RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      기억의 규제와 규제를 통한 기억하기?: 홀로코스트 부정(Holocaust denial) 규제 법제와 사회적 기억의 구성 = Regulating Memory and Remembering through Regulation? : Law against Holocaust Denial and the Construction of Social Memory

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99851748

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The objective of this article is to do a discourse analysis on legal mechanisms for regulating the representation of history with particular reference to the rules governing denial and distortion of key traumatic events In pos World War 2 Europe, and to study the ways in which U1ey militate or penetrate into the memory space of postcolonial/post dictatorial East Asia. My hypothesis is that social memory or shared remembrance IS shaped and reproduced by regulatory discourse, and that the application of regulatory instrwuents to negationism simultaneously constructs and is constructed by transnational memory space. Tha is to say, sanctions against denial of the past actively manipulate memory discourse rather than passively suppressing misrepresentations of history. They can even act in a counter-productive way by provoking images and narratives such as fascination with the totalitarian order or Orientalist visions of colonial occupation. This research begins by s udying the reproduction of discourse surrounding the regulation of Holocaust denial in Europe in order to understand how it informs and in eracts with the controversy over legal norms on the denial and distortion of the past in East Asia. Then it continues to explore the ways in which moral controversies over distortions of history serve to generate and reproduce nostalgia for an imagined community. It will give particular a tention 0 aspects that expose double layers of collusion between apparently oppositional interests¬a combination of conservative legal norms(of expanding criminal justice) and progressive political practice, and a symbiosis between two otherwise mutually exclusive forms of nationalism or racism. My article aims to explore these effects in the context of European sanctions on Holocaust denial and consider how far the similar process is at work in cw-rent debates over he representation of key trawnatic events in history.
      번역하기

      The objective of this article is to do a discourse analysis on legal mechanisms for regulating the representation of history with particular reference to the rules governing denial and distortion of key traumatic events In pos World War 2 Europe, and ...

      The objective of this article is to do a discourse analysis on legal mechanisms for regulating the representation of history with particular reference to the rules governing denial and distortion of key traumatic events In pos World War 2 Europe, and to study the ways in which U1ey militate or penetrate into the memory space of postcolonial/post dictatorial East Asia. My hypothesis is that social memory or shared remembrance IS shaped and reproduced by regulatory discourse, and that the application of regulatory instrwuents to negationism simultaneously constructs and is constructed by transnational memory space. Tha is to say, sanctions against denial of the past actively manipulate memory discourse rather than passively suppressing misrepresentations of history. They can even act in a counter-productive way by provoking images and narratives such as fascination with the totalitarian order or Orientalist visions of colonial occupation. This research begins by s udying the reproduction of discourse surrounding the regulation of Holocaust denial in Europe in order to understand how it informs and in eracts with the controversy over legal norms on the denial and distortion of the past in East Asia. Then it continues to explore the ways in which moral controversies over distortions of history serve to generate and reproduce nostalgia for an imagined community. It will give particular a tention 0 aspects that expose double layers of collusion between apparently oppositional interests¬a combination of conservative legal norms(of expanding criminal justice) and progressive political practice, and a symbiosis between two otherwise mutually exclusive forms of nationalism or racism. My article aims to explore these effects in the context of European sanctions on Holocaust denial and consider how far the similar process is at work in cw-rent debates over he representation of key trawnatic events in history.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 양현아, "피해 증언의 생산과 ‘과거 청산’: ‘수지 김’ 유족 증언을 중심으로" 민주주의법학연구회 (33) : 135-170, 2007

      2 김현, "폭력의 구조/시칠리아의 암소" 문학과지성사 1999

      3 박희영, "인터넷을 통한 급진사상의 전파와 형법의 장소적 적용범위: 독일 연방대법원의 ‘유대인 대학살 거짓말’ 판결을 대상으로" 2004

      4 이준일, "인권법 - 사회적 이슈와 인권 -" 弘文社 2007

      5 이재승, "이행기의 정의" 법과사회이론학회 22 : 47-74, 2002

      6 김희정, "역사부정규제법제의 헌법적 정당성 : 홀로코스트부정(Holocaust Denial)을 중심으로" 고려대학교 2009

      7 전진성, "역사가 기억을 말한다" 휴머니스트 2005

      8 김원, "서발턴은 침묵하는가? -구술, 기억, 그리고 재현을 중심으로" 17 : 2009

      9 최호근, "부담스러운 과거와의 대면 -독일에서의 홀로코스트 기억" 한국서양사학회 (84) : 275-304, 2005

      10 이상돈, "법이론" 세창출판사 2005

      1 양현아, "피해 증언의 생산과 ‘과거 청산’: ‘수지 김’ 유족 증언을 중심으로" 민주주의법학연구회 (33) : 135-170, 2007

      2 김현, "폭력의 구조/시칠리아의 암소" 문학과지성사 1999

      3 박희영, "인터넷을 통한 급진사상의 전파와 형법의 장소적 적용범위: 독일 연방대법원의 ‘유대인 대학살 거짓말’ 판결을 대상으로" 2004

      4 이준일, "인권법 - 사회적 이슈와 인권 -" 弘文社 2007

      5 이재승, "이행기의 정의" 법과사회이론학회 22 : 47-74, 2002

      6 김희정, "역사부정규제법제의 헌법적 정당성 : 홀로코스트부정(Holocaust Denial)을 중심으로" 고려대학교 2009

      7 전진성, "역사가 기억을 말한다" 휴머니스트 2005

      8 김원, "서발턴은 침묵하는가? -구술, 기억, 그리고 재현을 중심으로" 17 : 2009

      9 최호근, "부담스러운 과거와의 대면 -독일에서의 홀로코스트 기억" 한국서양사학회 (84) : 275-304, 2005

      10 이상돈, "법이론" 세창출판사 2005

      11 송충기, "독일의 뒤늦은 과거청산: 나치하 외국인 강제노역자에 대한 보상을 중심으로" 역사문제연구소 (73) : 271-293, 2005

      12 송충기, "뉘른베르크 재판과 나치청산" 역사교육연구회 (93) : 223-249, 2005

      13 이소영, "기억의 정치와 ‘법을 통한 과거청산’ 담론 비판" 법학연구소 35 (35): 271-285, 2011

      14 Assmann, A, "기억의 공간(Erinnerungsräume)" 경북대학교 출판부 1999

      15 이재승, "기억과 법:홀로코스트 부정" 한국법철학회 11 (11): 223-252, 2008

      16 최정기, "과거청산에서의 기억 전쟁과 이행기 정의의 난점들- 광주민주화운동 관련 보상과 피해자의 트라우마를 중심으로" 한국지역사회학회 14 (14): 3-22, 2006

      17 이재승, "과거청산과 인권" 민주주의법학연구회 24 : 1-42, 2003

      18 Lim, J., "Victimhood Nationalism in Contested Memories, In Memory in a Global Age" Palgrave 2010

      19 LaCapra, D., "Trauma, Absence, Loss" 25 (25): 1999

      20 Alexander, J., "Toward a Theory of Cultural Trauma, In Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity" University of California Press 2004

      21 Rousso, H., "The Vichy Syndrome: History and Memory in France since 1944" Harvard University Press 1991

      22 Fronza, E., "The Punishment of Negationism: The Difficult Dialogue between Law and Memory" 30 : 2005

      23 Assmann, A., "The Holocaust- a Global Memory? Expansions and Limits of a New Memory Community, In Memory in a Global Age" Palgrave 2010

      24 Grimm, D., "The Holocaust Denial Decision of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany, In Extreme Speech and Democracy" Oxford University Press 2009

      25 Günther, K., "The Denial of Holocaust: Employing Criminal Law to Combat Anti-Semitism in Germany" 15 : 2000

      26 "Shut Up and Play Nice: How the Western World is Limiting Free Speech"

      27 LaCapra, D., "Representing Holocaust: History, Theory, Trauma" Cornell University Press 1994

      28 Nerone, J., "Professional History and Social Memory" 11 : 1989

      29 Alexander, J., "On the Social Construction of Moral Universals: The Holocaust from Mass Murder to Trauma Drama" 5 : 2002

      30 Fraser, D., "On the Internet, Nobody Knows You’re a Nazi: Some Comparative Legal Aspects of Holocast Denial on the WWW, In Extreme Speech and Democracy" Oxford University Press 2009

      31 Sturken, M, "Narratives and Recovery: Repressed Memory as Cultural Memory, In Acts of Memory: Cultural Recall In the Present" Dartmouth 1998

      32 Rückerl, A., "NS’-Verrechen vor Gericht" C. F. Müller 1982

      33 Rothberg, M., "Multidirectional Memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization" Princeton University Press 2009

      34 Teachout, P., "Making ‘Holocaust Denial’ a Crime: Reflections on European Anti-negationist Laws from the Perspective of U.S. Constitutional Experiences" 30 : 2006

      35 Smith, "Legislating against Genocide Denial: Criminalizing Denial or Preventing Free Speech?" 4 : 2010

      36 "Laws banning holocaust denial"

      37 "Holocaust denier Irving is jailed"

      38 Curren, V., "History, Memory and Law" 16 : 2011

      39 LaCapra, D., "History and Memory: In the Shadow of Holocaust, In History and Memory After Auschwitz" Cornell University Press 1998

      40 Whine, M., "Expanding Holocaust Denial and Legislation Against It" (spring) : 2008

      41 Hassemer, W., "Einführung in die Grundlagen des Strafrechts"

      42 "EU agrees new racial hatred law"

      43 "EU adopts measure outlawing Holocaust denial"

      44 Spearing, N., "Don’t Go Changing: On Richard Weisberg’s Critique of Stanley Fish and Holocaust Denial" 20 (20): 2008

      45 Lipstadt, D., "Denying the Holocaust" Free Press 1993

      46 "Convicted holocaust denier Irving expelled from Austria"

      47 Booth, W., "Communities of Memory: On Identity, Memory, and the Debt" 93 (93): 1999

      48 Woolford, A., "Collective on Moral Debts: Reparations for the Holocaust and Pořajmos" 40 (40): 2006

      49 Assmann, J., "Collective Memory and Cultural Identity" (65) : 1995

      50 Green. R., "Chemistry is not the Science: Rudolf, Rhetoric, and Reduction"

      51 Stone, D., "Beyond the Mnemosyne Institute: the Future of Memory after the Age of Commemoration, In The Future of Memory" Berghahn 2010

      52 Iggers, G., "20세기 사학사(Historiography in the 20th Century)" 푸른역사 1999

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.79 0.79 0.72
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.65 0.59 0.777 0.35
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼