RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      노동금지명령, 그 관행과 의미  :  1920년대 뉴욕주 노동법과 노사관계 Labor Law and Labor Relations in the 1920s New York State = The Labor Injunction, Its Meaning and Practice

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19642723

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      At the center of the reciprocal relationship between the labor policy and the labor movement in the 1920s New York st ate lies the labor injunction. Stressing the essential role of the judiciary in constructing labor-capital relations, this article intends to show that the "lean years" of the 1920s was mainly due to the oppressive labor policy exemplified in the labor injunction.
      The injunction prohibited workers from participating in a strike or a boycott if it could destroy an employer s property, which more often than not was interpreted broadly and arbitrarily. Throughout the 1920s, the labor injunction represented the most formidable weapon against organized labor and it achieved its widest use. Especially in New York State, courts issued more labor injunctions than in any other jurisdiction in any period. Employers hostile to organized labor found it an effective way to quash union-organizing campaigns. The labor injunction henceforth significantly imperiled union security.
      Until the national emergency of the Great Depression and the legal revolution waged by Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Dealers, the judiciary had both the power and the will to repress the rights of labor to organize, join the union and strike. But industrial unionists like Sidney Hillman were keen to keep alive the possibility of invoking law and public power on labors behalf while reformminded lawyers like Felix Frankfurter challenged the legal conservatives and attempted to transform the jurisprudence from the Victorian one to the pluralist one. While their effort s failed in the 1920s, both Hillman and Frankfurter finally became core members of the New Dealers during the next decade, and made contribution to the New Deal labor policy to be more egalitarian and livable for laborers. In the 1920s, as has been exemplified in the Michaels vs. Hillman, the seeds for the industrial democracy was burgeoning on the plot of sterile ground, waiting for the auspicious time to blossom, while the sustenance of the fruits still remained to be testified for decades to come.
      번역하기

      At the center of the reciprocal relationship between the labor policy and the labor movement in the 1920s New York st ate lies the labor injunction. Stressing the essential role of the judiciary in constructing labor-capital relations, this article in...

      At the center of the reciprocal relationship between the labor policy and the labor movement in the 1920s New York st ate lies the labor injunction. Stressing the essential role of the judiciary in constructing labor-capital relations, this article intends to show that the "lean years" of the 1920s was mainly due to the oppressive labor policy exemplified in the labor injunction.
      The injunction prohibited workers from participating in a strike or a boycott if it could destroy an employer s property, which more often than not was interpreted broadly and arbitrarily. Throughout the 1920s, the labor injunction represented the most formidable weapon against organized labor and it achieved its widest use. Especially in New York State, courts issued more labor injunctions than in any other jurisdiction in any period. Employers hostile to organized labor found it an effective way to quash union-organizing campaigns. The labor injunction henceforth significantly imperiled union security.
      Until the national emergency of the Great Depression and the legal revolution waged by Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Dealers, the judiciary had both the power and the will to repress the rights of labor to organize, join the union and strike. But industrial unionists like Sidney Hillman were keen to keep alive the possibility of invoking law and public power on labors behalf while reformminded lawyers like Felix Frankfurter challenged the legal conservatives and attempted to transform the jurisprudence from the Victorian one to the pluralist one. While their effort s failed in the 1920s, both Hillman and Frankfurter finally became core members of the New Dealers during the next decade, and made contribution to the New Deal labor policy to be more egalitarian and livable for laborers. In the 1920s, as has been exemplified in the Michaels vs. Hillman, the seeds for the industrial democracy was burgeoning on the plot of sterile ground, waiting for the auspicious time to blossom, while the sustenance of the fruits still remained to be testified for decades to come.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 머리말 : 풍요의 시대, 노동의 흉작기
      • Ⅱ. 노동금지 명령에 의한 지배
      • Ⅲ. 맺음말 : 구원자의 발소리가 들려온다?
      • Ⅰ. 머리말 : 풍요의 시대, 노동의 흉작기
      • Ⅱ. 노동금지 명령에 의한 지배
      • Ⅲ. 맺음말 : 구원자의 발소리가 들려온다?
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-08 학술지등록 한글명 : 서양사론
      외국어명 : The Western History Review
      KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.31 0.31 0.23
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.26 0.26 0.494 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼