RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      The Impact of Shipping Alliance Restructuring on World Hub Ports: Gemini in 2025 and Its Influence on Busan Port

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109373527

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose – The purpose of this research is to determine the impact of the new market structure arising from Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd’s alliance, Gemini, on Busan port as the main hub of Asia. Busan port, the world’s second-largest transshipment port, will be excluded from Gemini’s calls.
      Design/Methodology – This study builds a shipping network of alliances (including Gemini) in 2025 based on Gemini’s port call information and compares it with the shipping network of alliances in 2023. This comparison intends to identify changes in the shipping network and the shift in Busan Port’s position as a hub port. To achieve this, we use social network analysis (SNA) as a methodology, focusing on degree and betweenness centralities.
      Findings – First, Gemini significantly reduces the number of port calls to enhance punctuality, which will lead to a smaller shipping network compared with 2023’s network using SNA. Second, the results of the centrality analysis indicate a substantial rise in port rankings, such as Port Said, Tanger Med, and Tanger MedPort, which were not traditionally recognized as hub ports. Third, the analysis of the impact on Busan shows a significant decline in degree centrality (from 1st to 9th) and betweenness centrality (from 2nd to 12th), which means that Busan will dramatically drop its hub port position. The implications of these findings are as follows. First, there may be an intensive zero-sum game among Asian hub ports. Second, Busan may have a negative impact on attracting investments in new port development plans. Finally, Busan must provide incentives for the GTO (Global Terminal Operator) and eco-friendly bunkering to attract alliances.
      Originality/value – The present study is the first empirical analysis of the impact of Gemini’s launch on global hub ports using new data. This analysis differentiates itself from previous SNA studies, which mainly focused on historical port centrality trends, by analyzing the potential impacts on ports in the future. This study contributes to shipping stakeholders by providing practical implications based on the analysis results.
      번역하기

      Purpose – The purpose of this research is to determine the impact of the new market structure arising from Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd’s alliance, Gemini, on Busan port as the main hub of Asia. Busan port, the world’s second-largest transshipment por...

      Purpose – The purpose of this research is to determine the impact of the new market structure arising from Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd’s alliance, Gemini, on Busan port as the main hub of Asia. Busan port, the world’s second-largest transshipment port, will be excluded from Gemini’s calls.
      Design/Methodology – This study builds a shipping network of alliances (including Gemini) in 2025 based on Gemini’s port call information and compares it with the shipping network of alliances in 2023. This comparison intends to identify changes in the shipping network and the shift in Busan Port’s position as a hub port. To achieve this, we use social network analysis (SNA) as a methodology, focusing on degree and betweenness centralities.
      Findings – First, Gemini significantly reduces the number of port calls to enhance punctuality, which will lead to a smaller shipping network compared with 2023’s network using SNA. Second, the results of the centrality analysis indicate a substantial rise in port rankings, such as Port Said, Tanger Med, and Tanger MedPort, which were not traditionally recognized as hub ports. Third, the analysis of the impact on Busan shows a significant decline in degree centrality (from 1st to 9th) and betweenness centrality (from 2nd to 12th), which means that Busan will dramatically drop its hub port position. The implications of these findings are as follows. First, there may be an intensive zero-sum game among Asian hub ports. Second, Busan may have a negative impact on attracting investments in new port development plans. Finally, Busan must provide incentives for the GTO (Global Terminal Operator) and eco-friendly bunkering to attract alliances.
      Originality/value – The present study is the first empirical analysis of the impact of Gemini’s launch on global hub ports using new data. This analysis differentiates itself from previous SNA studies, which mainly focused on historical port centrality trends, by analyzing the potential impacts on ports in the future. This study contributes to shipping stakeholders by providing practical implications based on the analysis results.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼