RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      SCI SCIE SCOPUS

      Right hepatic vein stenosis at anastomosis in patients after living donor liver transplantation: optimal Doppler US venous pulsatility index and CT criteria--receiver operating characteristic analysis.

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      <P>PURPOSE: To establish optimal Doppler ultrasonographic (US) venous pulsatility index and computed tomographic (CT) criteria for right hepatic vein (RHV) stenosis after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and to compare accuracies of the...

      <P>PURPOSE: To establish optimal Doppler ultrasonographic (US) venous pulsatility index and computed tomographic (CT) criteria for right hepatic vein (RHV) stenosis after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and to compare accuracies of these methods by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by an institutional review board; informed consent was waived. Eighty patients (48 men, 32 women; mean age, 51.5 years +/- 9.2 [standard deviation]) underwent Doppler US and CT within 8 days of hepatic venography following right lobe LDLT between October 2006 and September 2008. At venography, RHVs were classified into a stenosis or nonstenosis group. At Doppler US, venous pulsatility index was defined as the difference between maximum and minimum frequency shifts divided by maximum frequency shift. At CT, diameters of anastomosis and RHV were measured; percentage of stenosis was calculated. Mean Doppler US and CT parameters in the two groups were compared; ROC analysis was performed. RESULTS: There were 30 stenotic and 50 nonstenotic RHVs. Mean venous pulsatility index and mean anastomosis diameter were significantly lower and mean percentage of stenosis was significantly higher in the stenosis than the nonstenosis group (P < .001 each). Optimal cutoffs for venous pulsatility index, anastomosis diameter, and percentage of stenosis were 0.16, 3.7 mm, and 47%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were 86.7% and 68.0% for venous pulsatility index, 96.7% and 88.0% for anastomosis diameter, and 96.7% and 86.0% for percentage of stenosis, respectively. At ROC analysis, anastomosis diameter (P = .002) and percentage of stenosis (P = .003) were significantly more accurate than venous pulsatility index. CONCLUSION: CT is more accurate than Doppler US for RHV stenosis after LDLT, with venous pulsatility index as the sole sonographic criterion. Patients suspected of having RHV stenosis at Doppler US may benefit from CT to reduce unnecessary venography.</P>

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼