RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      국내기업의 CSR활동은 투자인가 비용인가?

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103378624

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Recently, corporate social responsibility (hereafter, CSR) of firms has become an important topic in all fields of business. The topic takes a greater importance in Korea which has accomplished rapid economic growth mostly from large companies. There ...

      Recently, corporate social responsibility (hereafter, CSR) of firms has become an important topic in all fields of business. The topic takes a greater importance in Korea which has accomplished rapid economic growth mostly from large companies. There are two opposing views, both theoretically and empirically, on the role of CSR. The first is the value-enhancing view of CSR, which argues that CSR activity is a positive NPV investment thus increasing firm value. A possible channel for this role of CSR is that so long as CSR promotes wealth increase of some stakeholders, these stakeholders will support the firm’s other business activities and contribute to the firm’s performance. The other view is the expense view of CSR, which argues that CSR is a manifestation of an agency problem and thus hurts firm value and shareholders’ wealth. Based on the expense view of CSR, managers can exploit CSR at the expense of shareholders in order to gain good reputation from other stakeholders.
      Based on these two opposing views of CSR, this study empirically examines the CSR activities of Korean firms in relationship to the degree of product market competition and the amount of R&D investment. As a proxy of CSR activity, we use the KEJI index provided by CCEJ as the dependent variable. Other main variables of this study are HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index) to measure the degree of product market competition, and the amount of R&D investment, leverage and free cash flow of firms. Using firms listed in the Korea Exchange and those that are in the manufacturing industry, we perform various regression analyses including the Fama-MacBeth cross sectional regressions. The sample period of the study is between January, 2009 and December, 2015.
      Our main results of the empirical analyses are as follows. First, the degree of product market competition has a positive impact on the amount of CSR activities. This result supports the value-enhancing view of CSR. Second, the size of R&D investment also has a positive effect on the amount of CSR activities. This result supports the expense view of CSR. Third, the result with respect to the leverage and free cash flow variables, which are proxies of agency cost, is consistent with the expense view of CSR. Overall, results are more supportive of the expense view of CSR compared with the value-enhancing view of CSR. This implies that the CSR activies of Korea firms can be another showing of agency problem.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 류두진, "제품시장경쟁이 주식수익률에 미치는 영향: 한-미 FTA를 통한 증거" 한국재무학회 28 (28): 487-512, 2015

      2 류두원, "시장경쟁은 회사채 신용등급 변경공시에 따른 주식가격반응에 어떠한 영향을 주는가?" 한국경영학회 42 (42): 929-957, 2013

      3 류두원, "시장경쟁은 기업에 어떠한 영향을 미치는가?: 산업집중도와 기업가치 및 부채비율의 관계에 관한 실증연구" 한국경영학회 42 (42): 435-456, 2013

      4 류두원, "산업집중도에 따른 주식수익률 차이는 존재하는가?" 한국증권학회 43 (43): 657-678, 2014

      5 문철우, "사회적기업, 사회적 투자(Impact Investment)의 발전과 경영전략적 시사점" 한국경영학회 41 (41): 1435-1470, 2012

      6 이지혜, "사회적 책임 활동은 기업의 위험을 완화시키는가?" 한국경영학회 45 (45): 1551-1586, 2016

      7 이수정, "기업의 사회적 책임 활동의 야누스 효과" 한국경영학회 40 (40): 919-954, 2011

      8 이지혜, "기업의 사회적 책임 활동과 배당행태" 한국경영학회 43 (43): 353-385, 2014

      9 Chrisman, J. J., "Variations in R&D Investments of Family and Non-family Firms: Behavioral Agency and Myopic Loss Aversion Perspectives" 55 (55): 976-997, 2012

      10 Jensen, M. C., "Value Maximization, Stake-holder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function" 22 (22): 32-42, 2010

      1 류두진, "제품시장경쟁이 주식수익률에 미치는 영향: 한-미 FTA를 통한 증거" 한국재무학회 28 (28): 487-512, 2015

      2 류두원, "시장경쟁은 회사채 신용등급 변경공시에 따른 주식가격반응에 어떠한 영향을 주는가?" 한국경영학회 42 (42): 929-957, 2013

      3 류두원, "시장경쟁은 기업에 어떠한 영향을 미치는가?: 산업집중도와 기업가치 및 부채비율의 관계에 관한 실증연구" 한국경영학회 42 (42): 435-456, 2013

      4 류두원, "산업집중도에 따른 주식수익률 차이는 존재하는가?" 한국증권학회 43 (43): 657-678, 2014

      5 문철우, "사회적기업, 사회적 투자(Impact Investment)의 발전과 경영전략적 시사점" 한국경영학회 41 (41): 1435-1470, 2012

      6 이지혜, "사회적 책임 활동은 기업의 위험을 완화시키는가?" 한국경영학회 45 (45): 1551-1586, 2016

      7 이수정, "기업의 사회적 책임 활동의 야누스 효과" 한국경영학회 40 (40): 919-954, 2011

      8 이지혜, "기업의 사회적 책임 활동과 배당행태" 한국경영학회 43 (43): 353-385, 2014

      9 Chrisman, J. J., "Variations in R&D Investments of Family and Non-family Firms: Behavioral Agency and Myopic Loss Aversion Perspectives" 55 (55): 976-997, 2012

      10 Jensen, M. C., "Value Maximization, Stake-holder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function" 22 (22): 32-42, 2010

      11 Jensen, M. C., "Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure" 3 (3): 305-360, 1976

      12 Freidman, M., "The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits" 32 : 122-126, 1970

      13 Coase, R. H., "The Nature of the Firm" 4 : 386-405, 1937

      14 Hart, O. D., "The Market Mechanism as an Incentive Scheme" 14 (14): 366-382, 1983

      15 Tsao, S. M., "The Impact of Internationalization on Performance and Innovation: The Moderating Effects of Ownership Concentration" 29 : 617-642, 2012

      16 Lin, Z. J., "The Impact of Financing Constraints and Agency Costs on Corporate R&D Investment: Evidence from China" 17 (17): 3-42, 2017

      17 Servaes H., "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Value: The Role of Customer Awareness" 59 (59): 1045-1061, 2013

      18 Derwell, J., "The Eco-efficiency Premium Puzzle" 61 (61): 51-63, 2005

      19 Waddock, S. A., "The Cor-porate Social Performance-Financial Per-formance Link" 18 (18): 303-319, 1997

      20 Fama, E., "Testing Trade-Off and Pecking Order Predictions about Divi-dends and Debt" 15 (15): 1-33, 2002

      21 Hill, C. W. L., "Stakeholder-Agency Theory" 29 (29): 131-154, 1992

      22 Fama, E. F., "Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests" 81 (81): 607-636, 1973

      23 Himmelberg, C. P., "R&D and Internal Finance: A Panel Study of Small Firms in High-tech Industries" 76 (76): 38-51, 1994

      24 Alchian, A. A., "Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization" 62 (62): 777-795, 1972

      25 Scharfstein, D., "Product-Market Competition and Managerial Slack" 19 (19): 147-155, 1988

      26 Griffith, R., "Product Market Competition, Efficiency and Agency Cost: An Empirical Analysis" Institute for Fiscal Studies 2001

      27 Maria Cecilia Bustamante, "Product Market Competition and Industry Returns" Elsevier BV 2012

      28 Baggs, J., "Product Market Competition and Agency Costs" 55 (55): 289-323, 2007

      29 Lee, P. M., "Ownership Structures and R&D Investments of U.S. and Japanese Firms: Agency and Steward-ship Perspectives" 46 (46): 212-225, 2003

      30 Gompers, P. A., "Optimal Investment, Moni-toring, and the Staging of Venture Capital" 50 (50): 1461-1489, 1995

      31 Schmidt, K. M., "Managerial Incentives and Product Market Competition" 64 (64): 191-213, 1997

      32 Surroca, J., "Managerial En-trenchment and Corporate Social Performance" 35 (35): 748-789, 2008

      33 Pagano, M., "Manager, Workers, and Corporate Control" 60 (60): 841-868, 2005

      34 Hall, B. H., "Investment and Research and Development at the Firm Level: Does the Source of Financing Matter?" NBER 1992

      35 Hou, K., "Industry Concen-tration and Average Stock Returns" 61 (61): 1927-1956, 2006

      36 Bénabou, R., "Individual and Corporate Social Responsibility" 77 (77): 1-19, 2010

      37 Hall, B. H., "Handbook of the Eco-nomics of Innovation, Vol.1" Elsevier 2010

      38 Li, D., "Financial Constraints, R&D Invest-ment, and Stock Returns" 24 (24): 2974-3007, 2011

      39 Chen, H-L., "Employee Stock Ownership and Corporate R&D Expen-ditures: Evidence from Taiwan’s Information-Technology Industry" 23 : 369-384, 2006

      40 Edmans, A., "Does the Stock Market Fully Value Intangibles? Employee Satisfaction and Equity Prices" 101 (101): 621-640, 2011

      41 Jagannathan, R., "Does Product Market Competition Reduce Agency Costs?" 10 (10): 387-399, 1999

      42 Cheng, H., "Do Managers do Good with Other People’s Money?" NBER 2013

      43 Cronqvist, H., "Do Entrenched Ma-nagers Pay Their Workers More?" 64 : 309-339, 2009

      44 Dowell, G., "Do Cor-porate Global Environmental Standards Create or Destroy Market Value?" 46 (46): 1059-1074, 2000

      45 Cornell, B., "Corporate Stakeholder and Corporate Finance" 16 (16): 5-14, 1987

      46 Ryu, D., "Corporate Social Responsibility, Market Competition, and Shareholder Wealth" 45 (45): 16-30, 2016

      47 Kotchen, M., "Corporate Social Responsibility for Irresponsibility" 12 (12): 1-23, 2012

      48 Flammer, C., "Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Reaction: The Environ-mental Awareness of Investors" 56 (56): 758-781, 2013

      49 Garriga, E., "Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory" 53 : 51-71, 2004

      50 Tirole, J., "Corporate Governance" 69 : 1-35, 2001

      51 Krüger, P., "Corporate Goodness and Share-holder Wealth" 115 (115): 304-329, 2015

      52 Deng, X., "Cor-porate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Value Maximization: Evidence from Mergers" 110 (110): 87-109, 2013

      53 Nickell, S. J., "Competition and Corporate Performance" 104 (104): 724-746, 1996

      54 Vance, S., "Are Socially Responsible Firms Good Investment Risks?" 64 : 18-24, 1975

      55 Zeckhauser, R. J., "An Investigation Share Ownership and Corporate Performance Asym-metric Information, Corporate Finance, and Investment" Univ. of Chicago Press 149-180, 1990

      56 Jensen, M., "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers" 76 (76): 323-339, 1986

      57 Holmstrom, B., "Agency Costs and Innovation" 12 (12): 305-327, 1989

      58 Dimson, E., "Active Ownership" 28 (28): 3225-3268, 2015

      59 Shleifer, A., "A Theory of Yardstick Com-petition" 16 (16): 319-327, 1985

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼