RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      부산항 일본인 거류지의 설치와 형성 = 개항 초기를 중심으로

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99746239

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The fourth provision of the <Japanese-Korea Treaty of Amity(Treaty of Ganghwa)>, established in February, 1876, and the <Lease contract of the concession in Pusan Port> agreed in the following January changed ‘Waegwan’ into Japanese ‘concession’.
      The admittance of the Chosun Dynasty to found the Japanese ‘concession’ was explainable, since ‘Waegwan’, from the end of the Chosun Dynasty, has been a specialized district where trade and diplomatic affairs between the Dynasty and the Tsushima Han took place. Waegwan, although first established in the fifteenth-century, had been in an unstable state until sometime after the Japanese invasion of Korea in 1592, when the national relationship between the two was recovered: it then was reestablished in the beginning of 1678 and became the centrepoint of their interrelationship. The Chosun Dynasty successfully maximized the utility of the district by guarding and restricting the officials from Tsushima Han and the Japanese overseas’ traders.
      When one scrutinizes and compares the idea and the policy of the two countries about the ‘concession’, it could be detected that Chosun had taken i t as a revival of an ol d tradition, but Japan had had a modern concept for it. The negotiations made in the <Japanese-Korea Treaty of Amity> and the <Lease contract of the concession in Pusan Port> well demonstrate the difference. Through these contracts, Chosun tried to limit the Japanese merchants within the restricted area as before, but Japan acquired advantageous trade policies in the whole Dongraebu, by convincing the Chosun government or making use of its ignorance.
      After the establishment, Pusan concession developed into an ‘Japanese town’ which one could almost call a Japanese district. It became a Japanese trade and residential area, where the Japanese could manage and develop the estate, and even self-govern. However, a large Japanese population in the area was still from Tsushima, for only those from Tsushima could trade in the old Choryanghang concession, and the same people continued to cross the sea after the reform. They worked as commission agents of big merchants, the long enterprise with Chosun merchants from the period of the old concession. It seems clear that despite the modern characteristics of the new Choryanghang concession, it still contained pre-modern features of the old times.
      번역하기

      The fourth provision of the <Japanese-Korea Treaty of Amity(Treaty of Ganghwa)>, established in February, 1876, and the <Lease contract of the concession in Pusan Port> agreed in the following January changed ‘Waegwan’ into Japanese ...

      The fourth provision of the <Japanese-Korea Treaty of Amity(Treaty of Ganghwa)>, established in February, 1876, and the <Lease contract of the concession in Pusan Port> agreed in the following January changed ‘Waegwan’ into Japanese ‘concession’.
      The admittance of the Chosun Dynasty to found the Japanese ‘concession’ was explainable, since ‘Waegwan’, from the end of the Chosun Dynasty, has been a specialized district where trade and diplomatic affairs between the Dynasty and the Tsushima Han took place. Waegwan, although first established in the fifteenth-century, had been in an unstable state until sometime after the Japanese invasion of Korea in 1592, when the national relationship between the two was recovered: it then was reestablished in the beginning of 1678 and became the centrepoint of their interrelationship. The Chosun Dynasty successfully maximized the utility of the district by guarding and restricting the officials from Tsushima Han and the Japanese overseas’ traders.
      When one scrutinizes and compares the idea and the policy of the two countries about the ‘concession’, it could be detected that Chosun had taken i t as a revival of an ol d tradition, but Japan had had a modern concept for it. The negotiations made in the <Japanese-Korea Treaty of Amity> and the <Lease contract of the concession in Pusan Port> well demonstrate the difference. Through these contracts, Chosun tried to limit the Japanese merchants within the restricted area as before, but Japan acquired advantageous trade policies in the whole Dongraebu, by convincing the Chosun government or making use of its ignorance.
      After the establishment, Pusan concession developed into an ‘Japanese town’ which one could almost call a Japanese district. It became a Japanese trade and residential area, where the Japanese could manage and develop the estate, and even self-govern. However, a large Japanese population in the area was still from Tsushima, for only those from Tsushima could trade in the old Choryanghang concession, and the same people continued to cross the sea after the reform. They worked as commission agents of big merchants, the long enterprise with Chosun merchants from the period of the old concession. It seems clear that despite the modern characteristics of the new Choryanghang concession, it still contained pre-modern features of the old times.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 거류지에 대한 양국의 인식과 정책
      • Ⅲ. 거류지 형성과 초기 주민구성
      • Ⅳ. 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 거류지에 대한 양국의 인식과 정책
      • Ⅲ. 거류지 형성과 초기 주민구성
      • Ⅳ. 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼