, "简析《中医药法》的亮点与不足" 31 (31): 2017

      4 何京, "海峡两岸执业中医师考试资格对比分析" 38 (38): 2016

      5 刘剑锋, "民间中医药从业人员行医资格政策探讨" 19 (19): 2012

      6 魏子一, "民间中医师资格准入与执业规制研究" 27 (27): 2019

      7 彭博, "民国时期中医医事纠纷的法律调整(1912-1949)" 西南政法法学 2017

      8 赵士博, "新冠肺炎中医药诊治预防及地区治疗特色研究进展"

      9 曹东义, "新中国中医药曲折发展史:回眸70年,展望新时代" 18 (18): 2019

      10 朱建平, "新中国中医药发展70年" 14 (14): 2019

      1 정규원, "의사의 의료행위와 한의사의 한방의료행위의 범위와 한계" 대한의료법학회 19 (19): 3-24, 2018

      2 金永梅, "韩医教育对中医教育的启示" 21 (21): 2015

      3 吴颖雄, "简析《中医药法》的亮点与不足" 31 (31): 2017

      4 何京, "海峡两岸执业中医师考试资格对比分析" 38 (38): 2016

      5 刘剑锋, "民间中医药从业人员行医资格政策探讨" 19 (19): 2012

      6 魏子一, "民间中医师资格准入与执业规制研究" 27 (27): 2019

      7 彭博, "民国时期中医医事纠纷的法律调整(1912-1949)" 西南政法法学 2017

      8 赵士博, "新冠肺炎中医药诊治预防及地区治疗特色研究进展"

      9 曹东义, "新中国中医药曲折发展史:回眸70年,展望新时代" 18 (18): 2019

      10 朱建平, "新中国中医药发展70年" 14 (14): 2019

      11 张彩霞, "放宽民间老中医行医资质限制的几点建议" 28 (28): 2020

      12 刘宁, "推荐医师制度存在的问题与完善对策研究" 28 (28): 2020

      13 贾洪涛, "建国以来中医药政策法规问题研究与建议" 黑龙江中医药大学 2015

      14 杜明娟, "基层中医院中医人才流失困境及解决措施" 10 (10): 2019

      15 何晓明, "医学史视野下的中医" 7 (7): 2010

      16 吴颖雄, "传统中医师执业规则探讨" 27 (27): 2016

      17 彭博, "传统与近现代:中医师执业准入制度的法律评析" 29 (29): 2016

      18 汪建荣, "从《中医药法》角度看中医医师资格考核" 18 (18): 2017

      19 赵晓佩, "中医师承人员执业准入制度探讨:促进与规划并重" 22 (22): 2018

      20 李润生, "中医医术确有专长人员医师资格考核制的风险防控探析" 39 (39): 2018

      21 王大壮, "中医从业人员管理规制问题刍议" 24 (24): 2011

      22 李和伟, "《中医药法》视角下有关中医师承教育的思考" 58 (58): 2017

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2017-06-01 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean-Chinese Society of Law -> The Korea-China Society of Law KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.14 0.14 0.1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.1 0.08 0.241 0.08
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼