RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      ‘AI 펭톡’과 영어 원어민의 초등학생 영어 발음평가에 관한 비교연구 = A study on the comparison of AI Pengtalk’s and English native speakers’ assessment of elementary students’ English pronunciation

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108361498

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper compares the A.I. Pengtalk’s and English native speakers’ assessment of Korean-speaking children’s English pronunciation. For this, 60 sixth-graders participated as assessees and four English native speakers as assessors. The students...

      This paper compares the A.I. Pengtalk’s and English native speakers’ assessment of Korean-speaking children’s English pronunciation. For this, 60 sixth-graders participated as assessees and four English native speakers as assessors. The students enunciated 10 English sentences, repeating after Pengtalk, and their speech was recorded. Pengtalk assessed the students’ pronunciation in a three-point scale for overall accuracy and a five-point scale for accuracy of four phonological elements. The native English-speaking assessors listened to and rated the students’ recordings using the rubric offered in Pengtalk. The assessment results were analyzed using t-tests and one-way ANOVA. The findings are as follows. First, Pengtalk tended to rate the students’ overall pronunciation accuracy and their accuracy in the four elements, and across students’ English proficiency levels, significantly lower than the native assessors. Second, Pengtalk and the native assessors differed in the accuracy order of the four elements. Third, variations in the accuracy order according to students’ proficiency levels were greater in Pengtalk than among native assessors. Fourth, Pengtalk’s automatic speech recognition sometimes failed to distinguish English fricatives from stops. Fifth, Pengtalk’s overall pronunciation assessment of a sentence sometimes disconformed with its assessment of the four elements. Based on these results, suggestions are made for developing and using AI chatbot programs from the perspective of English pronunciation teaching.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 서론
      • II. 이론적 배경
      • III. 연구 방법
      • IV. 연구 결과 및 논의
      • V. 결론 및 제언
      • I. 서론
      • II. 이론적 배경
      • III. 연구 방법
      • IV. 연구 결과 및 논의
      • V. 결론 및 제언
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼