언어,교육 : 한,중 한자교육 비교 = Articles : Language,Education ; A Comparative Study of the Chinese Characters education in Korea and China

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Hanja used in Korean are traditional Chinese characters, but what Chinese people use now is simplified characters. So, there are differences in pronunciation and meaning between the characters used by Korean and Chinese. More than 70% of the Korean language vocabulary derived from or were influenced by hanja. For the inheritance and development of traditional culture,and for the communication among countries of the Chinese characters cultural circle in Northeast Asia, should we build up an authentic Chinese education system. But the government hasn`t pay much attention to this work, and the government`s policy can`t implement the efficient education. Consequently, in these days, there are more and more Korean people who are functionally illiterate in Chinese. Recently, proficiency tests of Chinese characters are expected to promote the development of Chinese education. But, most Koreans` motives for Chinese study are usually to pass the college entrance exam or to compete for jobs. However, after passing the test, the motive for studying gradually fade away. It is the basic problem faced by Korean Chinese character education. Since the 1950s, various character education methods have been studied in China, the research results were appliedin their textbooks and other materials. Therefore, a well-organized and efficient learning-by-step education system was built up. At present, China`s literacy education in the textbooks utilizes a range of methods including revisional centralized and distributed. Unfortunately, there is still one shortcoming worthy of concerns: how to solve the problems due to the simplification of traditional Chinese characters? Is it possible to revive traditional Chinese characters? Before adopting the results of research on China`s literacy education and applying them to our character education, we should consider our specific situation carefully. Adopting the research results with cautious review and objective criticism should have a positive impact on Korean Chinese character education.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정연실, "한국의 한자교육" 2008

2 정연실, "중국의 한자교육방법 고찰" 중국학연구회 (42) : 3-32, 2007

3 楊沅錫, "중국의 現代漢字學 硏究와 漢字敎育" (창간) : 2005

4 정연실, "중국어 교육용 기초한자 선정기준에 관한 고찰" 한국중국어교육학회 (13) : 219-235, 2011

5 정연실, "중국 초등학교『語文』(人敎版 1ㆍ2학년)의 한자교육" 중국학연구회 (45) : 91-112, 2008

6 김여주, "동아시아 漢字ㆍ漢文敎育의 發展的 提言" 한국한문교육학회 (33) : 7-19, 2009

7 윤재민, "韓國漢文敎育學, 되돌아보기와 내다보기-‘漢文科 敎育課程의 變遷 樣相’을 포함하여" 한국한문교육학회 (37) : 5-29, 2011

8 河永三, "韓國漢字敎育現況及對策分析" 7 : 2010

9 楊 恬, "韓中現行漢字差異的文化取向" 2009

10 葛振家, "漢字與漢字敎育在韓國" 2001

11 민현식, "國語敎育 政策 改善을 통한 漢字語 敎育 强化 方案" 한국어문교육연구회 37 (37): 439-463, 2009

12 배수찬(裵秀燦), "古典의 通路로서 漢字와 國語敎育의 확충" 한국어문교육연구회 36 (36): 497-519, 2008

13 남기탁, "全國漢字能力檢定試驗과 漢字敎育" 한국어문교육연구회 39 (39): 7-30, 2011

14 허철, "中國 漢字敎育의 歷史와 內容에 대하여" 한국한문교육학회 23 (23): 15-56, 2004

15 현대경제연구원, "2012 글로벌 10대 트렌드" 2011