Prenatal educational care(胎敎) is artificially creating a child's character but is not inherently to accept that is given. In the Han age(漢代), prenatal educational care was made to enlighten disorderly life of the imperial family, main targets ...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103773029
김종섭 (서울시립대학교)
2012
Korean
태교(胎敎) ; 품성(稟性) ; 사회통제 ; 효 ; 유교 ; prenatal educational care ; character ; social control ; filial duty ; confucianism
900
KCI등재
학술저널
187-222(36쪽)
4
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Prenatal educational care(胎敎) is artificially creating a child's character but is not inherently to accept that is given. In the Han age(漢代), prenatal educational care was made to enlighten disorderly life of the imperial family, main targets ...
Prenatal educational care(胎敎) is artificially creating a child's character but is not inherently to accept that is given. In the Han age(漢代), prenatal educational care was made to enlighten disorderly life of the imperial family, main targets were women. In the Tang age(唐代), education was valued to an unborn child at prenatal educational care, main targets changed to an unborn child. This change became a chance for spreading from imperial family to the people prenatal educational care.
The main contents of prenatal educational care is contents of Zhouwenwang(周文王)`s mother. This contents of education was transmitted into after ages. According to development of society contents of prenatal educational care was diversified by medical books, buddhism etc. Liu Xiang(劉向) argued that ideal type of human being was 'a decent appearance(容貌端正)' and 'a great talent(才德過人)' through prenatal educational care. The Tang people(唐人) thought that ideal type of human being was 'filial piety and brotherly love(孝悌)', 'extraordinary'. It is a little difference to compare idea of Liu Xiang and Tang people. But this ideal type of human being was restricted to boundary of confucianism. This mean there is another function to prenatal educational care. That is a primary function in social control. Not only pregnant women but also her husband have to be careful of behavior until a child’s birth. As a result, prenatal educational care was contributed to stability of society.
Therefore, in tang ages, prenatal educational care was operated as means of social control, produced ideal type of human being in limitation of confucianism.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 "梁書"
2 "論語" 성균관대학교출판부 1988
3 王充, "論衡" 上海人民出版社 1974
4 李華, "論『韓詩外傳』對孟子的推尊" 13 (13): 2011
5 孝元皇帝, "金樓子"
6 장정호, "한·중 전통 태교론(胎敎論) 비교 연구" 교육사학회 18 (18): 59-82, 2008
7 馮寓, "천인관계론" 신지서원 255-, 1993
8 정해은, "조선시대 태교 담론에서 바라본 이사주당의 태교론" 한국여성사학회 (10) : 1-34, 2009
9 박은희, "장안의 봄" 이산 2004
10 김정희, "당태종 평전" 서울 2011
1 "梁書"
2 "論語" 성균관대학교출판부 1988
3 王充, "論衡" 上海人民出版社 1974
4 李華, "論『韓詩外傳』對孟子的推尊" 13 (13): 2011
5 孝元皇帝, "金樓子"
6 장정호, "한·중 전통 태교론(胎敎論) 비교 연구" 교육사학회 18 (18): 59-82, 2008
7 馮寓, "천인관계론" 신지서원 255-, 1993
8 정해은, "조선시대 태교 담론에서 바라본 이사주당의 태교론" 한국여성사학회 (10) : 1-34, 2009
9 박은희, "장안의 봄" 이산 2004
10 김정희, "당태종 평전" 서울 2011
11 高至喜, "馬王堆三號漢墓的墓主到底是誰" 2000
12 顔之推, "顔氏家訓集解" 上海古籍出版社 1986
13 吳中齊, "韓嬰的敎育思想" (2) : 1996
14 吳兢, "貞觀政要" 吉川弘文館 1996
15 劉雅君, "試以秦漢史事論賈誼之諭敎太子觀" (4) : 2009
16 魏校, "莊渠遺書"
17 "舊唐書"
18 徐松, "登科記考補正" 北京燕山出版社 2003
19 "漢書"
20 杜甫, "杜詩詳註" 中和書局 1999
21 朱子, "晦庵集"
22 賈誼, "新書校注" 中華書局 2007
23 "新唐書"
24 張弓, "敦煌典籍與唐五代歷史文化(上卷)" 中國社會科學出版社 2006
25 張說, "張燕公集"
26 释道宣, "廣弘明集"
27 巢元方, "巢氏諸病源候總論"
28 司馬光, "家範"
29 贊寧, "宋高僧傳" 中華書局 1997
30 王燾, "外臺秘要方"
31 長孫無忌, "唐律疏議" 中華書局 1993
32 傅璇琮, "唐代科擧與文學" 陝西人民出版社 1995
33 吳宗國, "唐代科擧制度硏究" 遼寧大學出版社 1997
34 姚平, "唐代婦女的生命歷程" 上海古籍出版社 2004
35 周紹良, "唐代墓誌彙編續集" 上海古籍出版社 1996
36 周紹良, "唐代墓誌彙編 上下" 上海古籍出版社 1992
37 "周易正義" 中華書局 1996
38 張華, "博物志" 中華書局 1980
39 陸增祥, "八瓊室金石補" 文物出版社 1985
40 董誥, "全唐文(唐文拾遺)" 中華書局 1996
41 嚴可均, "全三國文" 商務印書館 1999
42 孫思邈, "備急千金要方"
43 張國剛, "中國家庭史-第2卷隋唐五代時期" 廣東人民出版社 2007
44 鄧義英, "『胎産書』整理本標點辯誤" (1) : 2000
45 김문경, "7~10世紀 韓中日交易關係 資料 譯註" 청아출판사 2003
豊臣秀吉의 冊封問題와 壬亂期의 講和交涉 : 정유재란의 원인을 중심으로
试论高句丽弓矢文化② ― “弓矢图”与高句丽“弓矢文化” ―
국경을 초월하여 공생하는 조선족가족 : 한국이주노동으로 인한 분산거주경험을 중심으로
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2008-07-01 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 해외민족연구소 -> 중앙사학연구소영문명 : Division for Foreign National Policy -> Institute for Historical Studies at Chung-Ang University | |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.74 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.63 | 0.65 | 1.075 | 0.18 |