RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies among a Korean College Students

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99694992

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper explores Korean EFL college students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies in reference to factors that may facilitate strategy use, such as L2 proficiency, L1 reading experience and academic L2 reading experience. A survey questio...

      This paper explores Korean EFL college students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies in reference to factors that may facilitate strategy use, such as L2 proficiency, L1 reading experience and academic L2 reading experience. A survey questionnaire adapted from the Survey of Reading Strategies (Mokhtari & Sheorey, 2002) with three subscales (i .e. global reading, problem solving, and support reading strategies) was administered to 96 students, 50 upper-class English majors and 46 freshmen. The data analysis revealed the following: 1) The students' overall strategy use was at the upper moderate frequency level, concurring with the results of previous studies in L2 reading (Kweon, 2009; Malcolm, 2009; Zhang & Wu, 2009). 2) Of the three variables, the extent of L1 reading experience had main effects on the use of the overall strategies, the global reading and the support reading strategies, with L2 proficiency exerting a limited effect. 3) L1 translation was a strategy favored by the students with low L2 proficiency but extensive L1 reading experience. The reliance on L1 as the medium of cognitive processes was obvious among the upper-class students, possibly due to their positive experience of utilizing L1 as the language of thought in dealing with academic texts.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION
      • Ⅱ. PREVIOUS RESEARCH
      • Ⅲ. METHODS
      • Ⅳ. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
      • Ⅴ. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
      • Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION
      • Ⅱ. PREVIOUS RESEARCH
      • Ⅲ. METHODS
      • Ⅳ. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
      • Ⅴ. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
      • REFERENCES
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼