RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      두 가지 장비를 이용한 각막 지형도 검사의 비교 = Comparison of Corneal Measurement Values between Two Types of Topography

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100524173

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: To compare the corneal measurements of Sirius and Pentacam in normal cornea and post-corneal refractive surgery patients. Methods: Subjects were tested by Pentacam (OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany), and Sirius (CSO, Firenze, Italy). Measurements inc...

      Purpose: To compare the corneal measurements of Sirius and Pentacam in normal cornea and post-corneal refractive surgery patients. Methods: Subjects were tested by Pentacam (OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany), and Sirius (CSO, Firenze, Italy). Measurements included central corneal thickness, thinnest corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber volume, iridocorneal angle, corneal volume, pupil size, and curvature of cornea. Results: A total of 88 eyes from 44 patients were included in the present study. When comparing Sirius and Pentacam in the normal cornea, corneal thickness (p = 0.693), thinnest corneal thickness (p = 0.386), anterior chamber depth (p = 0.155), anterior chamber volume (p = 0.650), and pupil diameter (p = 0.124) did not differ significantly. Corneal curvature (p ˂ 0.001), corneal volume (p = 0.023), and iridocorneal angle (p ˂ 0.001) were statistically different. When comparing Sirius and Pentacam in post-corneal refractive surgery patients, corneal thickness (p = 0.056) did not differ significantly. There was a statistical difference in corneal curvature (p ˂ 0.001), thinnest corneal thickness (p = 0.019), anterior chamber depth (p ˂ 0.001), anterior chamber volume (p ˂ 0.001), iridocorneal angle (p ˂ 0.001), corneal volume (p ˂ 0.001), and pupil diameter (p ˂ 0.001). Conclusions: Anterior segment measurements with Pentacam and Sirius showed differences in post-corneal refractive surgery patients.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 신영주, "두 가지 각막지형도 검사에서의 각막 측정값 비교" 대한안과학회 48 (48): 637-641, 2007

      2 Kawamorita T, "Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement characteristics of rotating Scheimpflug photography and scanning-slit corneal topography for corneal power measurement" 35 : 127-133, 2009

      3 Jain R, "Repeatability of corneal parameters with Pentacam after laser in situ keratomileusis" 55 : 341-347, 2007

      4 Savini G, "Repeatability of automatic measurements performed by a dual Scheimpflug analyzer in unoperated and post-refractive surgery eyes" 37 : 302-309, 2011

      5 Savini G, "Repeatability of automatic measurements by a new Scheimpflug camera combined with Placido topography" 37 : 1809-1816, 2011

      6 Kawamorita T, "Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal curvature measurements using the Pentacam and Keratron topography systems" 25 : 539-544, 2009

      7 Bedei A, "Repeatability and agreement of 2 Scheimpflug analyzers in measuring the central corneal thickness and anterior chamber angle, volume, and depth" 22 (22): 29-32, 2012

      8 Wegener A, "Photography of the anterior eye segment according to Scheimpflug's principle: options and limitations - a review" 37 : 144-154, 2009

      9 Cairns G, "Orbscan computerized topography: attributes, applications, and limitations" 31 : 205-220, 2005

      10 Klyce SD, "Corneal topography and the new wave" 19 : 723-729, 2000

      1 신영주, "두 가지 각막지형도 검사에서의 각막 측정값 비교" 대한안과학회 48 (48): 637-641, 2007

      2 Kawamorita T, "Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement characteristics of rotating Scheimpflug photography and scanning-slit corneal topography for corneal power measurement" 35 : 127-133, 2009

      3 Jain R, "Repeatability of corneal parameters with Pentacam after laser in situ keratomileusis" 55 : 341-347, 2007

      4 Savini G, "Repeatability of automatic measurements performed by a dual Scheimpflug analyzer in unoperated and post-refractive surgery eyes" 37 : 302-309, 2011

      5 Savini G, "Repeatability of automatic measurements by a new Scheimpflug camera combined with Placido topography" 37 : 1809-1816, 2011

      6 Kawamorita T, "Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal curvature measurements using the Pentacam and Keratron topography systems" 25 : 539-544, 2009

      7 Bedei A, "Repeatability and agreement of 2 Scheimpflug analyzers in measuring the central corneal thickness and anterior chamber angle, volume, and depth" 22 (22): 29-32, 2012

      8 Wegener A, "Photography of the anterior eye segment according to Scheimpflug's principle: options and limitations - a review" 37 : 144-154, 2009

      9 Cairns G, "Orbscan computerized topography: attributes, applications, and limitations" 31 : 205-220, 2005

      10 Klyce SD, "Corneal topography and the new wave" 19 : 723-729, 2000

      11 Hashemi H, "Corneal changes after laser refractive surgery for myopia: comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam findings" 33 : 841-847, 2007

      12 Buehl W, "Comparison of three methods of measuring corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth" 141 : 7-12, 2006

      13 Savini G, "Comparison of anterior segment measurements by 3 Scheimpflug tomographers and 1 Placido corneal topographer" 37 : 1679-1685, 2011

      14 Menassa N, "Comparison and reproducibility of corneal thickness and curvature readings obtained by the Galilei and the Orbscan II analysis systems" 34 : 1742-1747, 2008

      15 Li H, "Comparative study of central corneal thickness measurement with slit-lamp optical coherence tomography and visante optical coherence tomography" 115 : 796-801, 2008

      16 Nilforoushan MR, "Comparative evaluation of refractive surgery candidates with Placido topography, Orbscan II, Pentacam, and wavefront analysis" 34 : 623-631, 2008

      17 Shankar H, "Anterior segment biometry with the Pentacam: comprehensive assessment of repeatability of automated measurements" 34 : 103-113, 2008

      18 Belin MW, "An introduction to understanding elevation- based topography: how elevation data are displayed - a review" 37 : 14-29, 2009

      19 Corneal topography, "American Academy of Ophthalmology" 106 : 1628-1638, 1999

      20 Savini G, "Accuracy of Scheimpflug corneal power measurements for intraocular lens power calculation" 35 : 1193-1197, 2009

      21 González Pérez J, "Accuracy and precision of EyeSys and Orbscan systems on calibrated spherical test surfaces" 30 : 74-78, 2004

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.22 0.22 0.22
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.23 0.23 0.366 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼