RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      현대 서사의 불안: 『프랑스 중위의 여자』에서의 역사주의와 반역사주의 사이의 긴장 = The Anxiety of the Modern Narrative: Tension between Historicism and Anti-Historicism in French Lieutenant`s Woman

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40093651

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      John Fowles’ French Lieutenant’s Woman offers a historical narrative whose formal and ideological uncertainty tends to frustrate critics that foreground critical theories and methodologies. This paper explores the complicated ways in which the novel evokes the historicity of human life and the textuality of history itself at the same time, while underscoring the specific points at which Fowles’ conception of art and history diverges from both realism and postmodernism. In the course of the narrative the self-conscious narrator declares that the author in modern times is no more a dictating god, but one that gives freedom to his creatures, i.e., his characters. They are free, we can infer, not only from the author but also from the allegedly ‘objective’ reality to which characters in a realist novel are still tightly bound. Nonetheless, their freedom is not unlimited because absolute freedom in characters and characterization means paradoxically the arbitrariness or omnipotency of authorship. The ‘reality principle’ thus returns to the new, ‘liberal’ godhead. Here lies Fowles’ dilemma. He is anxious to free his characters as fictive beings, and yet he has to respect their autonomy as if they were real beings. He wants to show the fictionality and reality of history in one and the same narrative. Accordingly, the narrative voice is torn between a parodic intention as regards the conventional, realist representation of temporalities and an enduring concern in the historiographical narrative that resists a sheer pastichization of the past. Through a variety of narrative devices the narrator intermingles the past and the present, fiction and reality, but the result is not an instantiation of the ‘self-flaunting anachronism’ (McHale) characteristic of postmodernist fiction. What we see in Fowles’ narrative, instead, is an attempt to evoke a new sense of history in which possibilities have as substantive significance as actualities. Of course, he does not work out this sense of history fully enough-his experiments with a historical vision remain unstable.
      번역하기

      John Fowles’ French Lieutenant’s Woman offers a historical narrative whose formal and ideological uncertainty tends to frustrate critics that foreground critical theories and methodologies. This paper explores the complicated ways in which the nov...

      John Fowles’ French Lieutenant’s Woman offers a historical narrative whose formal and ideological uncertainty tends to frustrate critics that foreground critical theories and methodologies. This paper explores the complicated ways in which the novel evokes the historicity of human life and the textuality of history itself at the same time, while underscoring the specific points at which Fowles’ conception of art and history diverges from both realism and postmodernism. In the course of the narrative the self-conscious narrator declares that the author in modern times is no more a dictating god, but one that gives freedom to his creatures, i.e., his characters. They are free, we can infer, not only from the author but also from the allegedly ‘objective’ reality to which characters in a realist novel are still tightly bound. Nonetheless, their freedom is not unlimited because absolute freedom in characters and characterization means paradoxically the arbitrariness or omnipotency of authorship. The ‘reality principle’ thus returns to the new, ‘liberal’ godhead. Here lies Fowles’ dilemma. He is anxious to free his characters as fictive beings, and yet he has to respect their autonomy as if they were real beings. He wants to show the fictionality and reality of history in one and the same narrative. Accordingly, the narrative voice is torn between a parodic intention as regards the conventional, realist representation of temporalities and an enduring concern in the historiographical narrative that resists a sheer pastichization of the past. Through a variety of narrative devices the narrator intermingles the past and the present, fiction and reality, but the result is not an instantiation of the ‘self-flaunting anachronism’ (McHale) characteristic of postmodernist fiction. What we see in Fowles’ narrative, instead, is an attempt to evoke a new sense of history in which possibilities have as substantive significance as actualities. Of course, he does not work out this sense of history fully enough-his experiments with a historical vision remain unstable.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼