RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCIE

      Reference diameter and characteristics of the distal radial artery based on ultrasonographic assessment = Reference diameter and characteristics of the distal radial artery based on ultrasonographic assessment

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107983873

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background/Aims: While distal radial artery (DRA) access is increasingly being used for diagnostic coronary angiography, limited information is available regarding DRA size. We aimed to determine the DRA reference diameters of Korean patients and iden...

      Background/Aims: While distal radial artery (DRA) access is increasingly being used for diagnostic coronary angiography, limited information is available regarding DRA size. We aimed to determine the DRA reference diameters of Korean patients and identify the predictors of DRA diameter < 2.3 mm.
      Methods: The outer bilateral DRA diameters were assessed using a linear ultrasound probe in 1,162 consecutive patients who underwent transthoracic echocardiography. The DRA diameter was measured by the perpendicular angle in the dorsum of the hand, and the average values were compared by sex. DRA diameter < 2.3 mm was defined as unsuitable for routine diagnostic coronary angiography using a 5 Fr introducer sheath.
      Results: The mean DRA diameters were 2.31 ± 0.43 mm (right) and 2.35 ± 0.45 mm (left). The DRA was smaller in women than men (right: 2.15 ± 0.38 mm vs. 2.43 ± 0.44 mm, p < 0.001; left: 2.18 ± 0.39 mm vs. 2.47 ± 0.45 mm, p < 0.001). The DRA diameter was approximately 20% smaller than the radial artery diameter. A total of 630 (54.2%) and 574 (49.4%) patients had DRA diameter < 2.3 mm in the right and left hands, respectively. Female sex, low body mass index (BMI), and low body surface area (BSA) were significant predictors of DRA diameter < 2.3 mm.
      Conclusions: We provided reference DRA diameters for Korean patients. Approximately 50% of the studied patients had DRA diameter < 2.3 mm. Female sex, low BMI, and low BSA remained significant predictors of DRA diameter < 2.3 mm.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Hadjivassiliou A, "Ultrasound-guided access to the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuffbox for catheter-based vascular interventions : a technical guide" 16 : 1342-1348, 2021

      2 Mosteller RD, "Simplified calculation of body-surface area" 317 : 1098-, 1987

      3 Lang RM, "Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults : an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging" 28 : 1-39, 2015

      4 Lee JW, "Real-world experience of the left distal transradial approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention : a prospective observational study(LeDRA)" 14 : e995-e1003, 2018

      5 Valgimigli M, "Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management : a randomised multicentre trial" 385 : 2465-2476, 2015

      6 Dharma S, "Radial artery diameter does not correlate with body mass index : a duplex ultrasound analysis of 1706 patients undergoing trans-radial catheterization at three experienced radial centers" 228 : 169-172, 2017

      7 Kiemeneij F, "Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography(ldTRA)and interventions(ldTRI)" 13 : 851-857, 2017

      8 Norimatsu K, "Importance of measurement of the diameter of the distal radial artery in a distal radial approach from the anatomical snuffbox before coronary catheterization" 34 : 1615-1620, 2019

      9 김용철 ; Youngkeun Ahn ; Inna Kim ; Doo Hwan Lee ; 김민철 ; Doo Sun Sim ; Young Joon Hong ; Ju Han Kim ; Myung Ho Jeong, "Feasibility of Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Left Snuffbox Approach" 대한심장학회 48 (48): 1120-1130, 2018

      10 Naito T, "Evaluation of the diameter of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuffbox using ultrasound in Japanese patients" 34 : 312-316, 2019

      1 Hadjivassiliou A, "Ultrasound-guided access to the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuffbox for catheter-based vascular interventions : a technical guide" 16 : 1342-1348, 2021

      2 Mosteller RD, "Simplified calculation of body-surface area" 317 : 1098-, 1987

      3 Lang RM, "Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults : an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging" 28 : 1-39, 2015

      4 Lee JW, "Real-world experience of the left distal transradial approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention : a prospective observational study(LeDRA)" 14 : e995-e1003, 2018

      5 Valgimigli M, "Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management : a randomised multicentre trial" 385 : 2465-2476, 2015

      6 Dharma S, "Radial artery diameter does not correlate with body mass index : a duplex ultrasound analysis of 1706 patients undergoing trans-radial catheterization at three experienced radial centers" 228 : 169-172, 2017

      7 Kiemeneij F, "Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography(ldTRA)and interventions(ldTRI)" 13 : 851-857, 2017

      8 Norimatsu K, "Importance of measurement of the diameter of the distal radial artery in a distal radial approach from the anatomical snuffbox before coronary catheterization" 34 : 1615-1620, 2019

      9 김용철 ; Youngkeun Ahn ; Inna Kim ; Doo Hwan Lee ; 김민철 ; Doo Sun Sim ; Young Joon Hong ; Ju Han Kim ; Myung Ho Jeong, "Feasibility of Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Left Snuffbox Approach" 대한심장학회 48 (48): 1120-1130, 2018

      10 Naito T, "Evaluation of the diameter of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuffbox using ultrasound in Japanese patients" 34 : 312-316, 2019

      11 Mizuguchi Y, "Efficacy and safety of the distal transradial approach in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention : a Japanese multicenter experience" 35 : 162-167, 2020

      12 Valsecchi O, "Early clinical experience with right and left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox in 52 consecutive patients" 30 : 218-223, 2018

      13 Lee L, "Clinical determinants of radial artery caliber assessed at the time of transradial cardiac catheterization using routine prospective radiobrachial angiography" 19 : 939-943, 2018

      14 Bernat I, "Best practices for the prevention of radial artery occlusion after transradial diagnostic angiography and intervention : an international consensus paper" 12 : 2235-2246, 2019

      15 Sgueglia GA, "Anatomic basis and physiological rationale of distal radial artery access for percutaneous coronary and endovascular procedures" 11 : 2113-2119, 2018

      16 Neumann FJ, "2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization" 40 : 87-165, 2019

      17 Baumgartner H, "2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease" 38 : 2739-2791, 2017

      18 Ibanez B, "2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation : the task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology(ESC)" 39 : 119-177, 2018

      19 Nishimura RA, "2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease : a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines" 63 : e57-e185, 2014

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.37 0.26 1.02
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.83 0.73 0.566 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼