이 논문은 WTO분쟁해결기관의 GATT 제20조 “필요한” 조치에 대한 판단에 대해 비례성원칙을 적용하여 분석하고 평가한 것이다. WTO 분쟁해결기관이 GATT 제20조 필요성을 판단하는 기존의 심사...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100123180
2014
Korean
WTO ; GATT 제20조 ; 필요성 ; 경제적 목적 ; 비경제적 목적 ; 법원칙규범 충돌 ; 비례성원칙 ; 비교형량 ; 형량법칙 ; 최적화명령 ; 중요도 공식 ; 재량 ; GATT Article XX ; weighing and balancing ; proportionality ; suitability ; necessity ; proportionality stricro sensu ; balancing ; legal principles ; conflict ; optimization ; discretion
KCI등재
학술저널
67-96(30쪽)
2
0
상세조회0
다운로드국문 초록 (Abstract)
이 논문은 WTO분쟁해결기관의 GATT 제20조 “필요한” 조치에 대한 판단에 대해 비례성원칙을 적용하여 분석하고 평가한 것이다. WTO 분쟁해결기관이 GATT 제20조 필요성을 판단하는 기존의 심사...
이 논문은 WTO분쟁해결기관의 GATT 제20조 “필요한” 조치에 대한 판단에 대해 비례성원칙을 적용하여 분석하고 평가한 것이다. WTO 분쟁해결기관이 GATT 제20조 필요성을 판단하는 기존의 심사기준은 (최소무역제한 대안조치+weighing and balancing) 비례성원칙의 적합성원칙, 필요성원칙, 좁은 의미의 비례성원칙을 적용한 판단과 매우 유사하다. 그러나 WTO의 심사기준은 필요성원칙의 최소제한 수단만을 판단하는 것도 아니고, 비례성원칙의 적합성, 필요성, 좁은 의미의 비례성 원칙을 논리적으로 판단하는 것도 아니어서 분쟁해결 심사기준으로서 정체가 불분명한 상태에 머물러 있다. 따라서 WTO 분쟁해결기관은 묵시적으로 수용하고 있는 비례성원칙에 대한 적용을 명시적으로 밝히고, 비례성원칙의 세 가지 부분원칙을 적용한 분석에 대해 좀 더 명확히 논리적으로 논증하는 것이 필요하다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This article analyses and assesses the applicability of the principle of proportionality for the jurisprudence of determining the “necessary” measures of GATT Article XX by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body. The WTO panels and Appellate Bodies, whil...
This article analyses and assesses the applicability of the principle of proportionality for the jurisprudence of determining the “necessary” measures of GATT Article XX by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body. The WTO panels and Appellate Bodies, while deciding whether a WTO Member’s measure is necessary, have been used the criteria of the least or less trade restrictive alternative measures along with weighing and balancing of a series of elements since Korea-Beef case, which is very much similar to the proportionality analysis. However, the criteria by the WTO DSB remains in vague because they are neither only conducting the process of the principle of necessity, which looks for the least or less trade restrictive alternative measure, nor logically conducting the proportionality analysis through the process of analyzing three sub-principles of suitability, of necessity, and of proportionality stricto sensu. Therefore, WTO DSB should clearly recognize the principle of proportionality as the principle of WTO law and develop the logical reasoning of it.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 이준일, "헌법상 비례성원칙" 한국공법학회 37 (37): 25-43, 2009
2 정종섭, "중요도 공식" 44 (44): 2003
3 김도균, "권리의 문법" 박영사 2008
4 Rivers, Julian, "Transnational Constitutionalism:International and European Models" University Press 2007
5 Marceau, Gabrielle, "The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade: A Map of the World Trade Organization Law of Domestic Regulation of Goods" 36 (36): 2002
6 Emiliou, Nicholas, "The Principle of Proportionality in European Law: A Comparative Study" Kluwer Law International 1996
7 Dworkin, Ronald, "Taking Rights Seriously" Harvard University Press 1978
8 Barak, Aharon, "Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations" Cambridge University Press 2012
9 Sweet, Alec Stone, "Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism" 47 : 2008
10 Alexy, Robert, "On Balancing and Subsumption: A Structural Comparison" 16 (16): 2003
1 이준일, "헌법상 비례성원칙" 한국공법학회 37 (37): 25-43, 2009
2 정종섭, "중요도 공식" 44 (44): 2003
3 김도균, "권리의 문법" 박영사 2008
4 Rivers, Julian, "Transnational Constitutionalism:International and European Models" University Press 2007
5 Marceau, Gabrielle, "The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade: A Map of the World Trade Organization Law of Domestic Regulation of Goods" 36 (36): 2002
6 Emiliou, Nicholas, "The Principle of Proportionality in European Law: A Comparative Study" Kluwer Law International 1996
7 Dworkin, Ronald, "Taking Rights Seriously" Harvard University Press 1978
8 Barak, Aharon, "Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations" Cambridge University Press 2012
9 Sweet, Alec Stone, "Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism" 47 : 2008
10 Alexy, Robert, "On Balancing and Subsumption: A Structural Comparison" 16 (16): 2003
11 Rosenberg, Maurice, "Judicial Discretion of the Trial Court, Viewed from Above" 22 (22): 1971
12 Alpa, Guido, "General Principles of Law" 1 (1): 1994
13 "GATT Panel Report, United States Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930"
14 "GATT Panel Report, Thailand–Restrictions on Importation of and Internal Taxes on Cigarettes"
15 Alexy, Robert, "Die Gewichtsformel, in Gedächtnisschrift für Jürgen Sonnenschein" De Gruyter Recht 2003
16 Blum, John D., "Cost-Benefit Analysis" Regulating Health Care: The Struggle for Control 33 (33): 1980
17 Alexy, Robert, "Constitutional Rights, Balancing, and Rationality" 16 (16): 2003
18 Kirk, Jeremy, "Constitutional Guarantees, Characterisation and Concept of Proportionality" 21 (21): 1997
19 Weiler, J. H. H., "Comment: Brazil–Measures Affecting Imports of Retreaded Tyres (DS322) Prepared for the ALI Project on the Case Law of the WTO" 8 (8): 2009
20 Habermas, Jürgen, "Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy" MIT Press 1996
21 Alexy, Robert, "Balancing, Constitutional Review, and Representation" 3 (3): 2005
22 "BVerfGE 7, 377- Apotheken-Urteil"
23 "BVerfGE 7, 198 - Lüth"
24 Pulido, Carlos Bernal, "Arguing Fundamental Rights" Springer 2006
25 "Appellate Body Report, United States–Measures Affecting the Cross Border Supply of Gambling and Betting Services"
26 "Appellate Body Report, Korea–Measures Affecting Imports of Fresh, Chilled and Frozen Beef"
27 "Appellate Body Report, European Communities–Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos Containing Products"
28 "Appellate Body Report, Brazil–Measures Affecting Imports of Retreaded Tyres"
29 Moshe Cohen-Eliya, "American Balancing and German Proportionality: The historical origins" 8 (8): 2010
30 Sweet, Alec Stone, "All Things in Proportion? American Rights Doctrine and the Problem of Balancing" 60 (60): 2011
31 Alexy, Robert, "A Theory of Constitutional Rights" Oxford University Press 2002
32 Rivers, Julian, "A Theory of Constitutional Rights" Oxford University Press 2002
캐나다-재생에너지 발전차액지원제도 사건 판정에 대한 비판적 고찰
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-04-06 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 한국국제경제법학회 -> (사)한국국제경제법학회영문명 : International Economic Law Association of Korea -> Korean Society of International Economic Law | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2012-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 1.18 | 1.18 | 0.96 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
1.1 | 0.91 | 1.373 | 0.13 |