RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      청주 도심 상업가로 공개공지 계획요소 중요도 분석 = The Importance of Planning Elements of Privately Owned Public Open Spaces of a Downtown Commercial Streets in Cheongju City

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17379323

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to analyze the importance of planning elements for Privately Owned Public Open Spaces (POPS) to seek directions for qualitative improvement in downtown commercial streets. While POPS have secured urban public space, qualitative aspects such as cognizability, accessibility, and convenience have been overlooked compared to quantitative expansion.
      The key findings are as follows:
      First, a distinct cognitive gap was identified between the two groups. While experts prioritized 'Management' and 'Convenience' through AHP analysis, general users showed extremely low awareness of the space's existence. This highlights the limitations of 'supplier-centered planning,' where experts focus on functional infrastructure while users face barriers at the initial recognition stage. Notably, 'Identification,' ranked 5th by experts, proved to be the primary barrier determining spatial entry for users.
      Second, the reality of 'Lost Space' was identified. The survey revealed that 75.7% of users were unaware of the space's public nature, indicating that physical openness does not equate to psychological openness. This is interpreted as a "psychological entry barrier" caused by the divergence between the experts' 'management-efficient perspective' and the users' 'place-experiential perspective.'
      Third, the effectiveness of planning elements varied by spatial type. For 'Covered-types' (Unity Multiplex, etc.), management performance and staying comfort to prevent privatization were key variables. For 'Open-plaza types' (Juness, etc.), street connectivity and identification played a more significant role. These results support the necessity of differentiated planning guidelines based on physical conditions rather than uniform legal standards.
      In conclusion, this study identifies the perceptual gap between supply-oriented planning and user-based spatial experiences. By establishing priority planning elements for POPS in downtown commercial streets, these findings are expected to provide fundamental reference data for future urban planning and policy development.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to analyze the importance of planning elements for Privately Owned Public Open Spaces (POPS) to seek directions for qualitative improvement in downtown commercial streets. While POPS have secured urban public space, qualit...

      The purpose of this study is to analyze the importance of planning elements for Privately Owned Public Open Spaces (POPS) to seek directions for qualitative improvement in downtown commercial streets. While POPS have secured urban public space, qualitative aspects such as cognizability, accessibility, and convenience have been overlooked compared to quantitative expansion.
      The key findings are as follows:
      First, a distinct cognitive gap was identified between the two groups. While experts prioritized 'Management' and 'Convenience' through AHP analysis, general users showed extremely low awareness of the space's existence. This highlights the limitations of 'supplier-centered planning,' where experts focus on functional infrastructure while users face barriers at the initial recognition stage. Notably, 'Identification,' ranked 5th by experts, proved to be the primary barrier determining spatial entry for users.
      Second, the reality of 'Lost Space' was identified. The survey revealed that 75.7% of users were unaware of the space's public nature, indicating that physical openness does not equate to psychological openness. This is interpreted as a "psychological entry barrier" caused by the divergence between the experts' 'management-efficient perspective' and the users' 'place-experiential perspective.'
      Third, the effectiveness of planning elements varied by spatial type. For 'Covered-types' (Unity Multiplex, etc.), management performance and staying comfort to prevent privatization were key variables. For 'Open-plaza types' (Juness, etc.), street connectivity and identification played a more significant role. These results support the necessity of differentiated planning guidelines based on physical conditions rather than uniform legal standards.
      In conclusion, this study identifies the perceptual gap between supply-oriented planning and user-based spatial experiences. By establishing priority planning elements for POPS in downtown commercial streets, these findings are expected to provide fundamental reference data for future urban planning and policy development.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 1
      • 2. 연구의 범위 및 방법 6
      • (1) 연구의 범위 6
      • (2) 연구의 방법과 과정 7
      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 1
      • 2. 연구의 범위 및 방법 6
      • (1) 연구의 범위 6
      • (2) 연구의 방법과 과정 7
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 고찰 11
      • 1. 공개공지 11
      • (1) 공개공지의 개념 11
      • (2) 공개공지 제도 및 정책의 흐름 14
      • (3) 공개공지의 유형 및 특성 22
      • 2. 도심 상업가로 28
      • (1) 가로의 개념 28
      • (2) 가로의 유형과 특성 31
      • (3) 도심 상업가로의 특징 34
      • 3. 선행연구 고찰 36
      • (1) 선행연구 동향 36
      • (2) 선행연구와의 차별성 43
      • Ⅲ. 분석의 틀 47
      • 1 분석지표 도출 47
      • (1) 선행연구 계획요소의 통합 및 분류 47
      • (2) 청주시 공개공지 현황 56
      • (3) 선행연구 계획요소와 청주시 공개공지 적용 현황 69
      • 2. 연구대상지 선정 74
      • (1) 연구대상지 선정 기준 74
      • (2) 연구대상지 개요 및 현황 75
      • 3. 주체별 설문조사 79
      • (1) 전문가 집단 AHP 설계 79
      • (2) 일반이용자 집단 설문조사 설계 83
      • Ⅳ. 계획요소 중요도 분석 및 평가 86
      • 1. 주체별 설문 개요 86
      • (1) 전문가 집단 설문 개요 86
      • (2) 일반이용자 집단 설문 개요 86
      • 2. 주체별의 계획요소 중요도 분석 91
      • (1) 전문가 집단 중요도 분석 91
      • (2) 일반 이용자 집단 중요도 분석 102
      • 3. 분석의 종합 111
      • (1) 주체별 상위 계획요소 중요도 인식 대조 112
      • (2) '공급자 중심 계획'과 '수요자 지각'의 충돌 112
      • (3) 분석의 시사점: 일관된 경험 설계로의 전환 113
      • Ⅴ. 결론 114
      • 참고문헌 116
      • ■ 부록 1. 공개공지 현황조사표 119
      • ■ 부록 2. 서문로변 건축물 현황조사표 121
      • ■ 부록 3. 공개공지 현황조사표 123
      • ■ 부록 4. 설문지(일반 이용자, 전문가) 146
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼