RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      노동생산성이 총노동시간과 임금에 미치는 영향: 제조업과 서비스업의 비교 = Effects of Labor Productivity Shocks on Total Hours Worked and Wage: Manufacturing vs. Service Industries

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103826837

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      There are various studies on the relationship between labor productivity, employment, and wage. First, the relationship between labor productivity and employment can be explained by the relative size of substitution effect and compensation effect. In other words, when the improvement in the labor productivity comes from the technological innovation, it will substitute labor so that employment falls. On the other hand, improvement in the labor productivity causes the prices of goods and services to fall and increases demand for those goods and services. It will therefore increase demand for labor in those industries. Second, the real business cycle theory argues that productivity shock will have a positive effect on employment. However, Gali(1999) argues that productivity shock lowers the marginal production cost while, because of the price rigidity, demand for goods does not change. As a result, firms reduce the number of worker employed from a rise in the labor productivity. Finally, Chang et al.(2009) note that, even when there is a price rigidity, technology shock may increase employment if it is less costly to hold inventories. In sum, whether a rise in labor productivity on employment is positive or not is subject to empirical investigation.
      The paper utilizes panel vector autoregressive (VAR) model to compare the effects of labor productivity shocks on employment, proxied by the total hour worked, and wages between manufacture industries and service industries. The results show that labor productivity shocks in the manufacturing sectors have positive effects on employment while those in the service sectors have negative effects on employment. Labor productivity shocks in both in manufacturing and service industries cause wages to rise.
      However, the wage rise is higher in the manufacturing industries than services industries in response to labor productivity shocks.
      A rise in employment in the manufacturing sector and a fall in employment in the service sector in response to a labor productivity shock can be explained by two different theories. First, our results support that the compensation effect is greater than the substitution effect in the manufacturing sector while the compensation effect is less that the substitution effect in the service sector. Second, because holding inventories are less costly in the manufacturing sector, labor productivity shock increases employment in the manufacturing sector while it lowers employment in the service sector.
      번역하기

      There are various studies on the relationship between labor productivity, employment, and wage. First, the relationship between labor productivity and employment can be explained by the relative size of substitution effect and compensation effect. In ...

      There are various studies on the relationship between labor productivity, employment, and wage. First, the relationship between labor productivity and employment can be explained by the relative size of substitution effect and compensation effect. In other words, when the improvement in the labor productivity comes from the technological innovation, it will substitute labor so that employment falls. On the other hand, improvement in the labor productivity causes the prices of goods and services to fall and increases demand for those goods and services. It will therefore increase demand for labor in those industries. Second, the real business cycle theory argues that productivity shock will have a positive effect on employment. However, Gali(1999) argues that productivity shock lowers the marginal production cost while, because of the price rigidity, demand for goods does not change. As a result, firms reduce the number of worker employed from a rise in the labor productivity. Finally, Chang et al.(2009) note that, even when there is a price rigidity, technology shock may increase employment if it is less costly to hold inventories. In sum, whether a rise in labor productivity on employment is positive or not is subject to empirical investigation.
      The paper utilizes panel vector autoregressive (VAR) model to compare the effects of labor productivity shocks on employment, proxied by the total hour worked, and wages between manufacture industries and service industries. The results show that labor productivity shocks in the manufacturing sectors have positive effects on employment while those in the service sectors have negative effects on employment. Labor productivity shocks in both in manufacturing and service industries cause wages to rise.
      However, the wage rise is higher in the manufacturing industries than services industries in response to labor productivity shocks.
      A rise in employment in the manufacturing sector and a fall in employment in the service sector in response to a labor productivity shock can be explained by two different theories. First, our results support that the compensation effect is greater than the substitution effect in the manufacturing sector while the compensation effect is less that the substitution effect in the service sector. Second, because holding inventories are less costly in the manufacturing sector, labor productivity shock increases employment in the manufacturing sector while it lowers employment in the service sector.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 반가운, "한국경제의 노동생산성과 성장 및 고용- OECD 국가와의 국제비교 -" 한국생산성학회 25 (25): 51-73, 2011

      2 김상호, "총요소생산성 향상이 노동시간에 미치는 영향" 한국경제학회 54 (54): 5-32, 2006

      3 김배근, "제조업과 서비스업의 기술진보 격차가 고용에 미치는 영향" 한국은행 금융경제 연구원 1-67, 2009

      4 김대모, "적정임금 결정방법으로서의 생산성임금제의 논리적 근거" 한국고용노사관계학회 15 (15): 1-21, 2005

      5 김재원, "임금문제의 개선방향- 생산성에 상응하는 임금지급을 중심으로 -" 한국생산성학회 20 (20): 183-210, 2006

      6 박기성, "임금과 생산성" 한국노동경제학회 27 (27): 165-179, 2004

      7 이시욱, "서비스업 고용과 생산성 간 인과성 분석" 사회과학연구원 38 (38): 153-176, 2012

      8 이근희, "노동생산성의 고용효과에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2002

      9 김진웅, "노동생산성 혁신의 산업 간 전이효과 -산업구조 변화측면에서" 한국경제연구학회 28 (28): 5-36, 2010

      10 강규호, "기술혁신과 고용창출" 한국은행 12 (12): 53-74, 2006

      1 반가운, "한국경제의 노동생산성과 성장 및 고용- OECD 국가와의 국제비교 -" 한국생산성학회 25 (25): 51-73, 2011

      2 김상호, "총요소생산성 향상이 노동시간에 미치는 영향" 한국경제학회 54 (54): 5-32, 2006

      3 김배근, "제조업과 서비스업의 기술진보 격차가 고용에 미치는 영향" 한국은행 금융경제 연구원 1-67, 2009

      4 김대모, "적정임금 결정방법으로서의 생산성임금제의 논리적 근거" 한국고용노사관계학회 15 (15): 1-21, 2005

      5 김재원, "임금문제의 개선방향- 생산성에 상응하는 임금지급을 중심으로 -" 한국생산성학회 20 (20): 183-210, 2006

      6 박기성, "임금과 생산성" 한국노동경제학회 27 (27): 165-179, 2004

      7 이시욱, "서비스업 고용과 생산성 간 인과성 분석" 사회과학연구원 38 (38): 153-176, 2012

      8 이근희, "노동생산성의 고용효과에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2002

      9 김진웅, "노동생산성 혁신의 산업 간 전이효과 -산업구조 변화측면에서" 한국경제연구학회 28 (28): 5-36, 2010

      10 강규호, "기술혁신과 고용창출" 한국은행 12 (12): 53-74, 2006

      11 송일호, "근로시간 단축이 고용, 생산성 및 단위노동비용에 미치는 효과에 대한 실증분석" 한국생산성학회 18 (18): 65-80, 2004

      12 박추환, "고용과 임금이 지역별 제조업 생산성에 미치는 영향 분석" 한국지역사회학회 17 (17): 1-18, 2009

      13 정진호, "고용과 생산성 간의 관계" 99 : 5-20, 2013

      14 한진수, "거시노동변수의 관계 : 한국의 생산성, 실업률, 임금" 46 (46): 123-141, 1998

      15 Dedola, L., "What does a technology shock do? A VAR analysis with model-based sign restrictions" 54 (54): 512-549, 2004

      16 Canova, F., "The Labor Market Effects of Technology Shocks" Universitat Pompeu Fabra 2007

      17 허현승, "Technology, Employment, and Cleansing Effects: An Empirical Study of the G-7" 한국경제연구학회 16 (16): 1-24, 2015

      18 Gali, J., "Technology, Employment and the Business Cycle : Do Technology Shocks Explain Aggregate Fluctuations?" 89 (89): 249-271, 1999

      19 Chang, Y., "On the employment effects of productivity shocks : The role of inventories, demand elasticity, and sticky prices" 56 (56): 328-343, 2009

      20 Francis, N., "Is the Technology-driven Real Business Cycle Hypothesis Dead? Shocks and Aggregate Fluctuations Revisited" 52 (52): 1379-1399, 2005

      21 Love, I, "Financial Development and Dynamic Investment Behavior: Evidence from panel VAR" 46 (46): 190-210, 2006

      22 Uhlig, H, "Do Technology Shocks Lead to a Fall in Total Hours Worked?" 2 (2): 361-371, 2004

      23 Tregenna, F., "Characterising Deindustrialization : An Analysis of Changes in Manufacturing Employment and Output Internationally" 33 (33): 433-466, 2009

      24 Basu, S., "Are Technology Improvements Contractionary?" 96 (96): 1418-1448, 2006

      25 Arellano, M., "Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error Component Models" 68 (68): 29-51, 1995

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-06-07 학술지명변경 한글명 : 생산성논집 -> 생산성연구: 국제융합학술지
      외국어명 : Productivity Review -> Productivity Research: An International Interdisciplinary Journal
      KCI등재
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2013-12-17 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Productivity Review KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-30 학술지명변경 한글명 : 生産性論集 -> 생산성논집 KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.78 0.78 0.8
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.77 0.76 1.06 0.16
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼