RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Two Brazils: In Search of New Order and Progress

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106592651

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Since the end of the 20th century, the state of democracy has become increasingly complicated. In many parts of the world, traditional representative democracy is frequently influenced by “street politics” often divided into extremes. There are two contradictory views of this phenomenon: as an “extension of democracy,” or as a “crisis of democracy.” The slogan inscribed in the middle of Brazilian flag is “Ordem e Progresso,” which means in English “order and progress.” However, Brazilians say their country is only "progressing" at night when politicians sleep. In addition to the question of why countries succeed and why they fail, the growing inequality and polarization within a country adds to the uncertainty of the future. This article examines whether the collapse of the leftist regime, which has been in power in Brazil for 15 years, represents an “edge of democracy” or whether the ruling of the leftist regime was a “crisis of democracy,” as argued by the currently ruling right-wing forces. It aims to project the possibility of integration and the “new order and progress” they are looking for in a severely divided society.
      번역하기

      Since the end of the 20th century, the state of democracy has become increasingly complicated. In many parts of the world, traditional representative democracy is frequently influenced by “street politics” often divided into extremes. There are tw...

      Since the end of the 20th century, the state of democracy has become increasingly complicated. In many parts of the world, traditional representative democracy is frequently influenced by “street politics” often divided into extremes. There are two contradictory views of this phenomenon: as an “extension of democracy,” or as a “crisis of democracy.” The slogan inscribed in the middle of Brazilian flag is “Ordem e Progresso,” which means in English “order and progress.” However, Brazilians say their country is only "progressing" at night when politicians sleep. In addition to the question of why countries succeed and why they fail, the growing inequality and polarization within a country adds to the uncertainty of the future. This article examines whether the collapse of the leftist regime, which has been in power in Brazil for 15 years, represents an “edge of democracy” or whether the ruling of the leftist regime was a “crisis of democracy,” as argued by the currently ruling right-wing forces. It aims to project the possibility of integration and the “new order and progress” they are looking for in a severely divided society.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 신환종, "브라질 정치경제 위기와 투자사이클" 한국 포르투갈-브라질 학회 14 (14): 31-67, 2017

      2 "World Inequality Report 2018"

      3 Bae Young-Dae, "Why the Movie ‘Parasite’ Is Uncomfortable"

      4 Han Sang-kwon, "Why democracy, not liberal democracy"

      5 Acemoglu, Daron, "Why Nations Fail" Sigongsa 2012

      6 Exame, "Um ano de mandato depois, qual é a base do governo Bolsonaro?"

      7 Reichard, Richard, "Two Brazils" 251 (251): 36-37, 1966

      8 Hong Soon-chul, "The world is flat? Not bumpy"

      9 Friedman, Thomas, "The World Is Flat" Chanhae 2006

      10 Maxwell, Kenneth, "The Two Brazils" 23 (23): 50-60, 1999

      1 신환종, "브라질 정치경제 위기와 투자사이클" 한국 포르투갈-브라질 학회 14 (14): 31-67, 2017

      2 "World Inequality Report 2018"

      3 Bae Young-Dae, "Why the Movie ‘Parasite’ Is Uncomfortable"

      4 Han Sang-kwon, "Why democracy, not liberal democracy"

      5 Acemoglu, Daron, "Why Nations Fail" Sigongsa 2012

      6 Exame, "Um ano de mandato depois, qual é a base do governo Bolsonaro?"

      7 Reichard, Richard, "Two Brazils" 251 (251): 36-37, 1966

      8 Hong Soon-chul, "The world is flat? Not bumpy"

      9 Friedman, Thomas, "The World Is Flat" Chanhae 2006

      10 Maxwell, Kenneth, "The Two Brazils" 23 (23): 50-60, 1999

      11 Weitz, Richard, "The New Order in Brazil" 3 (3): 10-12, 1981

      12 Scheidel Walter, "The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality" Ecolibro 2017

      13 Kang Jun-man, "Republic of Korea, A Special Country" People and History 2011

      14 Banerjee, Abhijit, "Poor Economics: a Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty" Senggakyeunguso 2012

      15 Duflo, Ester, "Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty" Thought Research Eitor 2012

      16 Kang Jun-man, "People and Thoughts" People and History 37-58, 2011

      17 Schneider, Ben Ross, "New Order and Progress" Oxford University Press 2016

      18 Vaz, Isadora Campos, "Mineração de Tweets no Apoio à Análise da Disputa Eleitoral Presidencial" Faculdade de Informação e Comunicação-UFG 20-25, 2018

      19 Lee Jae-won, "Leftist economist Piketty ‘Brazil is Sustainable to Reduce Inequality’"

      20 Ziegler, Jean, "Le Capitalisme explique a ma apetite-file" Sigongsa 2018

      21 "Informe"

      22 Yoon Sung-seok, "Inequality and Labor Diaspora of Brazilian Democracy" 6 (6): 213-237, 2012

      23 Im Doo Bin, "Impeachment of Brazil's President, Similar to South Korea but Different" 8 : 56-59, 2017

      24 Epoch Times, "First Year of Bolsonaro’s Government: What is New in Brazil?"

      25 "E-Stat program"

      26 Reeves, Richard, "Dream Hoarders" Mineumsa 2019

      27 Park Min-ji, "Disabled Parking Lot Sad and Cut Guard"

      28 "Digital in 2018: The Americas"

      29 Melo, Marcus A., "Democratic Brazil Revisited" University of Pittsburgh Press 161-184, 2008

      30 Lee Jin woo, "Democracy is liberal democracy"

      31 Choi Jung-muk, "Data Age, How to Read People's Minds" Hans Content 2016

      32 Piketty, Thomas, "Capital in the Twenty-First Century" Geulhangari 2014

      33 Jang Seok-Jun, "Candle and Populism: Populism is Not Just Bad"

      34 Sharma, Ruchir, "Breakout Nations" Tornado 2012

      35 Kim Jae-soon, "Brazilian Protests Seen at the Site to Get Rid of Corruption" (128) : 153-155, 2013

      36 Cho Hee-moon, "Brazilian Legal Order and Democracy Seen through Impeachment" 2016

      37 Bethell, Leslie, "Brazil: Essays on History and Politics" School of Advanced Study, University of London 195-222, 2018

      38 Castro, Belmiro V. J., "Brazil is not for Amateurs" Xliberis 2002

      39 Veja edição 2664, "Bolsonaro empata com Lula no primeiro turno; Moro supera com folga o petista"

      40 Bethell, Leslie, "Bethel, Brazil: Essays on History and Politics" School of Advanced Study, University of London 147-174, 2018

      41 Na Yun-seok, "2019 Nobel Prize in Economics. 'Laziness Causes Poverty', Suggests a New Approach to Alleviating Poverty"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-09-16 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2006-06-12 학회명변경 영문명 : Institute for Humanities and Social Sciences -> Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.59 0.59 0.54
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.47 0.44 0.837 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼