RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      Processing NPIs in Korean = ERP Evidence for Their Differences

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105033229

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper used the neuro-linguistic, event-related potential (ERP) experimental methodology to investigate the sentence processing of the two negative polarity items (NPIs) in Korean such as amwu+N+to ‘any + N’ and te isang ‘any longer/further.’Our starting point is the descriptive and theoretical analyses of the two NPIs at issue. They are established as NPIs that require a licensing element for their distribution within a sentence, but they differ in terms of the type of licensing elements. Manipulating the structural environments, we recorded the neural responses to the verbal complexes that can or cannot license the NPIs. We found that, first, N400 was evoked by both of the NPIs in the illegal environments like a positive clause. Since N400 is regarded as a neural index of incomplete semantic integration, it follows that the Korean NPIs’ licensee-licensor relation is resolved via semantic processes. Second, amwu+N+to–containing question and -ki cen-ey ‘before’clauses as well as positive clauses elicited N400, whereas te isang–containing question and -ki cen-ey ‘before’ clauses elicited anterior P600. We take the latter anterior P600 component to reflect not a violation of NPI licensing but a cognitive load of discourse/pragmatic processing due to the lexical meaning of te isang. Third, directly comparing the two NPIs in terms of neural profiles, we find that amwu+N+to undergoes a full gamut of semantic retrieval and integration, thus cognitively more demanding than te isang in the course of their processing.
      번역하기

      This paper used the neuro-linguistic, event-related potential (ERP) experimental methodology to investigate the sentence processing of the two negative polarity items (NPIs) in Korean such as amwu+N+to ‘any + N’ and te isang ‘any longer/further....

      This paper used the neuro-linguistic, event-related potential (ERP) experimental methodology to investigate the sentence processing of the two negative polarity items (NPIs) in Korean such as amwu+N+to ‘any + N’ and te isang ‘any longer/further.’Our starting point is the descriptive and theoretical analyses of the two NPIs at issue. They are established as NPIs that require a licensing element for their distribution within a sentence, but they differ in terms of the type of licensing elements. Manipulating the structural environments, we recorded the neural responses to the verbal complexes that can or cannot license the NPIs. We found that, first, N400 was evoked by both of the NPIs in the illegal environments like a positive clause. Since N400 is regarded as a neural index of incomplete semantic integration, it follows that the Korean NPIs’ licensee-licensor relation is resolved via semantic processes. Second, amwu+N+to–containing question and -ki cen-ey ‘before’clauses as well as positive clauses elicited N400, whereas te isang–containing question and -ki cen-ey ‘before’ clauses elicited anterior P600. We take the latter anterior P600 component to reflect not a violation of NPI licensing but a cognitive load of discourse/pragmatic processing due to the lexical meaning of te isang. Third, directly comparing the two NPIs in terms of neural profiles, we find that amwu+N+to undergoes a full gamut of semantic retrieval and integration, thus cognitively more demanding than te isang in the course of their processing.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. Introduction
      • 2. Experiment
      • 3. Discussion and Conclusion
      • Reference
      • 1. Introduction
      • 2. Experiment
      • 3. Discussion and Conclusion
      • Reference
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼