RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      정보기술역량과 조직학습이 기업성과에 미치는 영향 = 조직민첩성의 역할을 중심으로

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100856855

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Current business environments are increasingly hyper-competitive and rapidly changing due to globalization and the advancement of information and communication technologies. In order to identify opportunities and threats from such turbulent environmen...

      Current business environments are increasingly hyper-competitive and rapidly changing due to globalization and the advancement of information and communication technologies. In order to identify opportunities and threats from such turbulent environments and respond to them appropriately, many companies are putting effort into developing dynamic capabilities. Organizational agility, as a type of dynamic capability of an organization that helps companies rapidly adapt to dynamic environment, plays an important role in sustaining competitive advantage and enhancing organizational performance. Despite the importance of organizational agility, however, there has been little empirical research on its antecedents and impacts. Based on the dynamic capability theory, this study proposes a theoretical research model that explains formation and consequence of organizational agility and tests it empirically. We propose information technology competency and organizational learning as formation factors of organizational agility, while suggesting organizational performance as its consequence factor. With this motivation, this study has three research objectives. First, this study proposes a role of dynamic capability that organizations can use to appropriately respond to changing business environments. In particular, we conceptualize organizational agility as being one of the most important dynamic capabilities of organizations and examine its role in an organizational setting. Second, this study introduces and tests a theoretical model accounting for the relationships among information technology competency, organizational learning, organizational agility, and organizational performance. In addition, this study examines a mediating role of organizational agility between its antecedents and organizational performance. Third, we aim to provide insights on how to create and improve organizational agility by analyzing the research findings. This suggests the direction for the management on how to deploy organizational resources. In order to test the proposed model, the overall approach employed was a field study using the structural equation model. We developed our data collection instrument by adopting existing validated questions wherever possible. Organization-level samples collected from 84 companies were used to empirically examine the proposed research model. We carried out data analysis using a twostep methodology with LISREL 8.7. The first step in the data analysis was to establish the convergent and discriminant validity of the constructs. In the second step, we examined the structural model based on the cleansed measurement model. The empirical results supported the proposed model and identified the mediation role of organizational agility. As a result of the analysis, the following findings were discussed. First, information technology competency significantly influenced both organizational agility and organizational learning. Second, it was revealed that organizational learning significantly influenced organizational agility. Third, organizational agility was found to have an impact on organizational performance. In conclusion, the theoretical and practical implications of this study were discussed, along with its limitations.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 곽기영, "기반 조직민첩성이 기업성과에 미치는 영향: 동적역량이론 관점" 2010

      2 Kalakota, R, "e-business 2.0: Roadmap for Success" Addison-Wesley 2001

      3 Thomas, J., "Understanding Strategic Learning: Linking Organizational Learning, Knowledge Management, and Sensemaking" 12 (12): 331-345, 2001

      4 Nevis, E. C., "Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems" 36 : 73-85, 1995

      5 Taylor, S, "Understanding Information technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models" 6 (6): 144-176, 1995

      6 Cronin,M, "Unchained Value: The New Logic of Digital Business" Harvard Business School Press 2000

      7 Makadok,R, "Towards a Synthesis of the Resource-Based and Dynamic-Capability Views of Rent Creation" 22 (22): 387-401, 2001

      8 Dickson,P, "Toward a General Theory of Competitive Rationality" 56 (56): 69-83, 1992

      9 Schein,E, "Three Culture of Management: The Key to Organizational Learning" 38 (38): 9-20, 1996

      10 Nastanski,M, "The Value of Active Scanning to Senior Executives" 23 (23): 426-436, 2004

      1 곽기영, "기반 조직민첩성이 기업성과에 미치는 영향: 동적역량이론 관점" 2010

      2 Kalakota, R, "e-business 2.0: Roadmap for Success" Addison-Wesley 2001

      3 Thomas, J., "Understanding Strategic Learning: Linking Organizational Learning, Knowledge Management, and Sensemaking" 12 (12): 331-345, 2001

      4 Nevis, E. C., "Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems" 36 : 73-85, 1995

      5 Taylor, S, "Understanding Information technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models" 6 (6): 144-176, 1995

      6 Cronin,M, "Unchained Value: The New Logic of Digital Business" Harvard Business School Press 2000

      7 Makadok,R, "Towards a Synthesis of the Resource-Based and Dynamic-Capability Views of Rent Creation" 22 (22): 387-401, 2001

      8 Dickson,P, "Toward a General Theory of Competitive Rationality" 56 (56): 69-83, 1992

      9 Schein,E, "Three Culture of Management: The Key to Organizational Learning" 38 (38): 9-20, 1996

      10 Nastanski,M, "The Value of Active Scanning to Senior Executives" 23 (23): 426-436, 2004

      11 Daniel, E. M, "The Role of Dynamic Capabilities in e-business Transformation" 12 : 282-296, 2003

      12 Grant,R, "The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage" 33 (33): 114-135, 1991

      13 Li, T., "The Relationships between Market-Driven Learning and New Product Success in Export Markets" 16 (16): 476-503, 1999

      14 Bettis, R, "The New Competitive Landscape" 16 : 7-19, 1995

      15 Levinthal, D, "The Myopia of Learning" 14 : 95-112, 1993

      16 Senge,P, "The Fifth Discipline" Doubleday 1990

      17 Atuahene-Gima, K., "The Contingent Value of Responsive and Proactive Market Orientations for New Product Program Performance" 22 : 464-482, 2005

      18 Brown, S, "The Art Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations" 42 (42): 1-34, 1997

      19 Christopher, M, "Supply Chain Migration from Lean and Functional to Agile and Customized" 5 (5): 206-213, 2000

      20 Anderson, J. C., "Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach" 103 (103): 411-423, 1988

      21 Gefen, D., "Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice" 4 : 1-70, 2000

      22 Venkatraman,N, "Strategic Orientation of Business Enterprises" 35 (35): 942-962, 1989

      23 Ansoff,H.I, "Strategic Issue Management" 2 (2): 32-148, 1980

      24 Amit, R, "Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent" 13 (13): 33-46, 1993

      25 Sambamurthy, V., "Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms" 27 (27): 237-263, 2003

      26 Bradly, S. P, "Sense and Respond: Capturing Value in the Network Era" Harvard Business School Press 1998

      27 Narver, J., "Responsive and Proactive Market Orientation and New-Product Success" 21 : 334-347, 2004

      28 Dove,R, "Response Ability: The Language, Structure, and Culture of the Agile Enterprise" John Wiley and Sons 2001

      29 Sampler,J, "Redefining Industry Structure for the Information Age" 19 : 343-355, 1998

      30 Fichman,R, "Real Options and IT Platform Adoption; Implications for Theory and Practice" 2 (2): 132-154, 2004

      31 Rao,M, "Overview: The Social Life of KM Tools, in Knowledge Management Tools and Techniques: Practitioners and Experts Evaluate KM Solutions" Butterworth-Heinimann 1-73, 2004

      32 Huber,G.P, "Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures" 2 (2): 99-115, 1991

      33 Brodtrick,O, "Organizational Learning and Innovation: Tools for Revitalizing Public Services" 64 (64): 83-96, 1998

      34 Therin, F, "Organizational Learning and Innovation in High-Tech Small Firms" 2003

      35 Andreu, R, "Organizational Learning and Core Capabilities Development: The Role of IT" 5 : 111-127, 1996

      36 Yeung, A., "Organizational Learning Capability: Generating and Generalizing Ideas with Impact" Oxford University Press 1999

      37 Fiol, C, "Organizational Learning" 10 (10): 806-813, 1985

      38 Moorman, C, "Organizational Improvisation and Organizational Memory" 23 (23): 698-723, 1997

      39 Malhotra,Y, "Organizational Controls as Enablers and Constraints in Successful Knowledge Management Systems Implementation in Knowledge management and Business Model Innovation" Idea Group Publishing 326-336, 2001

      40 Kusunoki, K., "Organizational Capabilities in Product Development of Japanese Firms: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Findings" 9 (9): 699-718, 1998

      41 Collis,D.J, "Organization Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice" 6 : 1-22, 1994

      42 Wheeler,B.C, "NEBIC: A Dynamic Capabilities Theory for Assessing Net-Enablement" 13 (13): 125-146, 2002

      43 Hair, J. T., "Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed" Prentice Hall 1-730, 1998

      44 Lindblom, A., "Market-Sensing Capability and Business Performance of Retail Entrepreneurs" 4 (4): 219-236, 2008

      45 Kohli, A, "Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications" 54 : 1-18, 1990

      46 Slaster, S, "Market Orientation and the Learning Organization" 59 (59): 63-74, 1995

      47 Maltz, E, "Market Intelligent Dissemination across Functional Boundaries" 33 : 47-61, 1996

      48 Sinkula,J, "Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning" 58 (58): 35-45, 1994

      49 Day,G, "Managing the Market Learning Process" 17 (17): 240-252, 2002

      50 Broadbent, M, "Management by Maxim: How business and IT managers can create IT Infrastructures" 38 (38): 77-92, 1997

      51 Meyers, P. W, "Learning in New Technology Development Teams" 7 : 79-88, 1989

      52 Handzic,M, "Knowledge Management: Through the Technology Class" World Scientific Publishing 2004

      53 Dove,R, "Knowledge Management, Response Ability, and the Agile Enterprise" 3 (3): 18-35, 1999

      54 Santhanam, R, "Issues in Linking Information Technology Capability to Firm Performance" 27 (27): 125-153, 2003

      55 Barney,J, "Is the Resource-based View a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes" 26 (26): 41-56, 2001

      56 McAfee, A, "Investing in the IT That Makes a Competitive Difference" 99-107, 2008

      57 Kohli,R, "Innovating to Create IT-Based New Business Opportunities at United Parcel Service" 6 (6): 199-210, 2007

      58 Powell, T. C, "Information Technology as Competitive Advan tage: The Role of Human, Business, and Technology Resource" 18 (18): 375-405, 1997

      59 Mata, F. J., "Information Technology and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Resource- Based Analysis" 19 (19): 487-505, 1995

      60 Cooper, R. B, "Information Technology Development Creativity: A Case Study of Attempted Radical Change" 24 (24): 245-276,

      61 King, A. A, "Incumbent Entry into New Market Niches: The Role of Experience and Managerial Choice in the Creation" 48 (48): 171-186, 2002

      62 Piccoli, G, "IT-Dependent Strategic Initiatives and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature" 29 (29): 747-776, 2005

      63 Tippins, M, "IT Competency and Firm Performance: IS Organizational Learning A Missing Link" 24 (24): 754-760, 2003

      64 Rackoff, N., "IS is for Competitive Advantage: Implementation of a Planning Process" 9 : 285-294, 1985

      65 Cash, J, "IS Redraws Competitive Boundaries" 63 (63): 134-142, 1985

      66 Williams,J, "How Sustainable is Your Competitive Advantage" 34 : 29-51, 1992

      67 Hedberg,B, "How Organizations Learn and Unlearn, In Handbook of Organizational Design" Oxford University Press 3-27, 1981

      68 Porter, M, "How Information Technology Gives You Competitive Advantage" 63 (63): 149-160, 1985

      69 Pavlou, P. A, "From IT Leveraging Competence to Competitive Advantage in Turbulent Environments: The Case of New Product Development" 17 (17): 198-227, 2006

      70 McQuarrie, E, "Focus Groups and the Development of New Products: Some Guidelines" 3 : 40-47, 1986

      71 Barney,J, "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage" 17 (17): 99-120, 1991

      72 Weerawardena,J, "Exploring the Role of Market Learning Capability in Competitive Strategy" 37 (37): 407-429, 2003

      73 March,J, "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning" 2 (2): 71-87, 1991

      74 Vandenbosch, B, "Executive Support Systems and Learning: A Model and Empirical Test" 12 (12): 99-130, 1995

      75 Fornell, C, "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error" 40 : 440-465, 1981

      76 Hambrick,C, "Environmental Scanning and Organizational Strategy" 3 : 159-174, 1982

      77 Dollinger,M.J, "Environmental Boundary Spanning and Information Processing Effects on Organizational Performance" 27 (27): 351-368, 1984

      78 Dess, G, "Environment, Structure, and Consensus in Strategy Formulation: A Conceptual Integration" 12 (12): 313-330, 1987

      79 Overby, E., "Enterprise Agility and the Enabling Role of Informational Technology" 15 : 120-131, 2006

      80 Eisenhardt, K, "Dynamic Capabilities: What are they" 21 (21): 1105-1121, 2000

      81 Ambrosini, V, "Dynamic Capabilities: An Exploration of How Firms Renew Their Resource Base" 20 (20): S9-S24, 2009

      82 Teece, D. J., "Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management" 18 (18): 509-533, 1997

      83 Tapscott, D, "Digital Capital: Harnessing Power of Business Webs" Harvard Business School Press 2000

      84 Ross, J., "Develop Long-Term Competitiveness through IT Assets" 38 (38): 31-42, 1996

      85 Zollo, M, "Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities" 13 : 339-351, 2002

      86 Treacy, M, "Customer Intimacy and Other Value Disciplines" 71 (71): 84-93, 1993

      87 Porter,M, "Competitive advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance" Free Press 1985

      88 Daft, R., "Chief Executive Scanning, Environmental Characteristic, and Company Performance: An Empirical Study" 9 : 123-139, 1988

      89 Van Oosterhout, M., "Change Factors Requiring Agility and Implications for IT" 15 : 132-145, 2006

      90 Grewal, R, "Building Organizational Capabilities for Managing Economic Crisis: the Role of Market Orientation and Strategic Flexibility" 2 (2): 67-80, 2001

      91 Weill, P., "Building IT Infrastructure for Strategic Agility" 44 (44): 57-65, 2002

      92 Sarkis,J, "Benchmarking for Agility" 8 (8): 88-107, 2001

      93 Hiltz, S, "Asynchronous Learning Network as Virtual Classroom" 40 (40): 44-49, 1997

      94 Bagozzi, R.P., "Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research" 36 : 99-120, 1991

      95 Chau,P.Y.K, "An Empirical Investigation on Factors Affecting the Acceptance of CASE by Systems Developers" 30 : 269-280, 1996

      96 Jackson, M, "An Agility Analysis from a Production System Perspective" 14 (14): 482-488, 2003

      97 Katayama, H, "Agility, Adaptability and Leanness: A Comparison of Concepts and a Study of Practice" 60 : 43-51, 1999

      98 Ramasesh, R., "Agility in Manufacturing Systems: an Exploratory Modeling Framework and Simulation" 12 (12): 534-548, 2001

      99 Vázquez-Bustelo, D., "Agility Drivers, Enablers and Outcomes: Empirical Test of an Integrated Agile Manufacturing Model" 27 (27): 1303-1332, 2007

      100 Yusuf, Y. Y, "Agile Supply Chain Capabilities: Determinants of Competitive Objectives" 159 : 379-392, 2004

      101 Kidd,P.T, "Agile Manufacturing: Forging New Frontiers" Addison-Wesley 1995

      102 Sharifi, H, "Agile Manufacturing in Practice Application of Methodology" 21 (21): 772-794, 2001

      103 Goldman, S. L., "Agile Competitors and Virtual Organizations: Strategies for Enriching the Customer" Van Nostrand Reinhold 1995

      104 Zahra, S, "Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization and Extension" 27 (27): 185-203, 2002

      105 Cohen, W. M, "Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation" 1 (1): 128-152, 1990

      106 Bharadwaj,A, "A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation" 24 (24): 169-196, 2000

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼