RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      고구려 광개토왕(廣開土王)의 백제 정벌(征伐)이 가진 의미에 대하여 -392년~394년을 중심으로- = The Meaning of Invading Baekje by King Gwanggaeto of Goguryo -Focusing on between 392 A.D.~394 A.D.-

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82701793

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      King Gwanggaeto of Goguryo had a battle with Baekje between 392 A.D. and 394 A.D. This paper analyzed several combats between Goguryo and Baekje correlated with North China and Mongol area. In that time, Later-Yan and Northern Wei became emerging countries in North China and Mongol area. In 385 A.D., Goguryo had a war with Later-Yan for taking Yodong. In this battle, Goguryo was defeated by Later-Yan. There was plenty of natural resources such as iron in Yodong. At that time, the iron was fundamental element in the military forces and economic power in the nation. So it was vital to take possession of the Yodong to Goguryo. After the war between Goguryo and Later-Yan, both countries became potential enemies for each other. From 392 A.D∼to 394 A.D., Later-Yan against with Northern Wei and took a control of Geakso and Western Yan. And Later-Yan raise an large scale army to capture Sandong. It seems that only small defense troops of Later-Yan stationed in Yodong. As the unstable condition of North China, King Gwanggaeto should have invaded in Yodong area. In that time, King Gwanggaeto blitzed Baekje. Through the invasion, Goguryo took 10 castles and a castle of Goanmi in strategic point in this era. If King Gwanggaeto had invaded in Yodong, Later-Yan would have attacked Goguryo. Under these circumstances, Goguryo had to raise the tomahawk with Later-Yan and Baekje. On this reason, Goguryo did not attack Yodong. Therefore, King Gwanggaeto`s attack on Baekje came from serious consideration on Later-Yan from 392 A.D. to 394 A.D. Goguryo was surrounded by hostile countries such as Later-Yan and Baekje. Later-Yan and Baekje would have attacked on Goguryo by pincer movement. In fact, King Gwanggaeto had to meet the situation by pincer movement. Therefore King Gwanggaeto attacked Baekje in 392 A.D. Through the invasion, Goguryo made military forces of Baekje weaker. Under these circumstances, Goguryo could prepare for emergencies efficiently. In conclusion, King Gwanggaeto`s policy toward Baekje was a consideration of the situation among North China and Mongol area from 392 A.D.∼to 394 A.D.
      번역하기

      King Gwanggaeto of Goguryo had a battle with Baekje between 392 A.D. and 394 A.D. This paper analyzed several combats between Goguryo and Baekje correlated with North China and Mongol area. In that time, Later-Yan and Northern Wei became emerging coun...

      King Gwanggaeto of Goguryo had a battle with Baekje between 392 A.D. and 394 A.D. This paper analyzed several combats between Goguryo and Baekje correlated with North China and Mongol area. In that time, Later-Yan and Northern Wei became emerging countries in North China and Mongol area. In 385 A.D., Goguryo had a war with Later-Yan for taking Yodong. In this battle, Goguryo was defeated by Later-Yan. There was plenty of natural resources such as iron in Yodong. At that time, the iron was fundamental element in the military forces and economic power in the nation. So it was vital to take possession of the Yodong to Goguryo. After the war between Goguryo and Later-Yan, both countries became potential enemies for each other. From 392 A.D∼to 394 A.D., Later-Yan against with Northern Wei and took a control of Geakso and Western Yan. And Later-Yan raise an large scale army to capture Sandong. It seems that only small defense troops of Later-Yan stationed in Yodong. As the unstable condition of North China, King Gwanggaeto should have invaded in Yodong area. In that time, King Gwanggaeto blitzed Baekje. Through the invasion, Goguryo took 10 castles and a castle of Goanmi in strategic point in this era. If King Gwanggaeto had invaded in Yodong, Later-Yan would have attacked Goguryo. Under these circumstances, Goguryo had to raise the tomahawk with Later-Yan and Baekje. On this reason, Goguryo did not attack Yodong. Therefore, King Gwanggaeto`s attack on Baekje came from serious consideration on Later-Yan from 392 A.D. to 394 A.D. Goguryo was surrounded by hostile countries such as Later-Yan and Baekje. Later-Yan and Baekje would have attacked on Goguryo by pincer movement. In fact, King Gwanggaeto had to meet the situation by pincer movement. Therefore King Gwanggaeto attacked Baekje in 392 A.D. Through the invasion, Goguryo made military forces of Baekje weaker. Under these circumstances, Goguryo could prepare for emergencies efficiently. In conclusion, King Gwanggaeto`s policy toward Baekje was a consideration of the situation among North China and Mongol area from 392 A.D.∼to 394 A.D.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 여호규, "광개토왕릉비 에 나타난 고구려의 대중인식(對中認識)과 대외정책" 55 : 31-32,

      2 박시형, "광개토왕릉비" 사회과학원출판사 150-157, 1966

      3 서영일, "고구려의 백제 공격로 고찰" 38 : 2006

      4 공석구, "고구려와 모용 ‘연’의 전쟁과 그 의미" 동북아역사재단 (15) : 57-101, 2007

      5 "魏書"

      6 지배선, "高句麗와 鮮卑의 전쟁 -慕容?와 慕容?을 중심으로-" 고구려발해학회 24 : 71-88, 2006

      7 姜 仙, "高句麗와 北方民族의 관계 연구" 淑明女子大學校 2003

      8 李龍範, "韓滿交流史硏究" 同和出版公社 125-126, 1989

      9 "資治通鑑"

      10 신정훈, "百濟 枕流王·辰斯王代의 정국과 高句麗의 동향" 백산학회 90 (90): 159-183, 2011

      1 여호규, "광개토왕릉비 에 나타난 고구려의 대중인식(對中認識)과 대외정책" 55 : 31-32,

      2 박시형, "광개토왕릉비" 사회과학원출판사 150-157, 1966

      3 서영일, "고구려의 백제 공격로 고찰" 38 : 2006

      4 공석구, "고구려와 모용 ‘연’의 전쟁과 그 의미" 동북아역사재단 (15) : 57-101, 2007

      5 "魏書"

      6 지배선, "高句麗와 鮮卑의 전쟁 -慕容?와 慕容?을 중심으로-" 고구려발해학회 24 : 71-88, 2006

      7 姜 仙, "高句麗와 北方民族의 관계 연구" 淑明女子大學校 2003

      8 李龍範, "韓滿交流史硏究" 同和出版公社 125-126, 1989

      9 "資治通鑑"

      10 신정훈, "百濟 枕流王·辰斯王代의 정국과 高句麗의 동향" 백산학회 90 (90): 159-183, 2011

      11 "漢書"

      12 "晋書"

      13 "廣開土王陵碑"

      14 池培善, "中世東北亞史硏究" 一潮閣 231-356, 1986

      15 池培善, "中世 中國史 硏究" 연세대학교 출판부 21-95, 1998

      16 "三國史記"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-03-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.68 0.68 0.69
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.66 0.65 0.904 0.19
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼