RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      남중국해 분쟁과 미중의 전략적 경쟁 = The Strategic Competition of U.S. and China in the South China Sea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100201905

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this article is to analyze the Strategic Competition of U.S. and China in the South China Sea. For this purpose this article is to examine the implications of power politics in the South China Sea disputes, which basically involve the United States, and other claimant countries, such as Vietnam and the Philippines on one side, and China on the other. The two main actors, namely China and the United States, appear to be re-assertive. The fall-out is the polarization of the stakeholders and greater military build-up. Overt military confrontation is a remote possibility at the moment, mainly because of overriding considerations, such as interdependence in economy and a trend towards regionalism. Nevertheless, the array of sophisticated military forces and the vital national interests of the stakeholders in the Sea tend to portend a problematic frontier. This article indicates certain policy implications and attempts to develop the framework of a scenario that is likely to emerge premised on power politics.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this article is to analyze the Strategic Competition of U.S. and China in the South China Sea. For this purpose this article is to examine the implications of power politics in the South China Sea disputes, which basically involve the U...

      The purpose of this article is to analyze the Strategic Competition of U.S. and China in the South China Sea. For this purpose this article is to examine the implications of power politics in the South China Sea disputes, which basically involve the United States, and other claimant countries, such as Vietnam and the Philippines on one side, and China on the other. The two main actors, namely China and the United States, appear to be re-assertive. The fall-out is the polarization of the stakeholders and greater military build-up. Overt military confrontation is a remote possibility at the moment, mainly because of overriding considerations, such as interdependence in economy and a trend towards regionalism. Nevertheless, the array of sophisticated military forces and the vital national interests of the stakeholders in the Sea tend to portend a problematic frontier. This article indicates certain policy implications and attempts to develop the framework of a scenario that is likely to emerge premised on power politics.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김석우, "현대 국제정치 핵심논쟁 12제" 오름 : 254 ~, 2001

      2 문정인, "중국의 내일을 묻다" 삼성경제연구소 : 31 ~, 2010

      3 외교통상부, "중국 관련 주요 통계(2010년 말 현재)" 2011

      4 제레미 블랙, "전쟁은 왜 일어나는가" 이가서 : 311 ~, 2003

      5 하영선, "변환의 세계정치" 을유문화사 : 74 ~, 2007

      6 박사명, "동남아의 정치변동의 동학 : 225 ~" 2004

      7 김석수, "남중국해 분쟁의 국제관계 - 파라셀과 스프래틀리군도 분쟁을 중심으로 -" 국가안보와 전략 10 (4) : 257 ~ 286, 2010

      8 최원목, "국제법 강의" 이화여자대학교출판부 : 21 ~, 2007

      9 Martin A. Smith, "in the Changing Global Order: The US, Russia and China" Polity Press : 39 ~, 2012

      10 A. F. K. Organski, "World Politics" Knopf, 1958

      1 김석우, "현대 국제정치 핵심논쟁 12제" 오름 : 254 ~, 2001

      2 문정인, "중국의 내일을 묻다" 삼성경제연구소 : 31 ~, 2010

      3 외교통상부, "중국 관련 주요 통계(2010년 말 현재)" 2011

      4 제레미 블랙, "전쟁은 왜 일어나는가" 이가서 : 311 ~, 2003

      5 하영선, "변환의 세계정치" 을유문화사 : 74 ~, 2007

      6 박사명, "동남아의 정치변동의 동학 : 225 ~" 2004

      7 김석수, "남중국해 분쟁의 국제관계 - 파라셀과 스프래틀리군도 분쟁을 중심으로 -" 국가안보와 전략 10 (4) : 257 ~ 286, 2010

      8 최원목, "국제법 강의" 이화여자대학교출판부 : 21 ~, 2007

      9 Martin A. Smith, "in the Changing Global Order: The US, Russia and China" Polity Press : 39 ~, 2012

      10 A. F. K. Organski, "World Politics" Knopf, 1958

      11 Min-Hyung Kim, "Why Does A Small Power Lead? ASEAN Leadership in Asia-Pacific Regionalism" Pacific Focus 27 (1) : 111 ~ 134, 2012

      12 Vesna Danilovic, "When the Stakes Are High: Deterrence and Conflict among Major Powers" University of Michigan Press, 2002

      13 James Dobbins, "War with China" Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 54 (4) : 12 ~, 2012

      14 Ristian Atriandi Supriyanto, "U.S. Pivots to Maritime Southeast Asia" RSIS Commentaries(22 May), 2012

      15 A. F. K. Organski, "The War Ledger" University of Chicago Press : 18 ~ 28, 1980

      16 Robert J. Art, "The United States and the Rise of China: Implications for the Long Haul" Political Science Quarterly 125 (3) : 359 ~ 391, 2010

      17 Robert Gilpin, "The Theory of Hegemonic War" The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 18 : 591 ~ 613, 1988

      18 Robert D. Kaplan, "The South China Sea Is the Future of Conflict: The 21st Century’s Defining Battleground Is Going to Be on Water" Foreign Policy(September/October), 2011

      19 Aileen San Pablo-Baveria, "The South China Sea Disputes: Is Aquino Way the ‘ASEAN Way’?" RSIS Commentaries, 2012

      20 Scott Snyder, "The South China Sea Dispute: Prospects for Preventive Diplomacy" 1996

      21 Renato Cruz De Castro, "The Risk of Applying Realpolitik in Resolving the South China Sea Dispute: Implications on Regional Security" Pacific Focus 27 (2) : 262 ~ 289, 2012

      22 Michael Miller, "The Reaction of Small States to the Advancement of the People's Republic of China in the South China Sea" Western Michigan University, 2013

      23 Aaron L. Friedberg, "The Future of U.S.–China Relations: Is Conflict Inevitable?" International Security 30 (2) : 26 ~, 2005

      24 Robert Beckman, "The China-Philippines Dispute in the South China Sea: Does Beijing have a Legitimate Claim?" East Asia Forum(28 March), 2012

      25 Robert M Gates, "Strengthening Security Partnerships in the Asia-Pacific" The IISS Asia Security Summit, 2010

      26 Nien-Tsu Alfred Hu, "South China Sea: Troubled Sea or A Sea of Opportunity?" Ocean Development and International Law 41 (3) : 204 ~, 2010

      27 Sam Bateman, "Solving the ‘Wicked Problem’ of Maritime Security: Are Regional Forums Up to the Task?" Contemporary Southeast Asia 33 (1) : 2 ~, 2011

      28 Richard A., Bitzinger, "Sea Battle: Old Wine in New Bottles?" RSIS Commentaries(23 August), 2012

      29 Carnes Lord, "Rebalancing U.S. Forces: Basing and Forward Presence in the Asia-Pacific" Maryland Naval Institute Press : 37 ~, 2014

      30 Jack S. Levy, "Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations" International Studies Quarterly 41 (1), 1997

      31 Amitav Acharya, "Power Shift or Paradigm Shift? China’s Rise and Asia’s Emerging Security Order" International Studies Quarterly 58 : 158 ~ 173, 2014

      32 "Philippines Takes China Island Dispute to UN Tribunal" Voice of America (22 January 2013), 2013

      33 Kishore Mahbubani, "Obama’s Chance to Fashion a New Global Order" Financial Times(7 November), 2012

      34 Rowan Scarborough, "Navy Readies for Chinese Power Grab on Shipping: US Boosts Forces in Western Pacific" Washington Post(10 January), 2012

      35 Hengxin Pan, "Is the South China Sea a New ‘Dangerous Ground’ for U.S.–China Rivalry?" East Asia Forum, 2011

      36 Joseph Bafumi, "International Polarity and America’s Polarization" International Politics 49 : 24 ~, 2012

      37 "Information Office of the State Council, China’s-National-Defense 2010" Information Office of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China(31 March), 2011

      38 Sam Bateman, "Increasing Competition in the South China Sea: Need for a New Game Plan" RSIS Commentaries (21 August), 2012

      39 Oshua Kurlantzick, "Growing U.S. Role in South China Sea" Council on Foreign Relations (11 October), 2011

      40 M. Taylor Fravel, "Cooperation from Strength: The United States, China, and the South China Sea" Center for a New American Security : 42 ~, 2012

      41 Patrick M. Cronin, "Cooperation from Strength: The United States, China, and the South China Sea" Center for a New American Security : 12 ~, 2012

      42 Ian Storey, "Cooperation from Strength: The United States, China, and the South China Sea" Center for a New American Security : 63 ~, 2012

      43 Li Mingjian, "Chinese Debates of South China Sea Policy: Implications for Future Developments : 4 ~" 2012

      44 ToshiYoshihara, "Can China Defend a ‘Core Interest’ in the South China Sea?" The Washington Quarterly 34 (2) : 45 ~, 2011

      45 Christopher Freise, "By Invitation, Mostly: the International Politics of the US Security Presence, China, and the South China Sea : 17 ~" 2012

      46 Trevor Taylor, "Approaches and Theory in International Relations" Longman : 122 ~ 140, 1978

      47 Nguyen Hong Thao, "A New Legal Arrangement for the South China Sea?" Ocean Development & International Law 40 (4) : 333 ~, 2009

      48 박광희, "21세기의 세계질서(변혁시대의 적응논리)" 오름 : 63 ~, 2003

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼