Microwave Assisted Extraction, Optimization using Central Composite Design, Quantitative Estimation of Arjunic Acid and Arjunolic Acid using HPTLC and Evaluation of Radical Scavenging Potential of Stem Bark of Terminalia arjuna

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The optimization and microwave assisted extraction of stem bark of Terminalia arjuna, quantitative estimation of the marker compounds arjunic acid and arjunolic acid using HPTLC and the evaluation of free radical scavenging activity has been performed in this study. The central composite design was used for optimization and the values of parameters for optimized batch of microwave assisted extraction were 1000 W (Power), 3 minutes (Time) and 1/120 (Solid/solvent ratio). The solvent system to carry out the HPTLC was toluene: acetic acid: ethyl acetate (5: 5: 0.5) and quantitative estimation was done using standard equations obtained from the marker compounds. The in-vitro free radical scavenging activity was performed spectrophotometrically using ascorbic acid as standard. The value of estimated percentage yield of arjunic acid and arjunolic acid was 1.42% and 1.52% which upon experimentation was obtained as 1.38% and 1.51% respectively. The DPPH assay of the different batches of microwave assisted extraction and marker compounds taken suggested that the marker compounds arjunic acid and the arjunolic acid were responsible for the free radical scavenging activity as the batch having the maximum percentage yield of the marker compounds showed best free radical scavenging effect as compared to standard ascorbic acid. The IC50 value of the optimized batch was found to be 24.72 while that of the standard ascorbic acid was 29.83. Hence, the yield of arjunic acid and arjunolic acid has direct correlation with the free radical scavenging activity of stem bark extract of Terminalia arjuna and have potential to serve as active lead compounds for free radical scavenging activity.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Fang, Y, 8 : 033103-, 2016

2 Puthur, J. T., 2 : 14-17, 2016

3 Martinez-Valverde, I, 82 : 323-330, 2002

4 Duthie, G. G, 13 : 79-106, 2000

5 Halder, S, 47 : 577-583, 2009

6 Chaudhari, M., 20 : 799-805, 2006

7 Chatha, S. A. S, 5 : 298-, 2014

8 Bachaya, H. A, 11 : 273-278, 2009

9 Sultana, B, 104 : 1106-1114, 2007

10 Manna, P, 82 : 137-149, 2008

11 Elsherbiny, N. M, 77 : 26-34, 2016

12 Sumitra, M, 224 : 135-142, 2001

13 Sun, F. Y, 36 : 197-207, 2008

14 Galano, A, 7 : 335-352, 2016

15 Choi, S, 30 : 1174-1175, 2016

16 Bondet, V, 30 : 609-615, 1997

17 Novilla, A, 39 : 224-233, 2014

18 Sasidharan, S, 8 : 1-4, 2011

19 Rufino, M. S. M, 121 : 996-1002, 2010

20 Bandaranayake, W. M., 10 : 421-452, 2002

21 Vlachojannis, J, 25 : 1102-1104, 2011

22 Staba, E. J, 20 : 2495-2498, 1981

23 Aslam, J, 119 : 325-329, 2009

24 Xie, P, 1112 : 171-180, 2006

25 Pozharitskaya, O. N, 30 : 1250-1254, 2007

26 Pirisi, F. M, 48 : 1191-1196, 2000

27 de la Torre-Carbot, K, 53 : 4331-4340, 2005

28 Daferera, D. J, 48 : 2576-2581, 2000

29 Akowuah, G. A, 19 : 118-126, 2006

30 Mallavadhani, U. V, 40 : 508-511, 2002

31 Khatoon, S, 18 : 364-367, 2005

32 Kumar, A, 3 : 63-68, 2010

33 Pereira, C. A, 15 : 241-248, 2004

34 Mehta, M, 12 : 91-95, 2001

35 Hawthorne, S. B, 892 : 421-433, 2000

36 De Castro, M. D. L, 369 : 1-10, 1998

37 Huddleston, J. G, 16 : 1765-1766, 1998

38 Khan, M. K, 119 : 851-858, 2010

39 Dai, J, 15 : 7313-7352, 2010

40 Núñez Sellés, A. J, 50 : 762-766, 2002

41 Pourmortazavi, S. M, 1163 : 2-24, 2007

42 Routray, W, 5 : 409-424, 2012

43 Kaufmann, B, 13 : 105-113, 2002

44 Lu, Y, 1208 : 42-46, 2008

45 Spigno, G, 93 : 210-217, 2009

46 Devgan, M, 26 : 973-976, 2013

47 Devgun, M, 69 : 475-485, 2012

48 Devgun, M, 3 : 644-649, 2010

49 Valko, M, 90 : 1-37, 2016

50 Przyklenk, K, 64 : 86-96, 1989

51 Prasad, K, 125 : 958-973, 1993

52 Pharmacopoeia of India, "Herbs and Herbal Monographs: Indian Pharmacopoeial Commission"