RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Paulo Freire 교육론의 특수교육적 접근 = Paulo Freire's Education Theory Approached to Discourses of Special Education

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10203036

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        경산 : 대구대학교 특수교육대학원, 2005

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(석사) -- 대구대학교 특수교육대학원 , 특수교육학과 , 2005. 2

      • 발행연도

        2005

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 발행국(도시)

        경상북도

      • 형태사항

        1책 ; 26cm.

      • 소장기관
        • 대구대학교 학술정보원 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study is to investigate Paulo Freire's philosophical background, social-cultural background, view of the world and human beings in order to examine his education philosophy comprehensively. In addition, this study discussed his education philosophy from the viewpoint of special education to find its implications for special education in Korea.
      This study is a literature review, analyzing as primary materials Paulo Freire's major books 'Pedagogy of the Oppressed(1970,1995)', 'Pedagogy of Hope(1992,2002),' 'Teachers As Cultural Workers(1998,2000)' and 'Pedagogy of the Heart(2000,2003).' The main conclusions of this study are as follows.
      First, special education must be the starting point of humanization education, going beyond the education of the children with disabilities.
      Second, special education should be expanded to be 'consciousness education' in its true sense so that the children with disabilities may be able to protect their rights and interests by themselves.
      Third, classrooms in special school should be places of truthful conversations beyond functional and practical methodologies.
      Fourth, teachers in charge of special education should not remain merely as caregivers. They must be born again as progressive teachers who strengthen students with disabilities to keep throwing questions of 'why,' to live as dignified members of the society.
      Lastly, this study confirmed that what people dream in the world are to live a decent life and to love one another more readily. In the reality of special education, nevertheless, people with disabilities cannot help but struggling for their rights and interests. For the struggles to be more scientific and systematic, special education as well as educators and parents involved in special education must change. Such changes will prompt the coming of an entirely humanized society. In this sense, Freire's education philosophy gives a great lesson to special education and the lesson may need our modest courage.
      번역하기

      This study is to investigate Paulo Freire's philosophical background, social-cultural background, view of the world and human beings in order to examine his education philosophy comprehensively. In addition, this study discussed his education philosop...

      This study is to investigate Paulo Freire's philosophical background, social-cultural background, view of the world and human beings in order to examine his education philosophy comprehensively. In addition, this study discussed his education philosophy from the viewpoint of special education to find its implications for special education in Korea.
      This study is a literature review, analyzing as primary materials Paulo Freire's major books 'Pedagogy of the Oppressed(1970,1995)', 'Pedagogy of Hope(1992,2002),' 'Teachers As Cultural Workers(1998,2000)' and 'Pedagogy of the Heart(2000,2003).' The main conclusions of this study are as follows.
      First, special education must be the starting point of humanization education, going beyond the education of the children with disabilities.
      Second, special education should be expanded to be 'consciousness education' in its true sense so that the children with disabilities may be able to protect their rights and interests by themselves.
      Third, classrooms in special school should be places of truthful conversations beyond functional and practical methodologies.
      Fourth, teachers in charge of special education should not remain merely as caregivers. They must be born again as progressive teachers who strengthen students with disabilities to keep throwing questions of 'why,' to live as dignified members of the society.
      Lastly, this study confirmed that what people dream in the world are to live a decent life and to love one another more readily. In the reality of special education, nevertheless, people with disabilities cannot help but struggling for their rights and interests. For the struggles to be more scientific and systematic, special education as well as educators and parents involved in special education must change. Such changes will prompt the coming of an entirely humanized society. In this sense, Freire's education philosophy gives a great lesson to special education and the lesson may need our modest courage.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 문제 제기 = 1
      • 2. 연구 목적과 문제 = 4
      • 3. 연구 방법 = 5
      • 목차
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 문제 제기 = 1
      • 2. 연구 목적과 문제 = 4
      • 3. 연구 방법 = 5
      • 4. 연구의 제한점 = 5
      • Ⅱ. Paulo Freire 의 교육론 = 6
      • 1. Paulo Freire의 사상적 배경 = 6
      • 1) 사회·문화적 배경 = 6
      • 2) Freire의 세계관과 인간관 = 10
      • 2. Freire 교육의 목적과 방법론 = 13
      • 1) 인간화 교육 = 13
      • 2) 의식화 교육 = 15
      • 3) 문제제기식 교육 = 18
      • 4) 대화론 = 21
      • 3. Freire의 교사론 = 26
      • Ⅲ. Freire 교육론이 특수교육에 주는 시사점 = 32
      • 1. Freire의 인간화 교육과 특수교육 = 32
      • 2. Freire의 의식화 교육과 특수교육 = 34
      • 3. Freire의 대화론과 특수교육 = 38
      • 4. Freire의 교사론과 특수교육 = 41
      • Ⅳ. 요약과 결론 = 44
      • 1. 요약 = 44
      • 2. 결론 = 48
      • 참고문헌 = 54
      • ABSTRACT = 56
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼