정부규제의 대안과 대체질서

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Critics of government regulation sponsor a wide variety of alternatives to command and control regulation. Others design alternative regimes to government regulation while deregulation options are under consideration. Further, Government agencies analyse alternatives to regulatory options in the process of regulatory impact analysis.
However, alternative measures to regulation should be considered more seriously and meaningfully in order to enhance regulatory reform in the Republic of Korea. Besides, they should be developed to implementable and practical versions in Korean legislative and administrative circumstances.
Firstly, private law actions should be considered as alternatives to regulation under theories of tort liability, strict liability, product liability, nuisance and punitive damage.
Economic incentives belong to other categories of alternatives such as taxes, subsidies, tradeable property rights, effluent charges and public ownership.
Further, various practices of self-regulation such as voluntary standards programs and peer review systems have to be selected and refined instead of command and control regulations.
Compensatory remedies after the occurrence of certain risk could be another category of alternative.
Finally, government influence short of regulation has to be used for alternatives to regulation. This influence can occur in the form of procurement contracts, publicity and education, and various forms of guidance and coercion.
We have to use these alternatives for successful regulatory reform in the Republic of Korea. For this purpose, I propose the following conditions to satisfy in the first place.
Firstly, the Korean Government should regenerate current Regulatory Impact Analysis processes in order to justify adopting alternatives to regulation adequately.
Secondly, reformers should have broader jurisdiction for adopting alternatives to regulation because alternatives often exceed jurisdiction of one or two administrative agencies. In fact, powerful mechanisms for policy coordination should be established for this purpose. An organization that has presidential authority or administrative power of the Prime Minister could be established.
Thirdly, as these alternatives lack completeness compared to command and control regulations, we need to supplement alternative measures with other alternatives or relatively weak tools of command and control regulations.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 국문초록
• Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
• Ⅱ. 규제매트릭스(Matrix)와 규제적 질서의 유형론(Typology)
• Ⅲ. 사법(私法)질서와 절차수정에 의한 대안
• Ⅳ. 시장기능과 경제적 유인(Economic Incentive)에 기반한 대안
• Ⅴ. 자율규제를 통한 대안
• Ⅵ. 보험 기타 보상계획을 통한 대안
• Ⅶ. 정부의 영향력에 의한 대안
• Ⅷ. 정부규제의 대안의 채택과 이행
• 참고문헌
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 신석훈, "하도급법상의 징벌적 손해배상제도의 위헌성 검토"

2 김정해, "주요 선진국의 규제개혁 비교연구" 한국행정연구원 2006

3 최병선, "정부규제론: 규제와 규제완화의 정치경제" 법문사 2006

4 이민창, "자율규제의 성공요인과 한계 : 신문판매공정규약사례를 중심으로" 14 (14): 2003

5 김영수, "자율규제와 규제권한 확대간의 갈등 및 해결방안에 관한 연구- 신문고시제도 사례를 중심으로" 한국지방정부학회 8 (8): 355-379, 2005

6 朴 敏, "민사재판의 공공정책결정기능에 관한 비교법적 연구" 한국공법학회 34 (34): 235-256, 2005

7 가정준, "미국 불법행위법 발전의 이론적 고찰" 2 (2): 2005

8 최유성, "대안적 규제전략에 관한 연구" 한국행정연구원 2004

9 김유환, "규제영향분석제도의 재구성" 법학연구소 15 (15): 379-408, 2010

10 국무총리실, "규제영향분석서 작성지침"

11 이주선, "규제개혁추진체계 개선방안" 한국경제연구원 2007

12 김종석, "규제개혁종합연구" 한국경제연구원 2007

13 조창현, "규제개혁의 집행 순응 실태와 사후관리 효율화 방안" 산업연구원 2008

14 이원우, "규제개혁과 규제완화: 올바른 규제정책 실현을 위한 법정책의 모색" 한국법학원 (106) : 355-389, 2008

15 조성한, "규제개혁 집행의 개선방안 연구" 한국경제연구원 2008

16 전재경, "규제 패러다임의 재편 : 정책과 법제의 격차해소를 통한 규제개혁 실행방안연구(I)" 한국법제연구원 2009

17 이현수, "공법상 허가와 민법상 책임 - 독일의 상린관계법상의 논의를 중심으로" 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會) 11 : 273-290, 2004

18 Parker, Christine, "The Open Corporation: Effective Self-regulation and Democracy" Cambridge University Press 2002

19 Singclair, Darren, "Self-Regulation Versus Command and Control? Beyond False Dichotomies" 19 : 1997

20 Coglianese, Cary, "Regulation and Regulatory Processes"

21 Rietema, Paul B, "Reconceptualizing Split-Recovery Statutes: Philip Morris USA v. Williams, 127 S. Ct. 1057" 31 : 2008

22 Coglianese, Cary, "Management-Based Regulation: Implications for Public Policy"

23 Gunningham, Neil, "Industry Self-Regulation: An Institutional Perspective" 19 : 1997

24 Peter Taylor-Gooby, "Hutter, Bridget, Risk, Regulation, and Management, In Risk in Social Science" Oxford University Press 2006

25 Markel, Dan, "How Should Punitive Damages Work" 157 : 2009

26 Baram, Michael S, "Alternatives to Regulation - Managing Risks to Health, Safety and the Environment" Lexington Books 1982

27 Gellhorn, Ernest, "Adverse Publicity by Administrative Agencies" 86 : 1973

28 Aman Jr., "Administrative Law in a Global Era: Progress, Deregulatory Change and the Rise of the Administrative Presidency" 73 : 1988

29 Breyer, "Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy: Problems, Text, and Cases" Aspen Publishers 2006

30 Krauss, Michael I, ""Retributive Damages" and the Death of Private Ordering" 158 : 2010