RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      식물성 식품(plant-based foods)에 대한 채식주의자 및잡식주의자의 인식과 선택속성 = Perception and Choice Attribute of Vegetarians and Omnivores toward Plant-based Foods

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108120125

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study identifies the perceptions and choice attributes toward plant-based foods and identifies the differences betweenvegetarians and omnivores. We conducted an online survey of 245 vegetarians and 246 omnivores. The results reveal asignificant difference between vegetarians and omnivores. Compared to omnivores, vegetarians perceived that plant-basedfood products would be ‘good taste’, ‘animal-friendly’, and ‘consistent with their personal value’. Omnivore scores werehigher in the perception that it would be ‘good for health’ and ‘environment-friendly’. No statistically significant differencewas obtained between both diet groups when considering the factor of nutrition. When considering choice as an attributefor plant-based food products, vegetarians responded that ‘ingredients’ were the most important, while omnivoresresponded that ‘taste’ was the most important. These results can be used as basic data for developing and promoting plant based food products in South Korea.
      번역하기

      This study identifies the perceptions and choice attributes toward plant-based foods and identifies the differences betweenvegetarians and omnivores. We conducted an online survey of 245 vegetarians and 246 omnivores. The results reveal asignificant d...

      This study identifies the perceptions and choice attributes toward plant-based foods and identifies the differences betweenvegetarians and omnivores. We conducted an online survey of 245 vegetarians and 246 omnivores. The results reveal asignificant difference between vegetarians and omnivores. Compared to omnivores, vegetarians perceived that plant-basedfood products would be ‘good taste’, ‘animal-friendly’, and ‘consistent with their personal value’. Omnivore scores werehigher in the perception that it would be ‘good for health’ and ‘environment-friendly’. No statistically significant differencewas obtained between both diet groups when considering the factor of nutrition. When considering choice as an attributefor plant-based food products, vegetarians responded that ‘ingredients’ were the most important, while omnivoresresponded that ‘taste’ was the most important. These results can be used as basic data for developing and promoting plant based food products in South Korea.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김재철 ; 김경태 ; 김창근, "채식인의 BCAAs 섭취 후 지구성 운동시 나타나는 혈중 에너지 대사 물질의 변화" 한국체육학회 41 (41): 953-962, 2002

      2 Ruby M. B., "Vegetarianism. A blossoming field of study" 58 (58): 141-150, 2012

      3 Raghunathan R., "The unhealthy=tasty intuition and its effects on taste inferences, enjoyment, and choice of food products" 70 (70): 170-184, 2006

      4 Rosenfeld D. L., "The psychology of vegetarianism: Recent advances and future directions" 131 : 125-138, 2018

      5 Cliceri D., "The influence of psychological traits, beliefs and taste responsiveness on implicit attitudes toward plant-and animal-based dishes among vegetarians, flexitarians and omnivores" 68 : 276-291, 2018

      6 Bianchi F., "Restructuring physical micro-environments to reduce the demand for meat: a systematic review and qualitative comparative analysis" 2 (2): e384-e397, 2018

      7 Graça J., "Reducing meat consumption and following plant-based diets: Current evidence and future directions to inform integrated transitions" 91 : 380-390, 2019

      8 Poore, J., "Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers" 360 (360): 987-992, 2018

      9 McClements D. J., "Plantbased Milks: A Review of the Science Underpinning Their Design, Fabrication, and Performance" 18 (18): 2047-2067, 2019

      10 Sethi S., "Plant-based milk alternatives an emerging segment of functional beverages: a review" 53 (53): 3408-3423, 2016

      1 김재철 ; 김경태 ; 김창근, "채식인의 BCAAs 섭취 후 지구성 운동시 나타나는 혈중 에너지 대사 물질의 변화" 한국체육학회 41 (41): 953-962, 2002

      2 Ruby M. B., "Vegetarianism. A blossoming field of study" 58 (58): 141-150, 2012

      3 Raghunathan R., "The unhealthy=tasty intuition and its effects on taste inferences, enjoyment, and choice of food products" 70 (70): 170-184, 2006

      4 Rosenfeld D. L., "The psychology of vegetarianism: Recent advances and future directions" 131 : 125-138, 2018

      5 Cliceri D., "The influence of psychological traits, beliefs and taste responsiveness on implicit attitudes toward plant-and animal-based dishes among vegetarians, flexitarians and omnivores" 68 : 276-291, 2018

      6 Bianchi F., "Restructuring physical micro-environments to reduce the demand for meat: a systematic review and qualitative comparative analysis" 2 (2): e384-e397, 2018

      7 Graça J., "Reducing meat consumption and following plant-based diets: Current evidence and future directions to inform integrated transitions" 91 : 380-390, 2019

      8 Poore, J., "Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers" 360 (360): 987-992, 2018

      9 McClements D. J., "Plantbased Milks: A Review of the Science Underpinning Their Design, Fabrication, and Performance" 18 (18): 2047-2067, 2019

      10 Sethi S., "Plant-based milk alternatives an emerging segment of functional beverages: a review" 53 (53): 3408-3423, 2016

      11 Guerrero L., "Perception of traditional food products in six European regions using free word association" 21 (21): 225-233, 2010

      12 Ophuis P. A. O., "Perceived quality: A market driven and consumer oriented approach" 6 (6): 177-183, 1995

      13 Springmann M., "Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits" 562 (562): 519-525, 2018

      14 De Backer C. J., "Meat morals: relationship between meat consumption consumer attitudes towards human and animal welfare and moral behavior" 99 : 68-74, 2015

      15 Dagevos H., "Impact of meat consumption on health and environmental sustainability" IGI global 233-243, 2016

      16 Hopwood C. J., "Health, environmental, and animal rights motives for vegetarian eating" 15 (15): e0230609-, 2020

      17 Tilman D., "Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health" 515 (515): 518-522, 2014

      18 Cheah I., "Drivers and barriers toward reducing meat consumption" 149 : 104636-, 2020

      19 Peschel A. O., "Consumers’ associative networks of plant-based food product communications" 75 : 145-156, 2019

      20 Aschemann-Witzel J., "Consumer perception and trends about health and sustainability: trade-offs and synergies of two pivotal issues" 3 : 6-10, 2015

      21 Hong SI, "Comparison of Atherosclerotic Heart Disease Risks between Vegetarian and Non - vegetarian" 51 (51): 45-52, 1996

      22 Reipurth M.F., "Barriers and facilitators towards adopting a more plant-based diet in a sample of Danish consumers" 73 : 288-292, 2019

      23 Turnwald B. P., "Association between indulgent descriptions and vegetable consumption: Twisted carrots and dynamite beets" 177 (177): 1216-1218, 2017

      24 Hopwood C. J., "An investigation of plant-based dietary motives among vegetarians and omnivores" 7 (7): 19010-, 2021

      25 Cha BK, "A Comparative Study of Relationships among Eating Behavior, Intake Frequency of Food Group and Cardiovascular disease Related Factors in Vegetariand and Non-Vegetarians" 30 (30): 183-192, 2001

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-12-16 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of The Korean Society of Dietary Culture -> Journal of The Korean Society of Food Culture KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.8 0.8 0.87
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.87 0.89 1.461 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼