Attempts at Fair Sentencing in the United States and Korea:A Historical View of Sentencing Guidelines and Mandatory Minimums in Two Vastly Different Criminal Justice Systems

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Since the 1970s, the United States has relied on Sentencing Guidelines and Mandatory Minimums to punish criminal defendants. The United States Sentencing Commission was created to help reduce sentencing disparity and create uniform sentencing in the federal criminal justice system. The implementation of the federal sentencing guidelines has resulted in numerous legislative and judicial battles and a drastic increase in the prison population.
To decrease sentencing disparity, reduce prosecutorial favoritism and increase public trust in the criminal justice system, Korea has recently begun to implement the sentencing guidelines. In 2007, the Korean Sentencing Commission was created. Korea has chosen to implement the gradual and narrative model of sentencing guidelines rather than the “grid” model that the United States uses. This article will explore the history and results of the 40 years of United States sentencing guidelines and the emergence of the Korean sentencing guidelines and compare the two.
Korea, a country with a nearly racially homogeneous population, a criminal justice system that does not engage in plea bargaining, and a comparatively low percentage of drug crimes system to the United States will not face some of the problems that the United States criminal justice system faces. Despite these differences, Korea is moving away from judicial discretion and can look to the past in the United States as a way to see the effects of lessened judicial discretion. By balancing the desire for conformity in sentencing with the need for judicial discretion and taking the gradual and narrative approach to sentencing guidelines, it is hopeful that Korea will avoid many of these problems and will not suffer from increased incarceration or any of the other problems that the United States has faced in the past 40 years.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christopher-zoukis/ussc-unanimously-votes-prison-reform_b_5601073. html"

2 "http://www.bop.gov/locations/weekly_report.jsp"

3 Jung-sik Gong, "Wicked Stepmothers Jailed, but not for Very Long"

4 Jed S. Rakoff, "Why Innocent People Plead Guilty"

5 Jacob Sullum, "Why 97% of Federal Drug Offenders Plead Guilty"

6 Federal Bureau of Prisons, "Weekly Population Report (Oct. 16, 2014)" 2014

7 "Violent Crime and Drug Enforcement Improvement Act of 1982, S. 2572"

8 "Va.Code §§17.1-800 to 17.1-806, 19.2-298.01"

9 "Utah Code Ann. §§63-25a-301 to 63-25a-306"

10 "United States v. Booker, 543 US 220"

11 Christopher Zoukis, "USSC Unanimously Votes for Drug Reduction Retroactivity: Thousands of Federal Prisoners to be Released Early"

12 U.S. Sentencing Comm’n, "US Sentencing Commission Votes to Reduce Drug Trafficking Sentences"

13 "U.S. Sentencing Comm’n, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual"

14 Rahn Kim, "Top Court Confirms Jail Term for SK Chairman’s Ex-advisor"

15 Donna M. Hartman, "The Social Construction of the Crack Epidemic in the Print Media" 31 : 1999

16 Marc Mauer, "The Sentencing Project, On Trends in Sentencing and Incarceration, Testimony before the U.S. Nevada Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice"

17 Erik S. Siebert, "The Process is the Problem: Lessons Learned from United States Drug Sentencing Reform" 44-, 2010

18 Kate Stith, "The Politics of Sentencing Reform: The Legislative History of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Faculty Scholarship Series (Yale University), Paper 1273"

19 National Research Council, "The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences" 47-55, 2014

20 Stephanos Bibas, "The Feeney Amendment and the Continuing Rise of Prosecutorial Power to Plea Bargain" 94 : 295-297, 2004

21 Hyung Kwan Park, "The Basic Features of the First Korean Sentencing Guidelines" 22 : 262-, 2009

22 "Tenn.Code Ann. §§40-35-101 to 40-35-122"

23 "Statement of Harley G. Lappin, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies 1"

24 U.S. Sentencing Comm’n, "Special Report to the Congress: Continuing Impact of United States v. Booker on Federal Sentencing" 2012

25 Nathan Schwartzman, "South Korean Legal System to Introduce Plea Bargaining, Asian Correspondent"

26 Fiedler Daniel Lee, "Sentencing Guidelines in South Korea: Lessons from the American Experience" 법학연구소 10 (10): 111-141, 2010

27 U.S. Sentencing Comm’n, "SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT ON THE INITIAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES AND POLICY STATEMENTS 1–2"

28 U.S. Sentencing Comm’n, "SPECIAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS: COCAINE AND FEDERAL SENTENCING POLICY 195–96 [hereinafter 1995 COCAINE REPORT]"

29 U.S. Sentencing Comm’n, "SPECIAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESS: COCAINE AND FEDERAL SENTENCING POLICY 1 [hereinafter 1997 COCAINE REPORT]"

30 "S.C. Code §§24-26-10 to 24-26-60"

31 "S. REP. NO. 98-225, at 40"

32 "S. 829, 98th Cong. ; see also Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1983, S. 829"

33 "S. 2699, 94th Cong., 121 CONG. REC. 37,563"

34 Joe Palazzolo, "Racial Gap in Men’s Sentencing"

35 U.S. Sentencing Comm’n, "REPORT TO THE CONGRESS: COCAINE AND FEDERAL SENTENCING POLICY viii [hereinafter 2002 COCAINE REPORT]" 2002

36 "Pub. L. No. 99-570, tit. I, § 1002, 100 Stat. 3207, 3207-2 to 3207-4 (codified at 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)–(C))"

37 "Pub. L. No. 98-473, tit. II, 98 Stat. 1987 (codified in scattered sections of 18 and 28 U.S.C.)"

38 "Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools to End the Exploitation of Children Today (PROTECT) Act of 2003"

39 Supreme Court of Korea, "Proceedings, Criminal Case"

40 Paul Guerino, "Prisoners in 2010"

41 Pew Ctr., "Pew Ctr. on the States, One in 100: Behind Bars in America 2008, Pew Charitable Trusts 3"

42 "Pa.Stat.Ann. tit. 42, §§2151-2156"

43 "Ore.Rev.Stat.§§137.667 to 137.671"

44 "Ohio Rev. Code ann. §§181.21 to 181.56"

45 "N.C.Gen. Stat. §§15A-1340.13 to 1340.17"

46 "Mo.Ann.Stat.§558.019"

47 "Minn.Stat.Ann. ch.244 App"

48 "Mich.Comp.Laws Ann. ch. 777"

49 "Md.Crim.Pro. §§6-201 to 6-216"

50 "Mass.Gen.Laws Ann. ch.211E, §§1-4"

51 Sonja B. Starr, "Mandatory Sentencing and Racial Disparity: Assessing the Role of Prosecutors and the Effects of Booker" 123 : 2-, 2013

52 "La.Rev. Stat.Ann. §§15:321 to 15:324"

53 "Korean Criminal Procedure Act"

54 "Korean Court Organizational Act, art 82.2"

55 Kim Rahn, "Korea to Adopt Plea Bargaining"

56 "Kimbrough v. United States 552 U.S. 85"

57 "Kan.Stat.Ann. §§21-6801 to 21-6828"

58 Sangjoon Kim, "Judge-Jury Agreement in Criminal Cases: The First Three Years of the Korean Jury System" 10 : 35-39, 2013

59 "Ill. Comp.Stat.Ann. ch.730, §§5/5-5-3.1, 5/5/-5-3.2"

60 "Human Rights Watch interview with former federal prosecutor (name withheld)"

61 "Gall v. United States, 552 US 38"

62 U.S. Sentencing Comm’n, "Frequently Asked Questions: Retroactive Application of the 2014 Drug Guidelines Amendment"

63 Ilene H. Nagel, "Foreword, Structuring Sentencing Discretion: The New Federal Sentencing Guidelines" 80 : 883-, 1990

64 "Fla.Stat. Ann. §§921.001 to 921.00265"

65 Eun-Gyo Jang, "First “Severe” Punishment for Business Tycoon after the Implementation of the “Sentencing Guidelines”"

66 Charles Doyle, "Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Statutes" 2013

67 Michael Nachmanoff, "Fed. Pub. Defender, E. Dist. of Va., The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984: 25 Years Later, Testimony before the U.S. Sentencing Commission"

68 "Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, Pub. L. No. 111-220, 124 Stat. 2372"

69 "FBI Uniform Crime Report, Crime in the United States 2011- Arrests" 2012

70 "Drug Sentencing Reform Act of 2001, S. 1874, 107th Cong"

71 Supreme Prosecutors’ Office, Narcotics Division, "Drug Control in Korea 2012"

72 "Del.Code Ann. tit.11, §§6580 to 6581A"

73 Frank O. Bowman, III, "Dead Law Walking: The Surprising Tenacity of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines" 51 : 1227-, 2014

74 John Riley, "Criminal Code Reform Picks Up Steam" 1983

75 "Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. §54-300"

76 Steven L. Chanenson, "Booker on Crack: Sentencing’s Latest Gordian Knot" 15 : 551-, 2006

77 "Black’s Law Dictionary 1367"

78 "Ark.Code Ann. §§16-90-801 to 16-90-804"

79 U.S. Sentencing Comm’n, "An Overview of the United States Sentencing Commission"

80 Human Rights Watch, "An Offer You Can’t Refuse, How US Federal Prosecutors Force Drug Defendants to Plead Guilty"

81 "Alaska Stat. §12.55.125(c) to (e)"

82 "Ala.Code §§12-25-1 to 12-25-12"

83 Paul H. Robinson, "A Sentencing System for the 21st Century?" 66 : 1-, 1987

84 Dong-Woo Jang, "A Brief Look at Sentencing Factors in South Korean Courts"

85 "98th Cong., 129 CONG. REC. 5520, 5521–71"

86 "97th Cong., 128 CONG. REC. 11,817–24 ; Criminal Code Reform Act of 1979, S. 1722"

87 "96th Cong., 125 CONG. REC. 23,537–45; Criminal Code Reform Act of 1977, S. 1437"

88 "95th Cong., 123 CONG. REC. 13,061–69"

89 "668, 98th Cong., 129 CONG. REC. 3,797–814 (1983)"

90 Kristen Gwynne, "4 Biggest Myths About Crack"

91 "2013 Federal Sentencing Guidelines Manual"