RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      내륙 습지보호지역의 생태계 건강성 평가 지표 시범 설정 = Establishing Ecosystem Health Assessment Indicators for Terrestrial Wetland Protected Areas

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109668596

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study is a preliminary research with the aim of establishing an ecosystem health assessment system that can be reflected in the management plans of protected inland wetland areas in South Korea, based on the results of a detailed survey conducted in these areas. This study sought to derive indicators of ecosystem health that should be prioritized for efficient management. The Delphi survey method was used in two rounds to identify potential indicators. The analysis results revealed that, in the field of the physicochemical environment, four indicators were selected: wetland area (㎡), wetland flow volume (㎥), water quality, and groundwater level (m). Regarding biodiversity, the indicators included the total number of observed species, total number of major species, average species diversity index of major animal taxonomic groups, number of apex predator species, number of legally protected species, and vegetation diversity index. For stress factors (threats), the indicators selected were the number of ecosystem-disrupting wildlife species, surrounding land-use status, artificial structures, number of invasive species, and human interference. The relative importance of these indicators for assessing the ecosystem health of inland wetlands was as follows: biodiversity (0.40); physicochemical environment (0.36); and threats (0.25). In terms of applicability, over 70% of experts agreed that these indicators were applicable to all types of wetlands, including mountainous, riverine, and lake-type wetlands.
      번역하기

      This study is a preliminary research with the aim of establishing an ecosystem health assessment system that can be reflected in the management plans of protected inland wetland areas in South Korea, based on the results of a detailed survey conducted...

      This study is a preliminary research with the aim of establishing an ecosystem health assessment system that can be reflected in the management plans of protected inland wetland areas in South Korea, based on the results of a detailed survey conducted in these areas. This study sought to derive indicators of ecosystem health that should be prioritized for efficient management. The Delphi survey method was used in two rounds to identify potential indicators. The analysis results revealed that, in the field of the physicochemical environment, four indicators were selected: wetland area (㎡), wetland flow volume (㎥), water quality, and groundwater level (m). Regarding biodiversity, the indicators included the total number of observed species, total number of major species, average species diversity index of major animal taxonomic groups, number of apex predator species, number of legally protected species, and vegetation diversity index. For stress factors (threats), the indicators selected were the number of ecosystem-disrupting wildlife species, surrounding land-use status, artificial structures, number of invasive species, and human interference. The relative importance of these indicators for assessing the ecosystem health of inland wetlands was as follows: biodiversity (0.40); physicochemical environment (0.36); and threats (0.25). In terms of applicability, over 70% of experts agreed that these indicators were applicable to all types of wetlands, including mountainous, riverine, and lake-type wetlands.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼