노동법의 규범구조와 근로권과 노동3권의 관계 = The normative structure of labor law and the relation between the right to work and the labor’s three primary rights

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The article 23 and 33 of the Constitution guarantees the right to work and the labor’s three primary rights as basic rights. The Constitution stipulates rights to work and labor’s three primary rights at the same time is rare except for Korea and Japan. The basic right of labor, as anyone perceives, is the basic right prescribed for workers. But these regulations give rise to questions. What is the relationship between the right to work and the labor’s three primary rights.
The principle of positive law is that labor rights are applied first between right to work and labor’s three primary rights. In fact, the labor management issues should be resolved voluntarily by the labor authorities. By the way, given the fact that labor union membership remains around 10%, most workers who do not belong to the labor union are protected by the right to work. In theory, labor’s three primary rights are the first to protect workers, whereas in reality workers are protected by labor rights.
Recognizing this reality, I was told about France’s labor reform law. The content of France’s labor reform law is the integration of the individual labor relations law and the collective labor-management relations law, and the direction changes to the structure of civil law. Korea needed to see if it could integrate the individual labor relations law and the collective labor-management relations law like the France’s labor reform law, and looked at the relationship between the two as the forward stage.
In order to integrate the two laws as a result, it would have to be the logic of respecting the will of th parties. In order words, the will of worker and employer should always take precedence except for absolute social order on the assumption of equal power between workers and employers. In this case, it is also necessary to change the labor law as a fair in order to protect a worker-lice person or small subcontractors. In other words, labor law can be recognized as a fairness of protercting labor value properly.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 西谷敏, "勞動組合法" 有斐閣 2006

2 정종섭, "헌법학원론" 박영사 2008

3 권영성, "헌법학원론" 법문사 2010

4 장영수, "헌법학" 홍문사 2011

5 한수웅, "헌법학" 법문사 2015

6 홍성방, "헌법학" 현암사 2008

7 허영, "헌법이론과 헌법(중)" 박영사 1992

8 노호창, "헌법상 근로권의 내용과 성격에 대한 재해석" 서울대학교노동법연구회 (30) : 125-164, 2011

9 윤수정, "헌법개정과 사회적 기본권" 법학연구소 29 (29): 117-149, 2018

10 전광석, "한국헌법론" 법문사 2009

11 허영, "한국헌법론" 박영사 2007

12 전학선, "프랑스의 법령체계 및 법치주의에 관한 연구" 한국비교공법학회 12 (12): 199-229, 2011

13 김상호, "프랑스의 노동법전 개혁에 관한 비교법적 고찰" 비교법학연구소 52 : 1-43, 2017

14 김충희, "프랑스 역대 헌법전 (2․완)" 법학연구소 (70) : 471-597, 2016

15 이승욱, "산별노동조합의 노동법상 쟁점과 과제" 서울대학교노동법연구회 12 : 6-240, 2002

16 김준호, "민법강의" 법문사 2013

17 이학춘, "독일노동법" 한국경영자총협회 2002

18 박종희, "단체교섭 당사자 확정의 법리 ―자율성과 효율성, 특히 단위노동조합 하부조직인 지부·분회와 연합단체의 단체교섭 당사자 적격성을 중심으로―" 한국노동법학회 (17) : 2003

19 김유성, "노동법 1" 법문사 1998

20 박상필, "노동법" 대왕사 1999

21 이달휴, "노동3권상 근로자개념" 한국노동법학회 (53) : 189-220, 2015

22 한인상, "근로권의 의의와 주요 입법과제" 서울대학교노동법연구회 (36) : 73-118, 2014

23 片岡昇, "英國勞動法理論史" 有斐閣 1956

24 マンフレ-ト· レ- ヴィツシュ, "現代 ドイツ勞動法" 法律文化史 1995

25 佐藤幸治, "日本國憲法論" 成文堂 2011

26 吉田善明, "日本國憲法論" 三省堂 2006

27 李準一, "基本權으로서 保護權과 基本權의 第3者效" 한국법학원 65 : 65-86, 2002

28 末弘厳太郎, "労働法のはなし" 一洋社 1947

29 石田 眞, "労働と法・私の論点／日本労働法学事始め探索・余聞―末弘厳太郎『労働法制開講をめぐって・再論―" (1836) : 2015

30 石田 眞, "労働と法・私の論点／日本労働法学事始め探索の顛末―末弘厳太郎『労働法制』開講をめぐって―" (1812) : 2014

31 野田 進, "フランス「労働改革法」の成立 — 規範の逆転と企業協定の締結システム —" 한국비교노동법학회 43 : 1-34, 2018

32 西谷敏, "ドイツ勞動法思想史論" 日本評論社 1987

33 石田 眞, "わが国労働法学の黎明―昭和年代前期における孫田秀春の足跡をたどる―" (93) : 2014

34 이달휴, "“헌법상” 근로권에 있어서 근로자개념" 한국비교공법학회 12 (12): 3-26, 2011