In order to reduce the farmers’ burden of purchasing agricultural machinery and address the shortage of farm workers, the government have been promoting agricultural machinery rental service since 2003. Despite of political purpose, the outcome...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103324092
2016
Korean
KCI등재
학술저널
61-69(9쪽)
1
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
In order to reduce the farmers’ burden of purchasing agricultural machinery and address the shortage of farm workers, the government have been promoting agricultural machinery rental service since 2003. Despite of political purpose, the outcome...
In order to reduce the farmers’ burden of purchasing agricultural machinery and address the shortage of farm workers, the government have been promoting agricultural machinery rental service since 2003. Despite of political purpose, the outcome of agricultural machinery rental service turned out to be adverse, high cost and low efficiency, by the pork barrel projects operated from some municipalities. Therefore, this study was aimed to improve the efficiency of agricultural machinery rental service by analyzing the operation status of agricultural machinery in local government. A questionnaire survey was conducted at 134 cities and counties in terms of rent type, management personnel, business budget, agricultural machinery ownership, rental performance, use rates, operational problems, and improvement plan. This study found that some agricultural machinery rental offices were only focused on the short-term rental service, which caused the increasing number of operating personnel, required facilities/equipment. The short-term rental service has a limitation for promoting the mechanization rate in dry-field farming. Therefore, it should be carried out along with the long-term rental service which a lessee maintains and manages agricultural machinery directly. Furthermore, the reasonable number of agricultural machinery based on regional circumstances should be considered to meet rental demand and collect the minimal rental fee for purchasing new agricultural machinery and replacing old ones.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 NCFMEC, "Purchasing and leasing farm equipment: NCFMEC-05"
2 "MR, Die Maschinenring-Organisation"
3 신승엽, "Criteria for Determining Working Area and Operating Cost for Long-Term Lease of Agricultural Machinery" 한국농업기계학회 40 (40): 178-185, 2015
4 RDA, "Agricultural machinery rental service operating guide"
5 Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, "A study for promotion of agricultural machinery lease" 305-320, 2003
6 Japanese Association of Agricultural Mechanization, "A guidebook of lease & rental for agricultural machinery"
7 Statistics Korea, "2010∼2015 Agricultural forestry and fishery census report"
1 NCFMEC, "Purchasing and leasing farm equipment: NCFMEC-05"
2 "MR, Die Maschinenring-Organisation"
3 신승엽, "Criteria for Determining Working Area and Operating Cost for Long-Term Lease of Agricultural Machinery" 한국농업기계학회 40 (40): 178-185, 2015
4 RDA, "Agricultural machinery rental service operating guide"
5 Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, "A study for promotion of agricultural machinery lease" 305-320, 2003
6 Japanese Association of Agricultural Mechanization, "A guidebook of lease & rental for agricultural machinery"
7 Statistics Korea, "2010∼2015 Agricultural forestry and fishery census report"
농촌지역의 대중교통을 이용한 공공서비스시설 접근성 분석
패널중력모형을 이용한 동남아시아 대상 주요 수출 농산물 영향인자 분석
고령 농업인의 공동농사 프로그램 개발 및 적용 효과 분석
농업 생산기반 능력 및 재배여건을 이용한 고랭지 작물 주산지의 생산역량 분석
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2006-07-07 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning | |
2006-06-19 | 학술지등록 | 한글명 : 농촌계획외국어명 : 미등록 | |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2004-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.59 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.57 | 0.55 | 0.727 | 0.1 |