RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Subscribing to an All-You-Can-Read E-Bookstore: Tariff Choice, and Contract Renewal for E-Book Purchases

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106609796

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      E-book markets are currently moving through a period of disequilibrium as new pricing structures (i.e., flat-fee subscriptions) are rapidly embraced by major vendors. On the basis of a novel dataset, we investigate how the availability of “all-you-can-read” pricing programs influences consumers’ tariff choice and contract renewal behaviors. Consistent with the rational choice framework, the findings suggest that most e-book consumers significantly gain from subscription-based tariffs. Power readers prefer flat-fee subscriptions, and those that have economically benefited renew their subscription. However, we also find some other intriguing results. Among the three subscription designs examined, the 1-week plan affords consumers more economic benefits than do 1-day or 1-month programs. Finally, iOS users are more inclined to select subscription models than are Android users because of the absence of in-app purchase functionalities for the former. The unavailability of in-app purchase affects tariff choices and transaction patterns as it increases transaction costs.
      번역하기

      E-book markets are currently moving through a period of disequilibrium as new pricing structures (i.e., flat-fee subscriptions) are rapidly embraced by major vendors. On the basis of a novel dataset, we investigate how the availability of “all-you-c...

      E-book markets are currently moving through a period of disequilibrium as new pricing structures (i.e., flat-fee subscriptions) are rapidly embraced by major vendors. On the basis of a novel dataset, we investigate how the availability of “all-you-can-read” pricing programs influences consumers’ tariff choice and contract renewal behaviors. Consistent with the rational choice framework, the findings suggest that most e-book consumers significantly gain from subscription-based tariffs. Power readers prefer flat-fee subscriptions, and those that have economically benefited renew their subscription. However, we also find some other intriguing results. Among the three subscription designs examined, the 1-week plan affords consumers more economic benefits than do 1-day or 1-month programs. Finally, iOS users are more inclined to select subscription models than are Android users because of the absence of in-app purchase functionalities for the former. The unavailability of in-app purchase affects tariff choices and transaction patterns as it increases transaction costs.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이동주, "가입형 정보통신 서비스의 구매 후 고객선택모형" 한국경영정보학회 8 (8): 159-179, 2006

      2 Choudhary, V., "Use of pricing schemes for differentiating information goods" 21 (21): 78-92, 2010

      3 Soman, D., "Transaction decoupling : How price bundling affects the decision to consume" 38 (38): 30-44, 2001

      4 Hoch, S. J., "Time-inconsistent preferences and consumer self-control" 17 (17): 492-507, 1991

      5 Prelec, D., "The red and the black : Mental accounting of savings and debt" 17 (17): 4-28, 1998

      6 Just, D., "The flat-rate pricing paradox: Conflicting effects of “All-You-CanEat” buffet pricing" 93 (93): 193-200, 2011

      7 Train, K. E., "The demand for local telephone service : A fully discrete model of residential calling patterns and service choices" 18 (18): 109-123, 1987

      8 Goettler, R. L., "Tariff choice with consumer learning and switching costs" 48 (48): 633-652, 2011

      9 Koenker, R., "Regression quantiles" 46 (46): 33-50, 1978

      10 Lambrecht, A., "Paying too much and being happy about it : Existence, causes, and consequences of tariff-choice biases" 43 (43): 212-223, 2006

      1 이동주, "가입형 정보통신 서비스의 구매 후 고객선택모형" 한국경영정보학회 8 (8): 159-179, 2006

      2 Choudhary, V., "Use of pricing schemes for differentiating information goods" 21 (21): 78-92, 2010

      3 Soman, D., "Transaction decoupling : How price bundling affects the decision to consume" 38 (38): 30-44, 2001

      4 Hoch, S. J., "Time-inconsistent preferences and consumer self-control" 17 (17): 492-507, 1991

      5 Prelec, D., "The red and the black : Mental accounting of savings and debt" 17 (17): 4-28, 1998

      6 Just, D., "The flat-rate pricing paradox: Conflicting effects of “All-You-CanEat” buffet pricing" 93 (93): 193-200, 2011

      7 Train, K. E., "The demand for local telephone service : A fully discrete model of residential calling patterns and service choices" 18 (18): 109-123, 1987

      8 Goettler, R. L., "Tariff choice with consumer learning and switching costs" 48 (48): 633-652, 2011

      9 Koenker, R., "Regression quantiles" 46 (46): 33-50, 1978

      10 Lambrecht, A., "Paying too much and being happy about it : Existence, causes, and consequences of tariff-choice biases" 43 (43): 212-223, 2006

      11 DellaVigna, S., "Paying not to go to the gym" 96 (96): 694-719, 2006

      12 Kridel, D. J., "Option value, telecommunications demand, and policy" 5 (5): 125-144, 1993

      13 Fishburn, P., "Fixed versus unit pricing for information goods : Competition, equilibria, and price wars" 2 (2): 1997

      14 양서정, "Does the SaaS Model Really Increase Customer Benefits?" 한국경영정보학회 20 (20): 87-101, 2010

      15 Coussement, K., "Customer churn prediction in the online gambling industry : The beneficial effect of ensemble learning" 66 (66): 1629-1636, 2013

      16 Miravete, E. J., "Choosing the wrong calling plan? Ignorance and learning" 93 (93): 297-310, 2003

      17 Yang, S., "Best pricing strategy for information services" 20 (20): 87-101, 2010

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.25 1.25 1.21
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.13 0.99 1.346 0.4
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼