RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      국가물류비 산정방식에 의한 대전시의 지역물류비 산정 = Calculation of Regional Logistics Cost (RLC) by Method of National Logistics Cost in Daejeon City

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45031125

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Calculating logistics cost (LC) is important because regional logistics cost (RLC) is a useful index of establishing regional economy and logistics plan, and a measure of regional competitiveness. Nevertheless, Daejeon city have not calculated the RLC by this time. In this study, thus, RLC of Daejeon city, as an inland city, was calculated by applying the calculation method of national logistics cost. Total logistics cost was classified into transport cost, stock inventory cost, packing charge, stevedoring cost, logistics information cost, and general management cost. The period of estimation was limited to 1990` 2001, considered the calculated year of national logistics cost. As the results, RLC of Daejeon city was 1,891 billion Won except for international freight rates, and showed 11.8% increase yearly. That is to say, the size of RLC of Daejeon city is 2.8 % of national logistics cost, and 14.8 % of GRDP. Transport cost took the largest portion of RLC, whereas the stevedoring cost is the least. As additional remark, this study has a little limitation such as lack of appropriateness of some data sources, insufficiency of representation et al, while the estimation method of national logistics cost is applied. Nonetheless, this study would be expected to be used as a importance source in the establishment of city logistics policies since there is no recent RLC of Daejeon city.
      번역하기

      Calculating logistics cost (LC) is important because regional logistics cost (RLC) is a useful index of establishing regional economy and logistics plan, and a measure of regional competitiveness. Nevertheless, Daejeon city have not calculated the RLC...

      Calculating logistics cost (LC) is important because regional logistics cost (RLC) is a useful index of establishing regional economy and logistics plan, and a measure of regional competitiveness. Nevertheless, Daejeon city have not calculated the RLC by this time. In this study, thus, RLC of Daejeon city, as an inland city, was calculated by applying the calculation method of national logistics cost. Total logistics cost was classified into transport cost, stock inventory cost, packing charge, stevedoring cost, logistics information cost, and general management cost. The period of estimation was limited to 1990` 2001, considered the calculated year of national logistics cost. As the results, RLC of Daejeon city was 1,891 billion Won except for international freight rates, and showed 11.8% increase yearly. That is to say, the size of RLC of Daejeon city is 2.8 % of national logistics cost, and 14.8 % of GRDP. Transport cost took the largest portion of RLC, whereas the stevedoring cost is the least. As additional remark, this study has a little limitation such as lack of appropriateness of some data sources, insufficiency of representation et al, while the estimation method of national logistics cost is applied. Nonetheless, this study would be expected to be used as a importance source in the establishment of city logistics policies since there is no recent RLC of Daejeon city.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "해사물류연감" 코리아쉬핑가제트

      2 "한국의 사회지표"

      3 "철도통계연보" 철도청

      4 "종합물가정보" 종합물가정보

      5 "종합물가정보" 한국물가정보

      6 "조사통계월보"

      7 "임금구조기본통계조사보고서" 노동부

      8 "운수업통계조사보고서" 통계청

      9 "우리나라 물류비의 결정요인과 추이" 교통개발연구원 1995

      10 "에너지총조사보고서" 산업자원부 2001

      1 "해사물류연감" 코리아쉬핑가제트

      2 "한국의 사회지표"

      3 "철도통계연보" 철도청

      4 "종합물가정보" 종합물가정보

      5 "종합물가정보" 한국물가정보

      6 "조사통계월보"

      7 "임금구조기본통계조사보고서" 노동부

      8 "운수업통계조사보고서" 통계청

      9 "우리나라 물류비의 결정요인과 추이" 교통개발연구원 1995

      10 "에너지총조사보고서" 산업자원부 2001

      11 "손해보험통계연보" 보험개발원

      12 "서울시의 지역물류비 산정 및 추이분석" 5 (5): 17-36, 2004

      13 "동북아 물류중심도시경제자유구역 성공을 위한 인천광역시 도시물류기본계획" 인천광역시 2004

      14 "대구광역시 도시물류기본계획(안)" 대구경북개발연구원 2004

      15 "기업의 물류관리현상과 발전과제 조사보고" 대한상공회의소 1993

      16 "기업경영분석" 한국은행

      17 "국가경쟁력 강화를 위한 국가물류비 감소대책(1단계) 국가물류비 결정요인 분석 교통개발연구원" 2003

      18 "골판지포장산업경영보고서" 한국골판지포장공업협동조합 2003

      19 "고속도로 교통량통계" 한국도로공사

      20 "경기도 물류비용 분석 및 물류체계 개선 연구" 경기개발연구원 1999

      21 "건설교통통계연보" 건설교통부

      22 "건설교통부고시 기업물류비 계산에 관한 지침해설서" 건설교통부한국공인회계사회대한상공회의소 1998

      23 "Physical Distribution Cost and Service"

      24 "Macroeconomic Cost of Physical Distributon" 1962

      25 "2002년 국가교통DB최종보고서" 2003

      26 "2001년 국가물류비산정 및 추이분석" 2003

      27 "1999年度業種別物流コスト實態調査報告書" Japan Institute of Logistics System 2000

      28 "1996년 국가물류비산정 및 추이분석" 1998

      29 "14th Annual State of Logistics Report" Cass and ProLogis 2003

      30 "'99 기업의 물류관리 실태" 1999

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.19 1.19 1.09
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.05 0.99 1.114 0.31
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼