부실등기해소를 위한 방법론에 관한 비교법적 고찰 - 일본 부동산등기법으로부터의 示唆 = Comparative study on the method to solve improper registration - Consideration from Japanese Real Estate Registration Regulations -

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

  There are a few exaggerated aspects in the number of improper registrations which have been well known to everyone or expressed on documents. In fact, the number of improper registrations is far lower than that of improper real estate registrations. However, the notary of registration certificate involves ineffective and unreliable problems, which will cause a danger to produce malicious improper registrations if the notary is linked with public trust. Therefore, I believe that the gradual type, which strives for the authenticity of registration by confirming the person himself/herself and the origin of the registration shown as Japanese case. First of all, the preventive system to prevent improper registrations includes judicial scrivener, land and house investigator, unification of the ledger and registration, address confirmation system, analogical application under Clause 2, Article 94 of Japanese Civil Law, etc. In particular, Japanese public registration officials have the formal inspection rights, which strive for speedy registration. In order to prevent predictable improper registration, the ledger and registration has been unified, which authorizes the mark of the registration.<BR>  Recently revised Japanese Real Estate Registration Regulations accept online registration application and strengthen to confirm the person himself/herself by using electronic signature and electronic confirmation system as an alternative means of the seal impression certificate, which will ultimately contribute to the prevention of improper registration. Online registration application is expected to become common as a chain of Registration Computerization in the near future in Korea. Accordingly, the Japanese Real Estate Registration System which has been recently revised will be the model of our future system.<BR>  Originally, this subject is under systemic argument rather than law analysis, so therefore it is difficult to evaluate the objectiveness. In particular, the discussion on the Real Estate Registration System, standing between numerous people who interested, can cause a severe fight to keep so-called ‘own rice bowl (selfish ownprofit)" as we experienced in the discussion on notary system in 1980’s. Nevertheless, the reason I passively insist the point on the introduction of the notary system is to demand intrinsic discussion on whether the notary system is appropriate in practical business of Real Estate Reality Right Change in Korea before unquestioningly accepting the system. As mentioned above, although the Reality Right Change of Japanese Civil Law adopts Registration System of France Law, its Real Estate Registration Regulations have been influenced by German Law. Although Korea has adopted the German Registration System on the Real Estate Reality Right Change, there is a timely discontinuation between law action and registration. So Japanese Registration System has been expropriated to Korean registration system. Based on the assumption of this fact, the Japanese Registration System is very suggestive on Korean System. In the light of the history and operational reality of the registration system, I believe that Japanese Improper Registration Prevention System is a rather easily approachable and realistic scheme compared with other countries’ systems.<BR>  In my opinion, the introduction of Notary System and Public Trust demands to revise Article 186 of Civil Law, so therefore continuous discussions and inquisitive studies shall be carried out first. As the Notary System should be gradually introduced, a convenient means is appropriate to confirm the person himself/herself and the authenticity of the registration. As online registration becomes settled down, the importance of the functions mentioned above will gradually increase.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 序說
  Ⅱ. 우리나라 부동산등기제도의 체계
  Ⅲ. 일본의 부실등기 해소제도의 적용 모색
  Ⅳ. 結語
  【Abstract】
  

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 丁玉泰, "不動産登記特別措置法에 關한 一考察"

2 松岡久和, "不動産登記法の改正"

3 鎌田 薰, "不動産登記制度の歷史と展望" 法學セミナ

4 田中康求, "不動産登記制度の變遷と今後課題" テイハン 1988

5 寺田逸郞, "不動産登記-その制度と運用" 新不動産登記講座 1 1997

6 洪性載, "不動産物權變動論-소유권양도를 중심으로" 법문사 190-193, 1992

7 金正洙, "현행 不動産登記制度의 문제점과 개선방향" 법원행정처 24-25, 1988

8 김정수, "현행 부동산등기제도의 문제점과 개선방향"

9 김정수, "현행 부동산등기제도의 문제점과 개선방향"

10 洪性載, "전게서" 190-193,

11 고상룡, "전게논문"

12 윤진수, "전게논문"

13 정옥태, "전게 토론문"

14 박광동, "일본의 부동산등기법의 전면 개정"

15 박광동, "일본의 등기원인증명정보에 대한 현황과 그 고찰"

16 고상룡, "일본부동산등기법의 대개혁에 관한 소고"

17 최명구, "일본 신부동산등기법의 주요내용"

18 김상용, "인감증명제도의 인감등록제도로의 전환에 따른 법적 문제점"

19 홍성재, "부실등기신뢰자보호의 법리구성에 관한 연구" 1 (1): 58-,

20 법원행정처, "부실등기사례집"

21 김용준, "부실등기발생원인의 실증적 고찰과 그 방지대책에 관한 소고" 연세대학교법학연구소 4 : 145-158,

22 정옥태, "부동산등기의 공신력에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 1987

23 곽윤직, "부동산등기법" 박영사 43-, 1992

24 곽윤직, "부동산등기법"

25 양창수, "민법(재산편) 개정 자료집"

26 법무부, "민법(재산편) 개정 자료집"

27 고상룡, "물권행위의 독자성과 무인성론의 재검토소고"

28 金滉植, "물권법의 개정 방향" 경문사 1-286, 1985

29 김상용, "물권법"

30 곽윤직, "물권법"

31 黃迪仁, "등기의무주의의 필요성" 박영사 1985

32 徐永培, "관인계약서사용의 실효성"

33 이상영, "공증제도의 과제 - 전자공증제도의 도입을 중심으로" 8 (8): 620-,

34 현승종, "게르만법"

35 남효순, "간접증명방식의 현행 印鑑證明法에서의 印鑑證明書의 本人推定力 : 印鑑證明의 본질과 印鑑證明書의 기능에 대한 분석에 기초하여"

36 法務省, "電子情報處理組織を使用する方法による申請の導入等に伴う不動産登記法の改正に關する擔当者骨子案の補足說明"

37 靑木宏益, "間接證明による印鑑登錄證明の機能と印鑑登錄証の性質についての一考察"

38 정권섭, "臺帳과 登記簿의 一元化[民事法改正意見書]"

39 內田 貴, "總則ㆍ物權總論"

40 "登記請求手續 司法省令甲第5号"

41 權龍雨, "登記原因證書의 公證-부실등기방지를 위한 입법방안" (18) : 1-253,

42 정옥태, "登記原因證書의 公證(김증한 교수의 발표)에 대한 토론요지" 박영사 1982

43 金禹鉉, "登記原因證書의 公證(김증한 교수의 발표)에 대한 토론요지" 박영사 1982

44 郭潤直, "登記原因證書의 公證" (제2․3) : 1-21,

45 金容漢, "登記原因證書의 公證" 서울대출판부 1-40, 1978

46 金曾漢, "登記原因證書의 公證" 박영사 1-3, 1982

47 宗 守浩, "登記制度司法書士將來像"

48 石田喜久夫, "物權變動論"

49 윤진수, "物權行爲 槪念에 대한 새로운 接近" 한국민사법학회 (28) : 3-56, 2005

50 鈴木祿彌, "物權法講義" 倉文社 1994

51 舟橋諄一, "物權法"

52 東京高裁, "昭和 58"

53 同, "日本における不動産登記制度の歷史" 24 (24): 4-13,

54 我妻榮, "新訂物權法"

55 石田喜久夫, "新版注釋民法(6)"

56 高野眞人, "改正不動産登記法"

57 高野眞人, "改正不動産登記法"

58 洪性載, "折衷的 登記主義의 課題" 7 (7): 26-28, 2000

59 多田光吉, "土地家屋調査士制度の回顧と展望"

60 江草忠敬, "土地バブル經濟と法ㆍ都市の昏迷"

61 江藤价泰, "司法書士制度の現狀と機能"

62 俣野幸太郞, "司法書士制度の回顧と展望"

63 동, "印鑑證明폐지와 그 대안"

64 동, "印鑑證明폐지와 그 대안"

65 김병두, "印鑑證明에 관한 小考"

66 김병두, "印鑑證明에 관한 小考"

67 古崎慶長, "印鑑證明國家賠償法一條" 71 (71): 6-,

68 秋山義昭, "印鑑證明事務につきいわゆる間接證明方式が採用されている場合において申請人が本人であること又は代理人に代理權があることの確認のためにする印鑑照會と擔當職員の注意義務"

69 淸水 誠, "印鑑證明の意義と機能に關する一試論" (519) : 35-,

70 白枝祥男, "印鑑登錄証明制度の合理化について - 間接證明方式による印鑑登錄証明制度の改善" (203) : 45-,

71 淸水 誠, "前揭論文"

72 寺田逸郞, "前揭論文"

73 田中康求, "前揭論文"

74 鐮 田 薰, "前揭論文"

75 橫山美夏, "信賴性の高い登記制度に向けて" (494) : 34-,

76 石田喜久夫, "上揭書"

77 鎌田薰, "フランス不動産讓渡法の史的考察(2)"

78 福島正夫, "わが國における登記制度の變遷" 帝國判例出版社 1974

79 H. J. Wieling, "Sachenrecht"

80 H. J. Wieling, "Sachenrecht"

81 A. Leist, "Privatrecht und Kapitalismus im 19" 1911

82 F. Baur, "Lehrbuch des Sachenrechts"

83 Kuntze, "Kommentar zum Grundbuchrecht"

84 好美淸光, "Jus ad remとその發展的消滅"

85 好美淸光, "Jus ad remとその發展的消滅"

86 好美淸光, "Jus ad remとその發展的消滅" 一橋大學年報

87 A. Achilles, "Beiträge zur Erläuterung des Deutchen Rechts"

88 Berner Kommentar, "Arthur Meier-Hayoz"

89 검인계약서를 작성하여야 할 범위는,초기(1988.10.1~1990.8.31)에는 매매 또는 교환의 경우에 한해서만 작성하도록 하였으나(구 부동산등기법 제40조 제2항),부동산등기특별조치법이 시행된, "9.1.이후에는 부동산소유권이전을 목적으로 하는 계약은 모두 검인계약서를 작성하게 하였다(동법 제3조 제1항)"

90 Basler Kommentar, "2"

91 "."

92 "."

93 "."

94 "."