RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      한국인 영어 학습자의 관계절 습득에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Acquisition of Relative Clauses by Korean leaners of English

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12192715

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Learning English relative pronouns is generally considered difficult for EFL/ESL students, especially Korean learners. Even native speakers have difficulty in acquiring relative pronouns. The structural gaps between English and Korean are larger than those between English and European languages.
      This study is concerned with the relative difficulties in learning and forming relative clauses for learners. We will consider how to teach them more effectively. In this study, Kuno(1947)'s relative clauses and Keenan and Comire(1977)'s Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy are used. According to Kuno's hypothesis, it is easier for learners to connect sentences at sentence-end than in the middle. Also, Keenan and Comire's hypothesis insisted learners made relative pronouns based on the Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy as follows:
      S> DO > IO > OP > GEN> OCOMP ( > more accessible than)
      In this study, ten different types of questions about relative clauses are used. These questions are derived from Kuno's Relative Clauses and Keenan and Comire's Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy. For this study, 50 questions including twenty attractors were given to 85 students living in Seoul. The experimental group was divided into A and B group. One group was the first-year high school students and the other was university students. The students were asked to solve the questions within a given time limit.
      The experiment showed some interesting results. The results of Kuno hypothesis are follows: when relative clause is connected to the object in the main clauses, the students find the correct answers easily. The most difficult relative clauses is the relative clauses that is connected to the subject in the main clause. Therefore, students found relative pronouns more easily when they were located at the end rather than in the middle of sentences.
      Keenan and Comire suggested that noun phrases have an accessibility hierarchy and relative pronouns have relatives difficulties. However, the A group students differ from hierarchy hypothesis as follow;
      S> IO> OP> DO> GEN ( > more accessible than)
      B group students result in hierarchy hypothesis as follow;
      S> OP> IO> DO> GEN ( > more accessible than)
      Finally, based on the findings mentioned above, the comparative difficulties of English relative clauses should be emphasized when students learn relative pronouns. This thesis suggest how teachers can teach students relative pronouns and what activities are possible to reduce student's difficulties. The most important thing is to teach relative pronouns in the meaningful context and provide enough opportunity for students to practice them.
      번역하기

      Learning English relative pronouns is generally considered difficult for EFL/ESL students, especially Korean learners. Even native speakers have difficulty in acquiring relative pronouns. The structural gaps between English and Korean are larger than ...

      Learning English relative pronouns is generally considered difficult for EFL/ESL students, especially Korean learners. Even native speakers have difficulty in acquiring relative pronouns. The structural gaps between English and Korean are larger than those between English and European languages.
      This study is concerned with the relative difficulties in learning and forming relative clauses for learners. We will consider how to teach them more effectively. In this study, Kuno(1947)'s relative clauses and Keenan and Comire(1977)'s Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy are used. According to Kuno's hypothesis, it is easier for learners to connect sentences at sentence-end than in the middle. Also, Keenan and Comire's hypothesis insisted learners made relative pronouns based on the Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy as follows:
      S> DO > IO > OP > GEN> OCOMP ( > more accessible than)
      In this study, ten different types of questions about relative clauses are used. These questions are derived from Kuno's Relative Clauses and Keenan and Comire's Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy. For this study, 50 questions including twenty attractors were given to 85 students living in Seoul. The experimental group was divided into A and B group. One group was the first-year high school students and the other was university students. The students were asked to solve the questions within a given time limit.
      The experiment showed some interesting results. The results of Kuno hypothesis are follows: when relative clause is connected to the object in the main clauses, the students find the correct answers easily. The most difficult relative clauses is the relative clauses that is connected to the subject in the main clause. Therefore, students found relative pronouns more easily when they were located at the end rather than in the middle of sentences.
      Keenan and Comire suggested that noun phrases have an accessibility hierarchy and relative pronouns have relatives difficulties. However, the A group students differ from hierarchy hypothesis as follow;
      S> IO> OP> DO> GEN ( > more accessible than)
      B group students result in hierarchy hypothesis as follow;
      S> OP> IO> DO> GEN ( > more accessible than)
      Finally, based on the findings mentioned above, the comparative difficulties of English relative clauses should be emphasized when students learn relative pronouns. This thesis suggest how teachers can teach students relative pronouns and what activities are possible to reduce student's difficulties. The most important thing is to teach relative pronouns in the meaningful context and provide enough opportunity for students to practice them.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 제 1 장 서론 1
      • 1.1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
      • 1.2. 연구의 구성 4
      • 제 2 장 이론적 배경 5
      • 2.1. 입력가설(Input Hypothesis) 5
      • 제 1 장 서론 1
      • 1.1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
      • 1.2. 연구의 구성 4
      • 제 2 장 이론적 배경 5
      • 2.1. 입력가설(Input Hypothesis) 5
      • 2.2. 대조분석 가설(Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis) 6
      • 2.3. 관계대명사의 기능과 특징 9
      • 2.3.1. 관계대명사의 정의 9
      • 2.3.2. 관계대명사의 용법 및 종류 13
      • 2.4. 관계절 습득의 이론적 배경 20
      • 2.4.1. Kuno(1974)의 관계절 습득의 난이도 20
      • 2.4.2. Keenan과 Comrie(1977)의 명사구 도달가능성 순위 21
      • 2.5. 선행연구 22
      • 제 3 장 실험 연구 24
      • 3.1. 실험 연구 목적 24
      • 3.2. 실험 연구 가설 24
      • 3.3. 실험 연구 대상 25
      • 3.4. 실험 연구 방법 25
      • 3.5. 실험 연구의 제한점 30
      • 제 4 장 연구결과 31
      • 4.1. A 그룹의 연구결과 31
      • 4.1.1. Kuno의 관계절 위치에 따른 습득 31
      • 4.1.2. Keenan과 Comrie의 명사구 도달가능성 순위 35
      • 4.2. B 그룹의 연구결과 38
      • 4.2.1. Kuno의 관계절 위치에 따른 습득 38
      • 4.2.2. Keenan과 Comrie의 명사구 도달가능성 순위 42
      • 4.3. 오류분석 45
      • 4.3.1. 선행사가 주어인 객관식 문항 오류분석 45
      • 4.3.2. 선행사가 목적어인 객관식 문항 오류분석 46
      • 4.3.3. 선행사가 주어인 주관식 문항 오류분석 47
      • 4.3.4. 선행사가 목적어인 주관식 문항 오류분석 50
      • 제 5 장 A와 B 그룹의 연구결과 비교 분석 54
      • 5.1. 결과분석 54
      • 5.1.1. Kuno의 평균값 분석 54
      • 5.1.2. Keenan과 Comrie의 명사구 도달 가능성 평균값 분석 62
      • 제 6 장 결론 및 논의 70
      • 참고문헌 74
      • ABSTRACT 79
      • 부록 81
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼