RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      R&D 지원제도와 기업 R&D 지출액간 관계 분석 = An Analysis of Relationship between R&D Policies and Firm R&D Expenditures:Focused on R&D Subsidies and Tax Incentives

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104273362

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The relationship between R&D polices(R&D subsidy, tax incentives) and firm R&D expenditures is analyzed through firm's profit maximization function. As a result, the relationship between R&D policies and firm R&D expenditures is determined by the relationship between firm R&D expenditures and market price.
      In case of major innovation which cause the fall of market price, the elasticity R&D subsidy and firm R&D expenditures is negative(substitution). In case of minor innovation which cause the rise of market price, the elasticity R&D subsidy and firm R&D expenditures is positive(complement). Tax incentives is bring about the increase of firm R&D expenditures. R&D subsidy and tax incentives are substitutively influenced at firm R&D expenditures.
      번역하기

      The relationship between R&D polices(R&D subsidy, tax incentives) and firm R&D expenditures is analyzed through firm's profit maximization function. As a result, the relationship between R&D policies and firm R&D expenditures is determined by the rela...

      The relationship between R&D polices(R&D subsidy, tax incentives) and firm R&D expenditures is analyzed through firm's profit maximization function. As a result, the relationship between R&D policies and firm R&D expenditures is determined by the relationship between firm R&D expenditures and market price.
      In case of major innovation which cause the fall of market price, the elasticity R&D subsidy and firm R&D expenditures is negative(substitution). In case of minor innovation which cause the rise of market price, the elasticity R&D subsidy and firm R&D expenditures is positive(complement). Tax incentives is bring about the increase of firm R&D expenditures. R&D subsidy and tax incentives are substitutively influenced at firm R&D expenditures.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "산업기술지원사업 연차보고서 2004" 한국산업기술평가원. 2004

      2 "기업R&D에 대한 정부 자금 지원의 효과" 한국산업기술평가원. 2000

      3 "The Vertical Chain of R&D in The Pharmaceutical Industry" 1-18, 1995

      4 "The Relationship between Federal Contract R&D and Company R&D" 74 : 73-78, 1984

      5 "The Impact of Public R&D expenditure on Business R&D" OECD. 2000

      6 "Is Public R&D a complement or substitutes for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence" 29 : 497-529, 1999

      7 "Federal funding and the level of private expenditure on basic research?" 60 : 63-71, 1993

      8 "Federal Support of Technological Growth in Industry Some Evidence of Crowding Out IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management" 28 : 86-88, 1981

      9 "Estimating the impact of government R&D" 32 : 169-173, 1990

      10 "Endogenous Technological Change" (98) : 71-102, 1990

      1 "산업기술지원사업 연차보고서 2004" 한국산업기술평가원. 2004

      2 "기업R&D에 대한 정부 자금 지원의 효과" 한국산업기술평가원. 2000

      3 "The Vertical Chain of R&D in The Pharmaceutical Industry" 1-18, 1995

      4 "The Relationship between Federal Contract R&D and Company R&D" 74 : 73-78, 1984

      5 "The Impact of Public R&D expenditure on Business R&D" OECD. 2000

      6 "Is Public R&D a complement or substitutes for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence" 29 : 497-529, 1999

      7 "Federal funding and the level of private expenditure on basic research?" 60 : 63-71, 1993

      8 "Federal Support of Technological Growth in Industry Some Evidence of Crowding Out IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management" 28 : 86-88, 1981

      9 "Estimating the impact of government R&D" 32 : 169-173, 1990

      10 "Endogenous Technological Change" (98) : 71-102, 1990

      11 "Effect of government R&D on private R&D investment and productivity The Bell Journal of Economics" 14 : 551-561, 1983

      12 "Economic Welfare and The Allocation of Resources for Inventions The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity" Princeton Princeton University Press. 1962

      13 "Comparing Tax Expenditure and Direct Subsidies:The Role of Legislative Committee Structure" 72 : 421-454, 1999

      14 "Choosing Government R&D Policies:Tax Incentives vs. Direct Funding" 11 (11): 579-600, 1996

      15 "Advertising, Its Determinants, and Market Structure" 21 : 89-101, 2002

      16 "2002년도 한국의 기술혁신 조사: 제조업" 과학기술정책연구원. 2002

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-25 학술지명변경 한글명 : 기슬혁신연구 -> 기술혁신연구 KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.54 0.54 0.88
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.92 0.92 1.204 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼