RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      학문으로서 법학의 위기와 그 대응 방안 -「법학전문대학원 설치·운영에 관한 법률」 제8조의 폐지를 중심으로-

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The discipline of law as an academic field is currently facing a significant crisis, raising concerns about the potential disintegration of the legal scholarly community. Recent discussions on various topics, including the reform of the law school system and the improvement of the bar examination system, have directly or indirectly addressed the crisis facing the legal field. A central reason of this crisis, however, can be attributed to Article 8 of the Law Graduate School Establishment Act. This provision mandates the abolition of undergraduate law programs at universities hosting graduate law schools. Consequently, the 25 universities that established garduate law schools under this framework have eliminated their undergraduate law programs.<BR/> While the causes of the crisis in legal studies can be attributed to various factors, the abolition of undergraduate law programs - driven by a policy decision that considered the dual-track structure of legal education at the graduate and undergraduate levels to be inappropriate - has been a major contributor to the absence of undergraduate legal education and the broader crisis of law as an academic discipline. Notably, the decision to eliminate undergraduate programs was not based on a compelling necessity (it must be done) but rather on a judgment of desirability (it would be preferable). However, Article 8 of this law, which prohibits universities with established law schools from offering undergraduate law degree programs, raises significant constitutional concerns, including potential violations of the right to equality, academic freedom, and the freedom to choose one's profession.<BR/> Therefore, it would be desirable to either repeal the provision legislatively or have it invalidated through a decision by the Constitutional Court. The revival of undergraduate law programs would not only reinvigorate legal education at the undergraduate level but also enable the influx of new generations into the field of legal studies. Additionally, it would provide diverse career opportunities for graduates of undergraduate law programs. Most importantly, undergraduate legal education could serve as a complement to legal education in law schools, enhancing the overall quality and depth of the discipline.
      번역하기

      The discipline of law as an academic field is currently facing a significant crisis, raising concerns about the potential disintegration of the legal scholarly community. Recent discussions on various topics, including the reform of the law school sys...

      The discipline of law as an academic field is currently facing a significant crisis, raising concerns about the potential disintegration of the legal scholarly community. Recent discussions on various topics, including the reform of the law school system and the improvement of the bar examination system, have directly or indirectly addressed the crisis facing the legal field. A central reason of this crisis, however, can be attributed to Article 8 of the Law Graduate School Establishment Act. This provision mandates the abolition of undergraduate law programs at universities hosting graduate law schools. Consequently, the 25 universities that established garduate law schools under this framework have eliminated their undergraduate law programs.<BR/> While the causes of the crisis in legal studies can be attributed to various factors, the abolition of undergraduate law programs - driven by a policy decision that considered the dual-track structure of legal education at the graduate and undergraduate levels to be inappropriate - has been a major contributor to the absence of undergraduate legal education and the broader crisis of law as an academic discipline. Notably, the decision to eliminate undergraduate programs was not based on a compelling necessity (it must be done) but rather on a judgment of desirability (it would be preferable). However, Article 8 of this law, which prohibits universities with established law schools from offering undergraduate law degree programs, raises significant constitutional concerns, including potential violations of the right to equality, academic freedom, and the freedom to choose one's profession.<BR/> Therefore, it would be desirable to either repeal the provision legislatively or have it invalidated through a decision by the Constitutional Court. The revival of undergraduate law programs would not only reinvigorate legal education at the undergraduate level but also enable the influx of new generations into the field of legal studies. Additionally, it would provide diverse career opportunities for graduates of undergraduate law programs. Most importantly, undergraduate legal education could serve as a complement to legal education in law schools, enhancing the overall quality and depth of the discipline.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼