RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      국내 대학기록물의 관리체계에 대한 실증적 연구 : 기구 및 수집과 이용을 중심으로 = (An) Empirical Study on the Management System of the University Archives in Korean : Focusing on Organization, Collection, and Utilization

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9355367

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In the midst of rapid social changes such as informatization and globalization, universities are in more urgent need of competition for adaptation to and survival in a new environment than any other organization. One of the responsibilities new environmental changes call on universities to assume is the establishment of university archives. The importance of the university archives lies in its primary function as historical evidence that can prove the existence of the universities and the reason of their existence.
      The purpose of this study is to examine the level of universities in Korea to fulfilling the new responsibility of administering university archives programs by surveying the university archives in Korea and analyzing them. The results of this study show that the overall standard of the archival management system falls short of the standard and the management system is not consistent with the actual circumstances of each university. The specific details about the current situation of the management of archives in universities in Korea and suggestions for future improvement are as follows.
      First, the total number of universities that manage university archives amounts to 45; among them, 18 universities or 39.13percent are national or public, and 27 universities or 15.25percent private.
      Second, most universities started managing their archival holdings after 1999 when the law related was enacted and national and public universities in particular were heavily influenced by the enactment of the law.
      Third, it is critical for the university archives to establish itself as an independent organization with identity in drawing up long-term visions of the university and comprehensive plans. Unfortunately, however, university archives in most universities in Korea tend to be affiliated to the offices in charge of existing related programs.
      Fourth, the titles of the archives in charge of managing university record is not consistent and the titles the offices are referred to as do not manifest their autonomous functions in managing university records and archives.
      Fifth, the collection of university records does not transcend the scope of its archival holdings, which calls for more active and aggressive measures to collect materials through the cooperative system with other universities.
      Sixth, each university should collect university records through an active publicity campaign on the one hand and build a cooperative system with other universities and endeavor to collect university records in partnership with other universities on the other.
      Seventh, as the arrangement of professional manpower for the management of records falls short of any reasonable standard, it is difficult to expect their independent right and role in evaluating records and administering the whole managing system.
      Finally, the utilization of preserved records in each university is limited to the exhibition of them and the publication of periodical journals. It is necessary to find various ways to utilize collected materials and expand sound usage of them as historical evidence and a means to publicize the university.
      As the results of the study clearly show, what is at stake in the current circumstances in managing university archival holdings in Korea is to find solutions to improve the current poor management of university archival holdings in the future. Above all, it requires support at the governmental level rather than relying entirely on the internal awareness and effort of the universities themselves.
      번역하기

      In the midst of rapid social changes such as informatization and globalization, universities are in more urgent need of competition for adaptation to and survival in a new environment than any other organization. One of the responsibilities new enviro...

      In the midst of rapid social changes such as informatization and globalization, universities are in more urgent need of competition for adaptation to and survival in a new environment than any other organization. One of the responsibilities new environmental changes call on universities to assume is the establishment of university archives. The importance of the university archives lies in its primary function as historical evidence that can prove the existence of the universities and the reason of their existence.
      The purpose of this study is to examine the level of universities in Korea to fulfilling the new responsibility of administering university archives programs by surveying the university archives in Korea and analyzing them. The results of this study show that the overall standard of the archival management system falls short of the standard and the management system is not consistent with the actual circumstances of each university. The specific details about the current situation of the management of archives in universities in Korea and suggestions for future improvement are as follows.
      First, the total number of universities that manage university archives amounts to 45; among them, 18 universities or 39.13percent are national or public, and 27 universities or 15.25percent private.
      Second, most universities started managing their archival holdings after 1999 when the law related was enacted and national and public universities in particular were heavily influenced by the enactment of the law.
      Third, it is critical for the university archives to establish itself as an independent organization with identity in drawing up long-term visions of the university and comprehensive plans. Unfortunately, however, university archives in most universities in Korea tend to be affiliated to the offices in charge of existing related programs.
      Fourth, the titles of the archives in charge of managing university record is not consistent and the titles the offices are referred to as do not manifest their autonomous functions in managing university records and archives.
      Fifth, the collection of university records does not transcend the scope of its archival holdings, which calls for more active and aggressive measures to collect materials through the cooperative system with other universities.
      Sixth, each university should collect university records through an active publicity campaign on the one hand and build a cooperative system with other universities and endeavor to collect university records in partnership with other universities on the other.
      Seventh, as the arrangement of professional manpower for the management of records falls short of any reasonable standard, it is difficult to expect their independent right and role in evaluating records and administering the whole managing system.
      Finally, the utilization of preserved records in each university is limited to the exhibition of them and the publication of periodical journals. It is necessary to find various ways to utilize collected materials and expand sound usage of them as historical evidence and a means to publicize the university.
      As the results of the study clearly show, what is at stake in the current circumstances in managing university archival holdings in Korea is to find solutions to improve the current poor management of university archival holdings in the future. Above all, it requires support at the governmental level rather than relying entirely on the internal awareness and effort of the universities themselves.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차 = ⅰ
      • 1. 서론 = 1
      • 1.1. 연구목적 = 1
      • 1.2. 연구의 범위와 방법 = 3
      • 1.3. 선행연구 = 4
      • 목차 = ⅰ
      • 1. 서론 = 1
      • 1.1. 연구목적 = 1
      • 1.2. 연구의 범위와 방법 = 3
      • 1.3. 선행연구 = 4
      • 2. 대학기록물 보존관리의 이론적 고찰 = 8
      • 2.1. 기록물의 정의와 종류 = 8
      • 2.1.1. 기록물의 정의 = 8
      • 2.1.2. 기록물의 종류 = 9
      • 2.2. 대학기록물의 범위와 가치 = 10
      • 2.2.1. 대학기록물의 범위 = 10
      • 2.2.2. 대학기록물의 가치 = 12
      • 2.3. 대학기록물의 보존역사 및 관리체계 = 14
      • 2.3.1. 대학기록물의 보존역사 = 16
      • 2.3.2. 대학기록물의 관리 체계 = 20
      • 3. 국내 대학기록물 관리의 현황 분석 = 37
      • 3.1. 조사의 진행 = 37
      • 3.2. 조사의 결과 = 38
      • 3.2.1. 대학기록물의 관리기구 현황 = 39
      • 3.2.1.1. 대학기록물 관리기구의 설치 현황 = 39
      • 3.2.1.2. 대학설립 유형별 현황 = 41
      • 3.2.1.3. 대학기록물 관리기구의 명칭별 현황 = 43
      • 3.2.1.4. 대학기록물 관리기구의 소속별 현황 = 44
      • 3.2.1.5. 대학기록물 관리기구의 설립연도별 현황 = 46
      • 3.2.1.6. 대학기록물 관리기구의 규정 보유 현황 = 48
      • 3.2.2. 대학기록물의 관리체계 현황 = 50
      • 3.2.2.1. 전문인력의 배치 현황 = 50
      • 3.2.2.2. 대학기록물 수집 현황 = 52
      • 3.2.2.3. 기록물의 분류체계 현황 = 56
      • 3.2.2.4. 기록물의 이용 현황 = 59
      • 3.2.2.5. 대학기록물보존소의 활동 = 66
      • 4. 결론 및 제언 = 68
      • 4.1. 조사결과의 요약 = 68
      • 4.2. 대학기록물 관리업무를 위한 제언 = 70
      • 참고문헌 = 72
      • Abstract = 75
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼