RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCI SCIE SCOPUS

      Combination of Antiemetics for the Prevention of PostoperativeNausea and Vomiting in High-Risk Patients

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104776214

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      It was previously reported that the Korean predictive model could be used to identify patients at high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). This study investigated whether PONV in the high-risk and very high-risk patients identified by th...

      It was previously reported that the Korean predictive model could be used to identify patients at high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). This study investigated whether PONV in the high-risk and very high-risk patients identified by the Korean predictive model could be prevented by multiple prophylactic antiemetics.

      A total of 2,456 patients were selected from our previous PONV study and assigned to the control group, and 374 new patients were recruited consecutively to the treatment group. Patients in each group were subdivided into two risk groups according to the Korean predictive model: high-risk group and very high-risk group.

      Patients in the treatment group received an antiemetic combination of dexamethasone 5 mg (minutes after induction) and ondansetron 4 mg (30 min before the end of surgery). The incidences of PONV were examined at two hours after the surgery in the postanesthetic care unit and, additionally, at 24 hr after the surgery in the ward, and were analyzed for any differences between the control and treatment groups. The overall incidence of PONV decreased significantly from 52.1% to 23.0% (p≤0.001) after antiemetic prophylaxis. Specifically, the incidence decreased from 47.3% to 19.4% (p≤0.001) in the high-risk group and from 61.3% to 28.3% (p≤0.001) in the very high-risk group. Both groups showed a similar degree of relative risk reductions: 59.0% vs. 53.8% in the high-risk and very high-risk groups, respectively. The results of our study showed that the antiemetic prophylaxis with the combination of dexamethasone and ondansetron was effective in reducing the occurrence of PONV in both high-risk and very high-risk patients.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "Watcha M. Consensus guidelines for managing postoperative naConsensus guidelines for managing postoperative nausea and vomitingusea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 2003" 97 : 62-71, 2003

      2 "The cost-effective management of postoperative nauseaand vomiting" 92 : 931-933, 2000

      3 "Strategies for postoperative nausea and vomiting" 18 : 693-701, 2004

      4 "Risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting" 102 : 1884-1898, 2006

      5 "Postoperative nausea and vomiting: prophy-laxis versus treatment" 89 : 1337-1339, 1999

      6 "Food and drug administration black box warningon the perioperative use of droperidol: a review of the cases" 96 : 1377-1379, 2003

      7 "Droperidol and5-HT3-receptor antagonists, alone or in combination, for prophylaxisof postoperative nausea and vomiting. A meta-analysis of randomised882 E.J. Kim, J.S. Ko, C.S. Kim, et al.controlled trials" 44 : 1252-1257, 2000

      8 "Dexamethasone for the prevention ofpostoperative nausea and vomiting: a quantitative systematic review" 90 : 186-194, 2000

      9 "Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic antiemetic therapywith ondansetron, droperidol, or placebo" 92 : 958-967, 2000

      10 "Comparison of predictive models for postoperative nausea and vomiting" 88 : 234-240, 2002

      1 "Watcha M. Consensus guidelines for managing postoperative naConsensus guidelines for managing postoperative nausea and vomitingusea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 2003" 97 : 62-71, 2003

      2 "The cost-effective management of postoperative nauseaand vomiting" 92 : 931-933, 2000

      3 "Strategies for postoperative nausea and vomiting" 18 : 693-701, 2004

      4 "Risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting" 102 : 1884-1898, 2006

      5 "Postoperative nausea and vomiting: prophy-laxis versus treatment" 89 : 1337-1339, 1999

      6 "Food and drug administration black box warningon the perioperative use of droperidol: a review of the cases" 96 : 1377-1379, 2003

      7 "Droperidol and5-HT3-receptor antagonists, alone or in combination, for prophylaxisof postoperative nausea and vomiting. A meta-analysis of randomised882 E.J. Kim, J.S. Ko, C.S. Kim, et al.controlled trials" 44 : 1252-1257, 2000

      8 "Dexamethasone for the prevention ofpostoperative nausea and vomiting: a quantitative systematic review" 90 : 186-194, 2000

      9 "Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic antiemetic therapywith ondansetron, droperidol, or placebo" 92 : 958-967, 2000

      10 "Comparison of predictive models for postoperative nausea and vomiting" 88 : 234-240, 2002

      11 "Comparativeefficacy and safety of ondansetron, droperidol, and metoclopramidefor preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting: a meta-analysis" 88 : 1370-1379, 1999

      12 "Combination therapy for postoperative nauseaand vomiting - a more effective prophylaxis?" 9 : 59-71, 2001

      13 "A survey of postoper-ative nausea and vomiting" 52 : 443-449, 1997

      14 "A simpli-fied risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting:conclusions from cross-validations between two centers" 91 : 693-700, 1999

      15 "A risk adapted approach reduces the overall institutionalincidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting" 51 : 13-19, 2004

      16 "A randomized comparison of a multimodal management strategy versus combination antiemetics for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting" 99 : 77-81, 2004

      17 "A korean predictive model forpostoperative nausea and vomiting" 20 : 811-815, 2005

      18 "A factorial trial of six interventions for theprevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting" 350 : 2441-2451, 2004

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 SCI 등재 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.48 0.37 1.06
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.85 0.75 0.691 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼