Golryeonggol, l oc ated i n southeastern Daejeon n ear Okc heon a nd Geumsan, is the site of a civilian massacre during the Korean War. In 1950, following the war’s outbreak, South Korean military and police forces executed prisoners from the Daejeo...
Golryeonggol, l oc ated i n southeastern Daejeon n ear Okc heon a nd Geumsan, is the site of a civilian massacre during the Korean War. In 1950, following the war’s outbreak, South Korean military and police forces executed prisoners from the Daejeon Prison, members of the National Security and Directive League, and those suspected of collaborating with the People’s Army. In the late 1990s with the conclusion of the Cold War, local civil society groups and organizations representing bereaved family members initiated campaigns to uncover the truth. T hese e fforts led t o five e xc avations whic h took plac e between 2007 and 2022, uncovering the remains of over 1,400 victims.
In this paper I critique the manner of the exhumations and the operation of the historical fact-finding movement at Golyeonggol, by focusing on the materiality of the victims’ remains. I argue that these remains should not be seen as fixed entities, but as materials embodying fluidity and complexity. In the context of the discovery and preservation of the burial sites, the repeated exhumations, and the circumstances that followed, the victims’ remains are viewed both as sacred figures—symbolically “fathers and mothers”—and as unstable materials that blur the line between human and non-human. This instability creates tensions in the evolving expectations of bereaved families, civil society, and the external performance of the fact-finding movement at Golryeonggol. By recalling the material conditions of the remains and the gaps in memory politics at Golryeonggol, I argue that exhumations and fact-finding movements at Golryeonggol and other civilian massacre sites should be approached with greater reflection in the future.