RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      5년간의 친자감정에 대한 요약 및 소고 = Looking Back at Our 5-Year Experience of Paternity Testing: A Summary

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103570242

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      We have been testing familial relationships based on short tandem repeats (STRs) in families who requested it either voluntarily or by order of the court Here, we present a summary of our 5-year experience of autosomal STRbased paternity tests. A tota...

      We have been testing familial relationships based on short tandem repeats (STRs) in families who requested it either voluntarily or by order of the court Here, we present a summary of our 5-year experience of autosomal STRbased paternity tests. A total of 1,431 individuals from 588 cases were tested, including 878 pairs of either of the parent, and a child. Among these 588 cases, genetic information about the other parent was available only for 135 cases. Five hundred eighteen pairs were concluded to be parent-child relations, for which the median paternity index (PI) was 72,826, and the median decimal logarithm was 4.860. Autosomal mutation was observed in nine pairs (1.74%), and the pairs harbored only one mismatched locus among the 15 standard loci (D8S1179, D21S11, D7S820, CSF1PO, D3S1358, TH01, D13S317, D16S539, D2S1338, D19S433, vWA, TPOX, D18S51, D5S818, and FGA). The number of mismatched loci did not increase even after additional loci were included in the study. The observed mutation rates were D13S317 (0.193%), D18S51 (0.193%), D19S433 (0.193%), FGA (0.193%), vWA (0.386%), Penta D (0.387%), and Penta E (0.193%). There were 14 pairs with two mismatched loci, which we excluded through additional tests on either autosomal or X chromosomal STRs, and mitochondrial sequencing. Although PI is useful for determining parentchild relation, it provides indirect information; it is an interpretation of the test results that is based on probability. Additional genotyping on sex chromosome and mitochondrial DNA, or participation of other family members might be beneficial for a reliable conclusion.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 양인석, "상염색체 STR 유전자형 시뮬레이션을 이용한 한국인에서의혈연지수 분포 분석" 대한법의학회 37 (37): 57-65, 2013

      2 Lindner I, "Usefulness of SNPs as supplementary markers in a paternity case with 3genetic incompatibilities at autosomal and Y chromosomal loci" 41 : 117-121, 2014

      3 Jeong YB, "The truth about DNA" Gimmyoung Publishers 106-112, 2008

      4 Nothnagel M, "Potentials and limits of pairwise kinship analysis using autosomal short tandem repeat loci" 124 : 205-215, 2010

      5 von Wurmb-Schwark N, "Possible pitfalls in motherless paternity analysis with related putative fathers" 159 : 92-97, 2006

      6 Brenner CH, "Mutations in paternity" Charles H. Brenner

      7 Jin B, "Mutational analysis of 33 autosomal short tandem repeat (STR) loci in southwest Chinese Han population based on trio parentage testing" 23 : 86-90, 2016

      8 Brinkmann B, "Mutation rate in human microsatellites: influence of the structure and length of the tandem repeat" 62 : 1408-1415, 1998

      9 O'Connor KL, "Linkage disequilibrium analysis of D12S391 and vWA in U.S. population and paternity samples" 5 : 538-540, 2011

      10 Hong SB, "Korean population genetic data and concordance for the PowerPlex(R) ESX 17, AmpFlSTR Identifiler(R), and PowerPlex(R) 16 systems" 7 : e47-e51, 2013

      1 양인석, "상염색체 STR 유전자형 시뮬레이션을 이용한 한국인에서의혈연지수 분포 분석" 대한법의학회 37 (37): 57-65, 2013

      2 Lindner I, "Usefulness of SNPs as supplementary markers in a paternity case with 3genetic incompatibilities at autosomal and Y chromosomal loci" 41 : 117-121, 2014

      3 Jeong YB, "The truth about DNA" Gimmyoung Publishers 106-112, 2008

      4 Nothnagel M, "Potentials and limits of pairwise kinship analysis using autosomal short tandem repeat loci" 124 : 205-215, 2010

      5 von Wurmb-Schwark N, "Possible pitfalls in motherless paternity analysis with related putative fathers" 159 : 92-97, 2006

      6 Brenner CH, "Mutations in paternity" Charles H. Brenner

      7 Jin B, "Mutational analysis of 33 autosomal short tandem repeat (STR) loci in southwest Chinese Han population based on trio parentage testing" 23 : 86-90, 2016

      8 Brinkmann B, "Mutation rate in human microsatellites: influence of the structure and length of the tandem repeat" 62 : 1408-1415, 1998

      9 O'Connor KL, "Linkage disequilibrium analysis of D12S391 and vWA in U.S. population and paternity samples" 5 : 538-540, 2011

      10 Hong SB, "Korean population genetic data and concordance for the PowerPlex(R) ESX 17, AmpFlSTR Identifiler(R), and PowerPlex(R) 16 systems" 7 : e47-e51, 2013

      11 Gjertson DW, "ISFG: Recommendations on biostatistics in paternity testing" 1 : 223-231, 2007

      12 Butler JM, "Genetics and genomics of core short tandem repeat loci used in human identity testing" 51 : 253-265, 2006

      13 Academy of DNA Profile, "Genetic forensics" Tamgudang 107-131, 2001

      14 O'Connor KL, "Effect of linkage between vWA and D12S391 in kinship analysis" 6 : 840-844, 2012

      15 American Association of Blood Banks, "Annual report summary for testing in 2013" American Association of Blood Banks

      16 Wu W, "Analysis of linkage and linkage disequilibrium for syntenic STRs on 12 chromosomes" 128 : 735-739, 2014

      17 Thomson JA, "Analysis of disputed singleparent/child and sibling relationships using 16 STR loci" 115 : 128-134, 2001

      18 Kim YL, "Allele frequencies of 15 STR loci using AmpF/STR Identifiler kit in a Korean population" 136 : 92-95, 2003

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (등재후보2차)
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.38 0.38 0.41
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.36 0.3 0.6 0.08
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼