中国文学“诗性批评”传统对当代文学研究的启示 = The Enlightenment of Chinese Literary “Poetic Criticism” Tradition to The Contemporary Literature Study

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The essence of literature is poetic, we must return to the essence of literature about literary discovery and enquiry, “in order to the literature aim” we also must really face the literature. As far as the tradition of literary research, as a special traditional criticism of Chinese literary criticism, the poetic criticism always has the poetic essential of returning to the human itself because of its poetic characters such as entirety, imagery and gnosis. For a long time, in the Chinese Contemporary Literary Study(and almost eastern and western current literary study), the western rational criticism (scientific criticism), cultural criticism and thought history criticism, which using the literary external relashionship method which is determined and emphasized by the abstract thinking as well as more natural scientific method to study the literaure, has occupied a main position of literary criticism and research. In the Chinese Contemporary Literary Study, we neglect the human poetic existence and literary critical “poetic tradition” because of the science-oriented principle tendency and that leads to the current “non-literature”of literary study. Therefore, in the literary criticism and research of 21stcentury, especially in the “post-modern context”, which has the constant enlargement of the range of literature and sufficient impact of eletronic media, we must face and think profoundly the literary study of how to response to the human poetic existence, that is the essential topic of how to response to rhe literary poetic essence. Furthermore, we also must response to the literary criticism and literary research poetic essece through the heritage of Chinese literary “poetic criticism” tradition.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

장기간동안 서양의 문학비평 이론만 빌려 사용했기 때문에 중국 전통의 문학 사고방식과 비평이론은 안타깝게도 점점 사라져 가고 있다. 과학적 사고로 문학적 사고를, 학술 연구로 문학 연구를 대체시키는 잘못된 경향이 초래되었는데, 주류 연구 중 진정으로 문학 본체에 속하는 문학 연구와 비평은 거의 보이지 않는다. 과학적 비평과 이성적 판단을 굳게 지키는 서양 문학 연구 중에서 시적 성격은 종종 이성의 빛 아래 은폐되었고, 문학비평（Literary Criticsm） 중에서도 재판(Criticsm)이라는 방식으로 대체되었다. 따라서 우리가 문학과 문학 비평의 “본체”로 돌아가고 싶을 때에는 어쩔 수 없이 중국 문학과 중국 정통의 문학 비평으로 시선을 돌려야 한다. 왜냐하면 진정한 시적 문학 비평은 여기에만 존재하기 때문이다. 다시 말해서 한 때 버림받았던 중국 문학의 “시적비평” 전통은 과학 지상주의를 타파할 수 있는 최적의 선택인 것이다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 M.海德格尔, "诗.语言.思" 文化艺术出版社 1991

2 温儒敏, "现当代文学研究中的“空洞化”现象" 文艺研究 2004

3 叶朗, "现代美学体系" 北京大学出版社 1999

4 维柯, "新科学" 人民文学出版社 1986

5 托多洛夫语, "文学研究疆界的扩展及与文化研究的关系——王宁访谈 In: 中国图书评论" 2008

6 阿尔贝, "六说文学批评" 三联书店 1989

7 J.希利斯.米勒, "全球化时代文学研究还会继续存在吗 In: 文学评 论" 2001

8 陈思和, "中国新文学整体观" 上海文艺出版社 2001

9 钱穆, "中国文学论丛" 三联书店 2002