RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

      A prospective randomized controlled double-blind study comparing auscultation and lung ultrasonography in the assessment of double lumen tube position in elective thoracic surgeries involving one lung ventilation at a tertiary care cancer institute

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106642689

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: As lung ultrasound (LUS) can be used to identify regional lung ventilation and collapse, we hypothesize that LUS can be better than auscultation in assessing lung isolation and determining double lumen tube (DLT) position. Methods: A rand...

      Background: As lung ultrasound (LUS) can be used to identify regional lung ventilation and collapse, we hypothesize that LUS can be better than auscultation in assessing lung isolation and determining double lumen tube (DLT) position.
      Methods: A randomized controlled study was conducted in tertiary care cancer institute from November 2014 to December 2015, including 100 adult patients undergoing elective thoracic surgeries. Patients with tracheostomy, difficult airway and pleural-based pathologies were excluded. After anesthesia induction and DLT insertion, patients were randomized into group A (auscultation) and group B (LUS). Regional ventilation was assessed by experienced anesthesiologists using the respective method for each group. Final confirmation of DLT position with a bronchoscope was performed by a blinded anesthesiologist. Contingency tables were plotted to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy for each method.
      Results: Data from 91 patients were analyzed (group A = 47, group B = 44). Compared with auscultation, LUS had significantly higher sensitivity (94.1% vs. 73.3%, P = 0.010), PPV (57.1% vs. 35.5%, P = 0.044), NPV (93.8% vs. 75.0%, P = 0.018), accuracy (70.5% vs. 48.9%, P = 0.036) and required longer median time (161.5 vs. 114 s, P < 0.001) for assessment of DLT position. Differences in specificity (55.6% vs. 37.5%, P = 0.101) and area under curve (0.748; 95% CI: 0.604–0.893 vs. 0.554, 95% CI: 0.379–0.730; P = 0.109) were not significant.
      Conclusions: Compared to auscultation, LUS is a superior method for assessing lung isolation and determining DLT position.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Ponsonnard S, "Value of lung sonography to control right-sided double lumen endotracheal tube location" 5 : 1000453-, 2014

      2 Lyon M, "Ultrasound detection of the sliding lung sign by prehospital critical care providers" 30 : 485-488, 2012

      3 Das SK, "Transtracheal ultrasound for verification of endotracheal tube placement : a systematic review and meta-analysis" 62 : 413-423, 2015

      4 Saporito A, "Thoracic ultrasound confirmation of correct lung exclusion before onelung ventilation during thoracic surgery" 16 : 195-199, 2013

      5 Lichtenstein DA, "The"lung pulse" : an early ultrasound sign of complete atelectasis" 29 : 2187-2192, 2003

      6 남재식, "The use of lung ultrasonography to confirm lung isolation in an infant who underwent emergent videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery -a case report-" 대한마취통증의학회 68 (68): 411-414, 2015

      7 Sustić A, "The addition of a brief ultrasound examination to clinical assessment increases the ability to confirm placement of double-lumen endotracheal tubes" 22 : 246-249, 2010

      8 Pfeiffer P, "Temporal comparison of ultrasound vs. auscultation and capnography in verification of endotracheal tube placement" 55 : 1190-1195, 2011

      9 Alliaume B, "Reliability of auscultation in positioning of double-lumen endobronchial tubes" 39 : 687-690, 1992

      10 Blaivas M, "Point-of-care sonographic detection of left endobronchial main stem intubation and obstruction versus endotracheal intubation" 27 : 785-789, 2008

      1 Ponsonnard S, "Value of lung sonography to control right-sided double lumen endotracheal tube location" 5 : 1000453-, 2014

      2 Lyon M, "Ultrasound detection of the sliding lung sign by prehospital critical care providers" 30 : 485-488, 2012

      3 Das SK, "Transtracheal ultrasound for verification of endotracheal tube placement : a systematic review and meta-analysis" 62 : 413-423, 2015

      4 Saporito A, "Thoracic ultrasound confirmation of correct lung exclusion before onelung ventilation during thoracic surgery" 16 : 195-199, 2013

      5 Lichtenstein DA, "The"lung pulse" : an early ultrasound sign of complete atelectasis" 29 : 2187-2192, 2003

      6 남재식, "The use of lung ultrasonography to confirm lung isolation in an infant who underwent emergent videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery -a case report-" 대한마취통증의학회 68 (68): 411-414, 2015

      7 Sustić A, "The addition of a brief ultrasound examination to clinical assessment increases the ability to confirm placement of double-lumen endotracheal tubes" 22 : 246-249, 2010

      8 Pfeiffer P, "Temporal comparison of ultrasound vs. auscultation and capnography in verification of endotracheal tube placement" 55 : 1190-1195, 2011

      9 Alliaume B, "Reliability of auscultation in positioning of double-lumen endobronchial tubes" 39 : 687-690, 1992

      10 Blaivas M, "Point-of-care sonographic detection of left endobronchial main stem intubation and obstruction versus endotracheal intubation" 27 : 785-789, 2008

      11 Smith GB, "Placement of double-lumen endobronchial tubes. Correlation between clinical impressions and bronchoscopic findings" 58 : 1317-1320, 1986

      12 de Bellis M, "Is flexible bronchoscopy necessary to confirm the position of double-lumen tubes before thoracic surgery" 40 : 912-916, 2011

      13 Cunningham J, "Enhanced recognition of"lung sliding"with power color Doppler imaging in the diagnosis of pneumothorax" 52 : 769-771, 2002

      14 Cohen E, "Double-lumen tube position should be confirmed by fiberoptic bronchoscopy" 17 : 1-6, 2004

      15 Álvarez-Díaz N, "Comparison between transthoracic lung ultrasound and a clinical method in confirming the position of double-lumen tube in thoracic anaesthesia. A pilot study" 62 : 305-312, 2015

      16 Parab SY, "A prospective comparative study to evaluate the utility of lung ultrasonography to improve the accuracy of traditional clinical methods to confirm position of left sided double lumen tube in elective thoracic surgeries" 59 : 476-481, 2015

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-11-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회 -> 대한마취통증의학회 KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-07-20 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회지 -> Korean Journal of Anesthesiology KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.09 0.09 0.1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.09 0.09 0.27 0.01
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼