RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      TRIZ에서 모순해결전략의 유형 및 적용

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101745743

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The study proposes multiple TRIZ contradiction solution strategies for addressing PC (Physical Contradiction) and TC (Technical Contradiction) by implementing TRIZ cause-and-effect tree. The problem associated with TC of the ends is solved by PC of me...

      The study proposes multiple TRIZ contradiction solution strategies for addressing PC (Physical Contradiction) and TC (Technical Contradiction) by implementing TRIZ cause-and-effect tree. The problem associated with TC of the ends is solved by PC of means which employs a causal relationship between causes and effects. The TRIZ contradiction solution strategies demonstrated in this research are classified into 3 types of combined strategy as follows: 1. To-Be PC and AS-Is PC, 2.To-Be PC and As-Is TC, 3.As-Is PC and To-Be TC. The combined strategy of To-Be PC and As-Is PC is similar to a divide-and-conquer technique. This strategy adopts parallel strategies using 4 separation principles in time, in space, between parts and the whole, and upon condition of two reversed-PCs. Moreover, its application elucidates the conflict relationship of two TCs from the study. The integrated 4 separation principles and 40 inventive principles present an effective synergy effect from the combination, and further addresses the problems in the TRIZ contradiction resolution strategies. Combined strategy of To-Be PC and As-Is TC implements the 40 inventive principles that To-Be PC of the means resolves the As-Is TC of the ends. Combined strategy of As-Is PC and To-Be TC also uses inventive principles to the As-Is PC of the means to solve the To-Be TC of the ends. In addition, propositional and logical relationship of necessary and sufficient conditions between TC and PC is used to support the validity of 3 TRIZ contradiction solution strategies. In addition, 3 other strategies of necessary and sufficient conditions validate the contraposition relationship of the truth table. This study discusses TRIZ case studies from National Quality Circle Contest from the years between 2011 and 2014 to provide the usage guidelines of TRIZ contradiction solutions for quality purposes. Examining analysis from the case studies and investigating combined strategies allows the users to obtain comprehensive understanding.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 서 론
      • 2. TRIZ 모순행렬과 해결원리
      • 3. TRIZ에서 모순해결전략의 유형
      • 4. TRIZ 모순해결전략의 적용사례분석
      • 4.1 To-Be PC와 As-Is PC 통합 모순해결전략의 적용사례분석
      • 1. 서 론
      • 2. TRIZ 모순행렬과 해결원리
      • 3. TRIZ에서 모순해결전략의 유형
      • 4. TRIZ 모순해결전략의 적용사례분석
      • 4.1 To-Be PC와 As-Is PC 통합 모순해결전략의 적용사례분석
      • 4.2 To-Be PC와 As-Is TC 통합모순해결전략의 적용사례분석
      • 4.3 As-Is PC와 To-Be TC 통합모순해결전략의 적용사례분석
      • 4.4 모순해결전략사례별 40가지 발명원리의유형
      • 5. 결론
      • 6. References
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "http://www.q-korea.net"

      2 "http://www.osaka-gu.ac.jp/php/nakagawa/TRIZ/ eTRIZ/eforum"

      3 "http://www.google.co.kr"

      4 "http://tocforcollege.com/downloads/TOC%20tp % 20in%Academia.pdf"

      5 "http://ebooks.narotama.ac.id/filesmechanical%20 Engineers%20Handbook%20"

      6 Ean K. C., "Thinking Smart : Applying the Theory of Constraints in Development Thinking Skills" Coronet Books Inc 2005

      7 Cox Ⅲ J., "Theory of Constraints Handbook" MeGraw Hill Professional 2010

      8 Shroeder-Saulnier D., "The Power of Paradox : Harness the Energy of Competing Ideas to Uncover Radically Innovative Solutions" Career Press 2014

      9 Hipple J., "The Ideal Result" Springer 2012

      10 Goldratt E. M., "The Choice" The North River Press Publishing Corporation 2012

      1 "http://www.q-korea.net"

      2 "http://www.osaka-gu.ac.jp/php/nakagawa/TRIZ/ eTRIZ/eforum"

      3 "http://www.google.co.kr"

      4 "http://tocforcollege.com/downloads/TOC%20tp % 20in%Academia.pdf"

      5 "http://ebooks.narotama.ac.id/filesmechanical%20 Engineers%20Handbook%20"

      6 Ean K. C., "Thinking Smart : Applying the Theory of Constraints in Development Thinking Skills" Coronet Books Inc 2005

      7 Cox Ⅲ J., "Theory of Constraints Handbook" MeGraw Hill Professional 2010

      8 Shroeder-Saulnier D., "The Power of Paradox : Harness the Energy of Competing Ideas to Uncover Radically Innovative Solutions" Career Press 2014

      9 Hipple J., "The Ideal Result" Springer 2012

      10 Goldratt E. M., "The Choice" The North River Press Publishing Corporation 2012

      11 최성운, "TRIZ 인과관계 모순트리와 통합원리를 이용한 물리적 모순의 창의적 해결방안의 고찰 및 적용방안" 대한안전경영과학회 17 (17): 215-228, 2015

      12 Hynix Learning Center, "TRIZ User"

      13 Conradie I., "TOC and TRIZ : Using a Dual-Methodological Approach to Solve a Forest Harvesting Problem" 2005

      14 Kishira Y., "TOC Thinking Process" Diamond Inc 2008

      15 Stratton R., "Systematic Innovation and the Underlying Principles Behind TRIZ and TOC" 139 : 120-126, 2003

      16 Maimon O., "Sufficient Conditions for Inventive Solutions" 29 (29): 349-361, 1999

      17 Rantanen K., "Simplified TRIZ" Auerbach Publications 2007

      18 Mann D., "Physical Contradictions and Evaporating Clouds" 2000

      19 Stratton R., "Managing the Trade-off Implication of Global Supply" 103 : 667-679, 2003

      20 Hyun J., "Logical Interpretation about Problem Types and Solution Stratigies of the Butterfly Model for the Automation of Contradiction-based Problem Solving" 236-241, 2014

      21 Goldratt E.M., "It's Not Luck" North River Press 1994

      22 Orloff M. A., "Inventive Thinking Through TRIZ" Springer 2006

      23 Pospesel H., "Introduction to Logic : Propositional Logic" Pearson 1999

      24 Gensler H. J., "Introduction to Logic" Routledge 2012

      25 Pfeifer T., "Innovative Process Chain Optimization - Utilizing the Tools of TRIZ and TOC for Manufacturing" 2004

      26 Li G., "Idea Generation for Fuzzy Front End Using TRIZ and TOC" 590-594, 2006

      27 Mann D., "Hands on Systematic Innovation for Business & Management" IFR Press 2007

      28 Lucus J., "Broaden the Vision and Narrow the Focus : Managing in a World of Paradox" Praeger 2005

      29 Feduko J., "Behind the Cloud : Enhancig Logical Thinking" TOC Strategic Solutions 2014

      30 Lin L., "An Algorithm to Extract the Generalized Physical Contrandiction" 129-135, 2014

      31 Ariyur K. B., "A Mathematical Foundation for TRIZ Methods : Resolving Contradictions and Idealization" 409-411, 2011

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2016-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-08-29 학술지명변경 한글명 : 안전경영과학회지 -> 대한안전경영과학회지
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Korea Safety Management & Science
      KCI등재후보
      2005-03-30 학회명변경 한글명 : 안전경영과학회 -> 대한안전경영과학회
      영문명 : Safety Management & Science -> Korea Institute of Safety Management and Science
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.15 0.15 0.2
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.2 0.2 0.333 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼