지역거점 공공청사의 공간구성에 관한 연구 - 해외 사례를 중심으로 - = A Study on the Spatial Composition of the Government Buildings as a Regional Hub - Focus on the Foreign Cases -

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

As the information society has emerged, the public has enjoyed more active social participation, culture, and leisure and become interested in the use and management of public spaces and programs through which they can communicate. However, the government building has not flexibly coped with such demands and has been only used when necessary with its standardized spatial composition and programs.
In this study, we investigate the government buildings as regional hubs where information exchange and communication occur as well as public goods representing a region and conducting its administrative work where local residents can have pride. We aim to use the study results as the basic data for the spatial composition of the local government building.
The architectural expression of the regional hub can be realized through organic relations of spatial, visual, continuous, approach, empirical, organic, behavioral and perceptual expression. The excellent examples of the foreign government buildings as regional hubs classify programs as follows: publicity, local, and symbol programs. The spatial composition is divided into mutual exchange space, public support space, educational information space, and activity space.
Layout the government buildings are classified as follows based on entrance to the government buildings and public communication space: courtyard type, integrated type, separate type, and contact type. Plans are classified as follows based on the bottom shape and function of the lower layer: distributed type, central type, and eccentric type. Façades are classified as follows based on the relations with the surrounding and material properties and composition: pattern types and regional-adaptation types. Sections are classified as follows based on spatial composition type: atrium type, aisle type, square type, and hybrid type.
The government offices as regional hubs should be open space that reflects the cultural and historical characteristics of regions. They should promote voluntary citizen participation through differentiated space and programs and change from non-daily places to daily places.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김상경, "환경-행위연구와 건축, 도시설계의 방향" 대한건축학회 29 (29): 1985

2 이슬기, "지역커뮤니티 활성화를 위한 복합용도공간 디자인에 관한 연구" 한국공간디자인학회 3 (3): 2008

3 전석환, "장소의 역사 지리적 탐색을 통한 건축적 재현 과정에 대한 연구 : 팔림프레스트의 개념적 유추를 통한 장소의 재사회화를 중심으로" 인하대학교 대학원 2014

4 권영재, "장소기억을 활용한 공공적 장소성 구축에 관한 연구" 한국공간디자인학회 11 (11): 2016

5 박항섭, "일본 공공청사의 지역거점 공간 표현에관한 연구" (56) : 2016

6 고정수, "유기적 도시건축의 해석에 관한 연구" 21 (21): 2001

7 우준형, "도시 이미지 속의 Figure&Ground 이론을 바탕으로 한 공공 공간계획에 관한 연구" 28 (28): 2008

8 Christian Norberg-Schultz, "근대건축의 근원 : 공간예술사" 1991

9 William. J. R. Curtis, "근대건축과 그 계승 : 건축문화" 1989

10 김예진, "경험디자인의 개념과 특성에 관한 연구" 16 (16): 2006

11 Jurgen Joedick, "건축의 법칙 : 미건사" 1995

12 "新建築, 2016.4 / 2015.12 / 2012.7"

13 "www.archdaily.com"

14 Alex Wall, "Programming the Urban Surface" Princeton 1999