창조된 역사,웨스트팔리아조약의 함의에 대한 비판적 고찰 = A Crafted History, A Critical Review on the Implication of the Treaty of Westphalia

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

International law scholars would not have any difficulty to agree with the notion that the very birth of international system composed of states would be traced back to the conclusion of the Treaty of Westphalia. Also, if international law scholars would be asked to pick up one event that could not be perishable forever, the answer to this would be going to the peace of Westphalia. Put it differently, the term ‘Westphalia’ could be regarded as the starting point of international law and the turning point of international system. Generally, the Treaty of Westphalia is understood as revolutionary historical records which witnessed the collapse of the universal spiritual actor (the Holy Roman Empire)
and the rise of individual secular actor (Sovereign States). The argument that the medieval feudal system of world was vaporized and modern state system of world was emerged at the moment of conclusion of the Treaty of Westphalia would be accepted as the inexorable truth among scholars of international law and international relations.
Through heuristic reproduction, the story of the Westphalian aftermath would acquire the status of the myth, which should not be challenged or modified among the fields of international law and international relations. Is it true about above mentioned adoration of the Westphalian myth? What if real things carved in the Treaty of Westphalia would not be identical to the common understanding of the Westphalian myth? If this could be, what would be the milestone
event for the creation of international system operated by sovereign states? This could require us to make the painstaking effort to explore the deepest abyss of historical records touching on the notion of state sovereignty and international system. Recently, the painstaking effort has been made in the support of revisionist approach to the
Treaty of Westphalia generally backed up by historians and some of international relations scholars. Their revelation of crude nature of the Treaty of Westphalia could be powerful weapons for destroying the ghost of the Westphalian myth. Despite historical truth about the Treaty of Westphalia which could not be compatible with the Westphalian myth, international law and international relations scholars would still take a stubborn position to the real images of the Treaty of Westphalia. Reasons for this would be found at the various sources. However, the main reason for that
could be found at the unstinting effort of international law and international relations scholar: No matter what, the Treaty of Westphalia could be remembered as the very origin of sovereign states and international system. This effort undoubtedly makes a huge contribution to keep the Westphalia myth be survived. The challenges to the Westphalian myth should not be understood as the total negation of the Westphalian Treaty’s historical values. Without doubt, the Treaty of Westphalia did make a substantial and material contribution to the creation of international system composed of sovereign states. However, acknowledging the value of the Westphalian Treaty is one thing, the search for the real contents of the Westphalian Treaty is another thing. With the help of authentic interpretation of the Treaty of Westphalia, the future of international law addressing with the activities of sovereign states could be prospected in the relevant and desirable way. What is definitely needed is not the adoration of the Treaty of Westphalia as the turning point of international relations history. What is definitely needed is the dramatic change turning attitudes of international law and international relations scholars toward the Treaty of the Westphalia.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서 론
• Ⅱ. 30년전쟁 약사(略史)
• 1. 중세 유럽의 정치 구조: 수직적 및 수평적 갈등 관계
• 2. 교황과 황제 권한의 점진적 약화 및 개별 국가의 정치적 중요성 부상
• 3. 종교적-정치적 갈등의 심화 및 30년전쟁의 발발
• Ⅲ. 웨스트팔리아조약의 주요 내용
• 1. 종교적 쟁점
• 2. 영토적 쟁점
• 3. 조약체결권한 관련 쟁점
• Ⅳ. 웨스트팔리아조약의 전통적 견해에 대한 비판적 분석
• 1. 웨스트팔리아조약의 함의에대한 전통적 견해
• 2. 웨스트팔리아조약의 전통적 견해에 대한 비판적 도전
• 3. 역사적 사실로서 웨스트팔리아조약 대 창조된 역사로서 웨스트팔리아 신화
• 4. 웨스트팔리아 신화의 함의에 대한 비판적 검토
• Ⅴ. 결 론

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이근관, "주권평등 원칙의 현대적 의의에 대한 비판적 고찰" 21-50, 2007

2 장명학, "제국(empire)과 영방(territorial state)의 긴장 속의 신성로마제국 정부" 한독사회과학회 21 (21): 31-54, 2011

3 전재성, "유럽의 국제정치적 근대 출현에 관한 이론적 연구: 중첩, 복합의 거시이행" 한국국제정치학회 49 (49): 7-31, 2009

4 이혜정, "웨스트팔리아와 국제관계의 근대성: 러기(Ruggie)의 비판적 이해" 한국국제정치학회 42 (42): 27-44, 2002

5 소병천, "국제법상 주권담론에 대한 소고" 대한국제법학회 58 (58): 133-162, 2013

6 O. Yasuaki, "When was the Law of International Society Born?－An Inquiry of the History of International Law from an Intercivilizational Perspective" 2 (2): 54-55, 2000

7 R. Anand, "Third World Attitudes Towards International Law: An Introduction" Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 11-, 1987

8 S. Beaulac, "The Westphalian Model in Defining International Law: Challenging the Myth" 9 (9): 2-3, 2004

9 P. Stirk, "The Westphalian Model and Sovereign Equality" 38 (38): 2012

10 S. Beaulac, "The Westphalian Legal Orthodoxy－Myth or Reality?" 2 (2): 152-162, 2000

11 W. Werner, "The Unnamed Third: Roberta Kevelson’s Legal Semiotics and the Development of International Law" 12 (12): 319-, 1999

12 E. Engle, "The Transformation of the International Legal System: The Post-Westphalian Legal Order" 23 (23): 2004

13 A. Linklater, "The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalia Era" Univ. of South California Press 1999

14 R. Bonney, "The Thirty Years’War 1618-1648" Osprey Publishing 2002

15 G. Gong, "The Standard of‘Civilization’in International Society" Clarendon Press 1984

16 S. Beaulac, "The Power of Language in the Making of International Law" Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 33-40, 2004

17 D. Croxton, "The Peace of Westphalia of 1648 and the Origins of Sovereignty" 21 (21): 1999

18 L. Gross, "The Peace of Westphalia 1648-1948" 42 (42): 28-29, 1948

19 C. Schmitt, "The Nomos of the Earth-In the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum" Telos Press 2003

20 B. Teschke, "The Myth of 1648. Class, Geopolitics, and the Making of Modern International Relations" Verso 2009

21 B. Fassbender, "The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. X(Treaties, Provisional Application to Zones of Peace)" Oxford Univ. Press 865-, 2012

22 S. Besson, "The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. IX (Sanctions to Treaties of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation)" Oxford Univ.Press 374-378, 2012

23 C. Reus-Smit, "The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations" Oxford Univ. Press 282-, 2011

24 F. Redlich, "The German Military Enterpriser and His Work Force: A Study in European Economic and Social History" Wiesbaden 106-, 1964

25 T. Franck, "The Empowered Self-Law and Society in the Age of Individualism" Oxford Univ. Press 5-, 1999

26 G. Evans, "The Dictionary of World Politics: A Reference Guideto Concepts, Ideas, and Institutions" Simon & Schuster 42-, 1990

27 B. Bowden, "The Colonial Origins of International Law: European Expansion and the Classical Standard of Civilization" 7 (7): 13-20, 2005

28 K. Pennington, "The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought-c. 350-.1450" Cambridge Univ. Press 432-433, 1988

29 B. de Carvalho, "The Big Bangs of IR: The Myths That Your Teachers Still Tell You about1648 and 1919" 39 (39): 2011

30 D. Fidler, "The Asian Century: Implications for International Law" 9 (9): 21-, 2005

31 H. Bull, "The Anarchical Society: A Study of Orderin World Politics" Macmillan 32-, 1977

32 S. Krasner, "Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy" Princeton Univ. Press 11-25, 1999

33 Osiander, "Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth" 55 (55): 252-, 2001

34 F. Hinsley, "Sovereignty" Cambridge Univ. Press 61-62, 1986

35 D. Philpott, "Revolution in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations" Princeton Univ. Press 79-, 2001

36 D. Fidler, "Revolt Against or From With in the West TWAIL, the Developing World, and the Future Direction of International Law" 15 (15): 2003

37 J. Gagliardo, "Reich and Nation … The Holy Roman Empire as Ideaand Reality; 1763-1806" Univ. Indiana Press 187-, 1980

38 D. Boucher, "Political Theories of International Relations" Oxford Univ. Press 29-, 1998

39 K. Holsti, "Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order 1638-1989" Cambridge Univ. Press 29-, 1991

40 R. Lesaffer, "Peace Treaties and International Law in European History-From the Late Middle Agesto World War One" Cambridge Univ. Press 9-, 2004

41 J. Strayer, "On the Medieval Origins of the Modern State" Princeton Univ. Press 26-36, 1970

42 A. Shibasaki, "Myths in a Discipline: IR and“the Peace of Westphalia" 14 (14): 2014

43 P. Allott, "Modern Law of Self-Determination" Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 184-185, 1993

44 G. Braun, "Lestraductions françaises des traités de Westphalie de 1648 à la fin de l’Ancien Régime"

45 R. Falk, "Law in an Emerging Global Village: A Post-Westphalian Perspective" Transnational Publishers 4-, 1998

46 K. Shimko, "International Relations: Perspective, Controversies & Readings" Wadsworth Publishing 2-, 2013

47 A. Cassese, "International Law" Oxford Univ. Press 19-21, 2001

48 A. Anghie, "Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law" Cambridge Univ. Press 32-40, 2005

49 E. Ringmar, "Identity, Interest and Action: A Cultural Explanation of Sweden’s Intervention in the Thirty Years War" Cambridge Univ.Press 1996

50 S. Krasner, "Ideas and Foreign Policy. Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change" Cornell Univ. Press 1993

51 J. Moser, "Grundri ß der heutigen Staats-Verfassung des teutschen Reichs" Cotta 492-493, 1745

52 J. Dryzek, "Global Civil Society: The Progress of Post-Westphalian Politics" 15 (15): 2012

53 R. Joyce, "Events: The Force of International Law" Routledge 63-67, 2011

54 H. Steinberger, "Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. 10, States-Responsibility of States-International Law and Municipal Law" North-Holland Publishing Company 398-, 1987

55 G. Clark, "Early Modern Europe from about 1450 to about 1720" Oxford Univ. Press 28-, 1957

56 S. Krasner, "Compromising Westphalia" 20 (20): 1995

57 M. Lyons, "Beyond Westphalia?: National Sovereignty and International Intervention" Johns Hopkins Univ.Press 1995

58 C. Armstrong, "Beyond Westphalia: The Emergent Globalization Paradigm" BiblioScholar 2012

59 A. Wendt, "Anarchy is what StatesMake of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics" 46 (46): 1992

60 P. Malanczuk, "Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law" Routledge 9-, 1997

61 G. Ikenberry, "After Victory. Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars" Princeton Univ. Press 37-, 2001

62 A. Nussbaum, "A Concise History of the Law of Nations" The Macmillan Company 115-117, 1961

63 C.V. 웨지우드, "30년 전쟁(The Thirty Years War 1618-1648)" 휴머니스트 2011