RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      유머스타일 패턴과 심리사회적 적응 = Humor Style Patterns and Psychosocial Adjustment

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study focused on humor, which among the strengths of human beings and this strength is based on the positive psychology. This study aims to investigate groups of people displaying humor and the people were placed in groups depending on their combinations of humor styles (affiliative humor, self-enhancing humor, aggressive humor, self-defeating humor), and then the differences of psychosocial adjustment among the groups were examined. For this study, the Humor Style Questionnaire (HSQ), the Interpersonal Competence Questionnaire (ICQ), Rosenberg’s global self-esteem scale, the Index of Well-being and the CES-D-10 were used. The answers of 357 subjects were analyzed. When performing Hierarchical clustering and k-menas clustering, three clusters of the humor styles were identified: (1) Cluster 1 has above average scores on affiliative humor and self-enhancing humor and below average scores on aggressive humor and self-defeating humor; (2) Cluster 2 has above average scores on all of the styles (the negative humor styles scores are relatively higher than the positive humor styles scores); (3) Cluster 3 has below average scores on all of the styles. Members of Cluster 1 reported the highest levels in self-esteem, subjective well-being and in all the domains of interpersonal competence and members of Cluster 1 had the lowest levels in depression. No statistically significant differences were found between Cluster 2 and Cluster 3 for self-esteem, subjective well-being and depression. Cluster 2 showed a significantly low level in the Conflict Management domain as compared to that of the other groups. Cluster 3 showed a significantly low level in the Initiation domain than did the other groups. These results are significant in that they specifically identify the humor style patterns and their related psychosocial adjustment levels, and these results are important in that they provide grounds for counseling intervention to improve the level of human adaptation.
      번역하기

      This study focused on humor, which among the strengths of human beings and this strength is based on the positive psychology. This study aims to investigate groups of people displaying humor and the people were placed in groups depending on their comb...

      This study focused on humor, which among the strengths of human beings and this strength is based on the positive psychology. This study aims to investigate groups of people displaying humor and the people were placed in groups depending on their combinations of humor styles (affiliative humor, self-enhancing humor, aggressive humor, self-defeating humor), and then the differences of psychosocial adjustment among the groups were examined. For this study, the Humor Style Questionnaire (HSQ), the Interpersonal Competence Questionnaire (ICQ), Rosenberg’s global self-esteem scale, the Index of Well-being and the CES-D-10 were used. The answers of 357 subjects were analyzed. When performing Hierarchical clustering and k-menas clustering, three clusters of the humor styles were identified: (1) Cluster 1 has above average scores on affiliative humor and self-enhancing humor and below average scores on aggressive humor and self-defeating humor; (2) Cluster 2 has above average scores on all of the styles (the negative humor styles scores are relatively higher than the positive humor styles scores); (3) Cluster 3 has below average scores on all of the styles. Members of Cluster 1 reported the highest levels in self-esteem, subjective well-being and in all the domains of interpersonal competence and members of Cluster 1 had the lowest levels in depression. No statistically significant differences were found between Cluster 2 and Cluster 3 for self-esteem, subjective well-being and depression. Cluster 2 showed a significantly low level in the Conflict Management domain as compared to that of the other groups. Cluster 3 showed a significantly low level in the Initiation domain than did the other groups. These results are significant in that they specifically identify the humor style patterns and their related psychosocial adjustment levels, and these results are important in that they provide grounds for counseling intervention to improve the level of human adaptation.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 조맹제, "주요우울증환자 예비평가에서 the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale(CES-D)진단적 타당성 연구" 32 (32): 381-399, 1993

      2 윤상영, "제 2형 당뇨병 환자의 유머스타일, 우울, 자가관리 간의 관계" 이화여자대학교 대학원 2012

      3 한정원, "정서 표현성이 건강 및 주관적 안녕에 미치는 영향" 서울大學校 大學院 1997

      4 원호택, "자기개념과 편집증적 경향" 4 (4): 15-29, 1995

      5 정은이, "일상적 창의성과 심리·사회적 적응의 관계" 교육문제연구소 (18) : 4-120, 2003

      6 Martin. R. A, "유머심리학:통합적 접근" 박학사 2008

      7 권석만, "우울과 불안의 관계: 유발 생활사건과 인지내용에 있어서의 공통점과 차이점" 5 : 13-38, 1996

      8 신혜린, "사회불안 군집 유형에 따른 심리적 안정감의 차이" 한국건강심리학회 15 (15): 261-279, 2010

      9 김동직, "문화적 맥락에서 본 개별성-관계성과 심리적 적응의 관계" 高麗大學校 大學院 1999

      10 김민정, "대학생의 자존감과 심리적 부적응의 관계: 승인 욕구의 중재효과" 한국심리학회산하학교심리학회 5 (5): 289-304, 2008

      1 조맹제, "주요우울증환자 예비평가에서 the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale(CES-D)진단적 타당성 연구" 32 (32): 381-399, 1993

      2 윤상영, "제 2형 당뇨병 환자의 유머스타일, 우울, 자가관리 간의 관계" 이화여자대학교 대학원 2012

      3 한정원, "정서 표현성이 건강 및 주관적 안녕에 미치는 영향" 서울大學校 大學院 1997

      4 원호택, "자기개념과 편집증적 경향" 4 (4): 15-29, 1995

      5 정은이, "일상적 창의성과 심리·사회적 적응의 관계" 교육문제연구소 (18) : 4-120, 2003

      6 Martin. R. A, "유머심리학:통합적 접근" 박학사 2008

      7 권석만, "우울과 불안의 관계: 유발 생활사건과 인지내용에 있어서의 공통점과 차이점" 5 : 13-38, 1996

      8 신혜린, "사회불안 군집 유형에 따른 심리적 안정감의 차이" 한국건강심리학회 15 (15): 261-279, 2010

      9 김동직, "문화적 맥락에서 본 개별성-관계성과 심리적 적응의 관계" 高麗大學校 大學院 1999

      10 김민정, "대학생의 자존감과 심리적 부적응의 관계: 승인 욕구의 중재효과" 한국심리학회산하학교심리학회 5 (5): 289-304, 2008

      11 김경희, "대인관계 유능성에 대한 긍정정서의 영향: 경험 회피와 자기자비, 인지적 공감의 경로 탐색" 한국상담학회 16 (16): 83-107, 2015

      12 김창대, "대인관계 능력 향상을 위한 집단 상담 프로그램의 효과 연구" 서울대학교 학생생활 연구소 35 (35): 83-95, 1999

      13 배미정, "내현적 자기애 성향, 자존감, 인지적 및 정서적 공감 그리고 대인관계 유능성 간의 관련성 연구" 한국상담학회 15 (15): 2417-2435, 2014

      14 Baumgardner, S. R, "긍정심리학" 시그마프레스 2009

      15 Ruch, W. F., "Training the sense of humor with the 7 Humor Habits Program and satisfaction with life" 31 (31): 287-309, 2018

      16 Fredrickson, B. L., "The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions" 56 : 218-226, 2001

      17 Szabo, A., "The acute effects of humor and exercise on mood and anxiety" 35 (35): 152-162, 2003

      18 Andresen, E. M., "Screening for depression in well older adults: Evaluation of a short form of the CES-D" 10 (10): 77-76, 1994

      19 Sirigatti, S., "Relationships between humorism profiles and psychological well-being" 90 : 219-224, 2016

      20 Hair, J. F., "Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics" American Psychological Association 147-205, 2000

      21 Seligman, M. E. P., "Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions" 60 : 410-421, 2005

      22 Hair, J. F., "Multivariate Data Analysis" Pearson Prentice Hall 2009

      23 Martin, R. A., "Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the humor styles questionnaire" 37 (37): 48-75, 2003

      24 Galloway, G., "Individual differences in personal humor styles: Identification of prominent patterns and their associates" 48 (48): 563-567, 2010

      25 Kazarian, S. S., "Humor styles, culture-related personality, well-being, and family adjustment among Armenians in Lebanon" 19 (19): 405-423, 2006

      26 Kuiper, N. A., "Humor styles as mediators between self-evaluative standards and psychological well-being" 143 (143): 359-376, 2009

      27 Stieger, S., "Humor styles and their relationship to explicit and implicit self-esteem" 50 (50): 747-750, 2011

      28 Zeigler-Hill, V., "Humor style mediates the association between pathological narcissism and self-esteem" 50 (50): 1196-1201, 2011

      29 Leist, A. K. & Müller, "Humor Types Show Different Patterns of Self-Regulation, Self-Esteem, and Well-Being" 14 (14): 551-569, 2013

      30 Yue, X. D., "Humor Styles, Dispositional Optimism, and Mental Health Among Undergraduates in Hong Kong and China" 11 (11): 173-188, 2010

      31 Buhrmester, D., "Five domains of interpersonal competence in peer relationships" 55 (55): 991-1008, 1988

      32 Cai, C., "Effectiveness of humor intervention for patients with schizophrenia: A randomized controlled trial" 59 : 174-178, 2014

      33 Dozois D. J. A., "Early maladaptive schemas and adaptive/maladaptive styles of humor" 33 (33): 585-596, 2009

      34 Jovanovic, V., "Do humor styles matter in the relationship between personality and subjective well-being?" 52 (52): 502-507, 2011

      35 McCosker, B., "Differential effects of self-esteem and interpersonal competence on humor styles" 5 : 143-150, 2012

      36 Saroglou, V., "Bad humor, bad marriage: Humor styles in divorced and married couples" 94-121, 2010

      37 Chen, G., "A comparison of humor styles, coping humor, and mental health between chinese and canadian university students" 20 (20): 215-234, 2007

      38 Peterson, C, "(긍정심리학 입장에서 본) 성격 강점과 덕목의 분류" 한국심리상담연구소 2009

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.18 1.18 1.2
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.23 1.17 1.625 0.41
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼